Paper · 2023 · The Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Nanoparticles enhanced morpho-physiological growth of wheat in contaminated soil by restricting cadmium mobility and accumulation

Hafiza Iqra Khalid

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Nanotechnology has obtained importance over conventional technologies to enhance crop growth, yield and environmental sustainability. Cadmium (Cd) is one of the most ecotoxic heavy metals that directly enter the food chain and accumulate in different human body organs such as kidneys, lungs, and liver. Cadmium (Cd) contamination in agricultural soils has now become a big issue, which affects food quality and causes a serious threat to human health and the environment. Nanoparticles (NPs) are effectively used to remediate Cd-contaminated soils, due to having a large surface area and high adsorption capacity. The present study evaluated the effects of three NPs i.e., iron (Fe), silicon (Si) and zinc (Zn) NPs on the growth, and physiology of plants as well as the accumulation of Cd in different parts of plants. The collected soil was spiked with different Cd levels (0, 5, 10, 20 mg kg-1), and NPs were applied at 60 mg kg-1 of soil prior to sowing. At maturity, plants exhibit significant increases in shoot length by 14, 12, 10% and 48, 30, 29% in root length in treatments amended with Fe, Si and Zn-NPs at 5 mg kg-1 Cd contamination levels. The grain yield was enhanced by 78% at 5mg kg-1 Cd level amended with Fe-NPs as compared to the control (no NPs application). The results revealed that NPs have a beneficial effect on stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and photosynthetic rate compared to control. The Cd concentration in various plant parts viz. roots, shoot and grains decreased by 36%, 35% and 69% after the application of NPs. However, this reduction was more distinct at 5 mg kg-1 Cd with Fe-NPs followed by Zn-NPS and Si-NPs. Overall, it was concluded that NPs play a significant role in the enhancement of plant biomass, increase in nutrient availability, and decrease the Cd accumulation in different plant parts

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe nanoparticles at 5 mg kg-1 Cd significantly increased wheat shoot length by 14%.

Organ / stage
shoote1
Treatment
Fee1
Outcome
shoot lengthe1
Direction
significant increasese1
Value
14e1
Qualifier
at 5 mg kg-1 Cd contamination levelse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nanoparticles enhanced morpho-physiological growth of wheat in contaminated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“At maturity, plants exhibit significant increases in shoot length by 14, 12, 10% and 48, 30, 29% in root length in treatments amended with Fe, Si and Zn-NPs at 5 mg kg-1 Cd contamination levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Si nanoparticles at 5 mg kg-1 Cd significantly increased wheat shoot length by 12%.

Organ / stage
shoote1
Treatment
Sie1
Outcome
shoot lengthe1
Direction
significant increasese1
Value
12e1
Qualifier
at 5 mg kg-1 Cd contamination levelse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nanoparticles enhanced morpho-physiological growth of wheat in contaminated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“At maturity, plants exhibit significant increases in shoot length by 14, 12, 10% and 48, 30, 29% in root length in treatments amended with Fe, Si and Zn-NPs at 5 mg kg-1 Cd contamination levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn nanoparticles at 5 mg kg-1 Cd significantly increased wheat shoot length by 10%.

Organ / stage
shoote1
Treatment
Zn-NPse1
Outcome
shoot lengthe1
Direction
significant increasese1
Value
10e1
Qualifier
at 5 mg kg-1 Cd contamination levelse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nanoparticles enhanced morpho-physiological growth of wheat in contaminated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“At maturity, plants exhibit significant increases in shoot length by 14, 12, 10% and 48, 30, 29% in root length in treatments amended with Fe, Si and Zn-NPs at 5 mg kg-1 Cd contamination levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe nanoparticles at 5 mg kg-1 Cd significantly increased wheat root length by 48%.

Organ / stage
roote1
Treatment
Fee1
Outcome
root lengthe1
Direction
significant increasese1
Value
48e1
Qualifier
at 5 mg kg-1 Cd contamination levelse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nanoparticles enhanced morpho-physiological growth of wheat in contaminated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“At maturity, plants exhibit significant increases in shoot length by 14, 12, 10% and 48, 30, 29% in root length in treatments amended with Fe, Si and Zn-NPs at 5 mg kg-1 Cd contamination levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Si nanoparticles at 5 mg kg-1 Cd significantly increased wheat root length by 30%.

Organ / stage
roote1
Treatment
Sie1
Outcome
root lengthe1
Direction
significant increasese1
Value
30e1
Qualifier
at 5 mg kg-1 Cd contamination levelse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nanoparticles enhanced morpho-physiological growth of wheat in contaminated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“At maturity, plants exhibit significant increases in shoot length by 14, 12, 10% and 48, 30, 29% in root length in treatments amended with Fe, Si and Zn-NPs at 5 mg kg-1 Cd contamination levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn nanoparticles at 5 mg kg-1 Cd significantly increased wheat root length by 29%.

