Abstract
A field experiment was initiated in 2018 at ICAR-IISR Indore (MP), to study the effect of crop establishment techniques and agronomic biofortification methods on grain yield, crop and soil quality aspects under long-term conservation agriculture (CA) based soybean-wheat cropping system. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with two crop establishment techniques and eight agronomic biofortification methods. The results revealed that significantly higher grain yield, lowest soil pH, highest available nutrients (DTPA-Zn and DTPA-Fe), increased soil enzyme (Dehydrogenase) of soybean and wheat under conservation tillage. Among different agronomic biofortification methods soil application of Zn+Fe (DTPA-Zn and DTPA-Fe) reported significantly higher grain yield, compared to control. However, seed inoculation of microbial strains MDSR 14 + MDSR 34 reported significantly lowest soil pH, highest soil enzyme. Soybean and wheat grain phytic acid/Zn (<15) and phytic acid/Fe (<10) molar ratio was found significantly lower under conservation tillage and foliar application of Zn+Fe. Thus, in long term, adaptation of conservation tillage along with soil or foliar application of Zn+Fe and seed inoculation of MDSR 14 + MDSR 34 could be prominent options to improve yield, soil and crop quality parameters under CA based soybean-wheat cropping system.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Conservation tillage significantly increased soybean and wheat grain yield.
- Taxon
- soybean and wheat
Glycine max
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- conservation tillagee0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly higher grain yield, lowest soil pH, highest available nutrients (DTPA-Zn and DTPA-Fe), increased soil enzyme (Dehydrogenase) of soybean and wheat under conservation tillage.”
Claim · model-written summary
Conservation tillage produced the lowest soil pH in the soybean-wheat system.
- Taxon
- soybean and wheatGlycine maxTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- conservation tillagee0
- Outcome
- soil pHe0
- Direction
- loweste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lowest soil pH, highest available nutrients (DTPA-Zn and DTPA-Fe), increased soil enzyme (Dehydrogenase) of soybean and wheat under conservation tillage.”
Claim · model-written summary
Conservation tillage produced the highest available soil DTPA-Zn and DTPA-Fe.
- Taxon
- soybean and wheatGlycine maxTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- conservation tillagee0
- Outcome
- available nutrients (DTPA-Zn and DTPA-Fe)e0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest available nutrients (DTPA-Zn and DTPA-Fe), increased soil enzyme (Dehydrogenase) of soybean and wheat under conservation tillage.”
Claim · model-written summary
Conservation tillage increased soil dehydrogenase.
- Taxon
- soybean and wheatGlycine maxTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- conservation tillagee0
- Outcome
- soil enzyme (Dehydrogenase)e0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increased soil enzyme (Dehydrogenase) of soybean and wheat under conservation tillage.”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil Zn and Fe application significantly raised grain yield compared with control.
Verbatim
e0“soil application of Zn+Fe (DTPA-Zn and DTPA-Fe) reported significantly higher grain yield, compared to control.”
e1“CA) based soybean-wheat cropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
MDSR 14 plus MDSR 34 seed inoculation significantly lowered soil pH.
- Taxon
- soybean-wheate1
- Treatment
- seed inoculation of microbial strains MDSR 14 + MDSR 34e0
- Interactor
- microbial strains MDSR 14 + MDSR 34e0symbiont
- Outcome
- soil pHe0
- Direction
- loweste0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“seed inoculation of microbial strains MDSR 14 + MDSR 34 reported significantly lowest soil pH, highest soil enzyme.”
e1“CA) based soybean-wheat cropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
MDSR 14 plus MDSR 34 seed inoculation gave the highest soil enzyme result.
- Taxon
- soybean-wheate1
- Treatment
- seed inoculation of microbial strains MDSR 14 + MDSR 34e0
- Interactor
- microbial strains MDSR 14 + MDSR 34e0symbiont
- Outcome
- soil enzymee0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“seed inoculation of microbial strains MDSR 14 + MDSR 34 reported significantly lowest soil pH, highest soil enzyme.”
e1“CA) based soybean-wheat cropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
Conservation tillage and foliar Zn and Fe lowered soybean and wheat grain phytic acid to Zn ratios below 15.
- Taxon
- Soybean and wheatGlycine maxTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- conservation tillage and foliar application of Zn+Fee0
- Outcome
- grain phytic acid/Zne0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- <15e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soybean and wheat grain phytic acid/Zn (<15) and phytic acid/Fe (<10) molar ratio was found significantly lower under conservation tillage and foliar application of Zn+Fe.”
Claim · model-written summary
Conservation tillage and foliar Zn and Fe lowered soybean and wheat grain phytic acid to Fe ratios below 10.
- Taxon
- Soybean and wheatGlycine maxTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- conservation tillage and foliar application of Zn+Fee0
- Outcome
- phytic acid/Fee0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- <10e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soybean and wheat grain phytic acid/Zn (<15) and phytic acid/Fe (<10) molar ratio was found significantly lower under conservation tillage and foliar application of Zn+Fe.”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
107 papers more in this group
See all 111 papers →zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →iron atom · molecular: metabolites · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →iron atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →tillage · molecular: metabolites · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →tillage · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →application · molecular: metabolites · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
46 papers more in this group
See all 50 papers →tillage · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
53 papers more in this group
See all 57 papers →8 of 14 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.