Organ / stage
roote1
Treatment
Zn-NPse1
Outcome
root lengthe1
Direction
significant increasese1
Value
29e1
Qualifier
at 5 mg kg-1 Cd contamination levelse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nanoparticles enhanced morpho-physiological growth of wheat in contaminated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“At maturity, plants exhibit significant increases in shoot length by 14, 12, 10% and 48, 30, 29% in root length in treatments amended with Fe, Si and Zn-NPs at 5 mg kg-1 Cd contamination levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe nanoparticles at 5 mg kg-1 Cd enhanced wheat grain yield by 78% compared with no nanoparticles.

Treatment
Fe-NPse2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
enhancede2
Value
78%e2
Qualifier
5mg kg-1 Cd levele2
Comparator
control (no NPs application)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nanoparticles enhanced morpho-physiological growth of wheat in contaminated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e2

“The grain yield was enhanced by 78% at 5mg kg-1 Cd level amended with Fe-NPs as compared to the control (no NPs application)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1278 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticles had a beneficial effect on stomatal conductance, transpiration rate and photosynthetic rate of wheat compared with control.

Treatment
NPse3
Outcome
stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and photosynthetic ratee3
Direction
beneficial effecte3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nanoparticles enhanced morpho-physiological growth of wheat in contaminated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e3

“The results revealed that NPs have a beneficial effect on stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and photosynthetic rate compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1423 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticle application decreased Cd concentration in wheat roots by 36%.

Organ / stage
rootse4
Treatment
application of NPse4
Outcome
Cd concentratione4
Direction
decreasede4
Value
36%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nanoparticles enhanced morpho-physiological growth of wheat in contaminated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e4

“The Cd concentration in various plant parts viz. roots, shoot and grains decreased by 36%, 35% and 69% after the application of NPs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticle application decreased Cd concentration in wheat shoots by 35%.

Organ / stage
shoote4
Treatment
application of NPse4
Outcome
Cd concentratione4
Direction
decreasede4
Value
35%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nanoparticles enhanced morpho-physiological growth of wheat in contaminated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e4

“The Cd concentration in various plant parts viz. roots, shoot and grains decreased by 36%, 35% and 69% after the application of NPs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticle application decreased Cd concentration in wheat grains by 69%.

Organ / stage
grainse4
Treatment
application of NPse4
Outcome
Cd concentratione4
Direction
decreasede4
Value
69%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nanoparticles enhanced morpho-physiological growth of wheat in contaminated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e4

“The Cd concentration in various plant parts viz. roots, shoot and grains decreased by 36%, 35% and 69% after the application of NPs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe nanoparticles reduced Cd accumulation more distinctly at 5 mg kg-1 Cd than Zn and Si nanoparticles.

Treatment
Fe-NPse5
Outcome
reductione5
Direction
more distincte5
Qualifier
at 5 mg kg-1 Cde5
Comparator
Zn-NPS and Si-NPse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nanoparticles enhanced morpho-physiological growth of wheat in contaminated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, this reduction was more distinct at 5 mg kg-1 Cd with Fe-NPs followed by Zn-NPS and Si-NPs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1558–1657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticles were concluded to enhance wheat plant biomass.

Treatment
NPse6
Outcome
plant biomasse6
Direction
enhancemente6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nanoparticles enhanced morpho-physiological growth of wheat in contaminated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e6

“Overall, it was concluded that NPs play a significant role in the enhancement of plant biomass, increase in nutrient availability, and decrease the Cd accumulation in different plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1659–1847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticles were concluded to increase nutrient availability in contaminated soil.

Treatment
NPse6
Outcome
nutrient availabilitye6
Direction
increasee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nanoparticles enhanced morpho-physiological growth of wheat in contaminated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e6

“Overall, it was concluded that NPs play a significant role in the enhancement of plant biomass, increase in nutrient availability, and decrease the Cd accumulation in different plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1659–1847 · show in text ↑

iron atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

54 papers: 41 positive, 13 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

silicon atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

81 papers: 74 positive, 7 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

200 papers: 155 positive, 45 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
    Wheat plants with low Mn or low Zn supply showed no growth differences from controls at the three harvests.

    Distribution and remobilization of Zn and Mn during grain development in wheat · 1994 · compared with controls (sufficient Zn and Mn)

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. negative

196 papers more in this group

See all 200 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 36 positive, 6 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 101 positive, 4 negative or no effect

100 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 146 positive, 22 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

256 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.