Paper · 2024 · Agricultural science Euro-North-East

Prospects for the use of various species and strains of symbiotic bacteria (Xenorhabdus sp.) in the biological protection of potatoes from diseases in the European North of Russia

Z. P. Kotova; T. A. Danilova; L. G. Danilov; et al.

10
claims
24
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Research on the development of environmentally friendly plant protection systems against fungal pathogens using symbiotic bacteria Xenorhabdus sp. – symbionts of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) has been a new direction in agricultural practice in recent years and undoubtedly represent relevance and scientific significance. The studies used suspensions of live and autoclaved cultures of symbiotic bacteria of symbionts of various types of EPN (Steinernema carpocapsae, S. feltiae and S. feltiae protense) with a bacterial cell titer of 10 7 CFU/ml in comparison with the biological preparation Phytosporin-M (dough) and water as a control. In laboratory conditions at a temperature of 25 o C, there were established differences in the antibiotic activity of the primary forms of producers of Xenorhabdus sp., isolated from different types of EPN. The greatest inhibition of the fungal growth zone on the 4th day was observed for metabolites of the S. carpocapsae strain against Alternaria solani. Biological effectiveness in suppressing this pathogen was 51 %. Field research conducted in 2022-2023 in the conditions of the Republic of Karelia on the mid-early potato variety ʻRed Scarlettʼ, showed that under epiphytotic conditions (low air temperatures and excessive waterlogging) double spraying of vegetative plants with a suspension of live and autoclaved cultures of symbiotic bacteria (EPN-1-1, EPN-2 and EPN-2 -1) reduced the development of rhizoctoniosis compared to the control variant by 50, 64 and 60 %, respectively. It was found that double treatment with a live and autoclaved aqueous suspension of bacteria, symbionts of the subspecies S. feltiae was more effective and ensured a reduction in the degree of development of scab symptoms by 1.3–2.8 times and the spread of rhizoctonia by 1.5–2.0 times. It has been also established that 2-fold spraying of plants with a live and autoclaved suspension of symbiotic bacteria S. feltiae during the growing season significantly increases the yield of tubers by 35–22 %, respectively. Thus, the use of biologically active secondary metabolites of Xenorhabdus sp. has significant potential as biological plant protection agents against potato pathogens.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metabolites of the S. carpocapsae strain gave the greatest inhibition of Alternaria solani growth zone on day 4.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
metabolites of the S. carpocapsae straine1
Interactor
Alternaria solaniAlternaria solanie1pathogen
Second interactor
S. carpocapsaeSteinernema carpocapsaee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fungal growth zonee1
Direction
greatest inhibitione1
Qualifier
on the 4th daye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria solani
Alternaria solani · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Steinernema carpocapsae
Steinernema carpocapsae · Second interactorMirayana M. Barros, Dennis Chang, Dihong Lu, and Adler R. Dillman · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–133 · show in text ↑
e1

“The greatest inhibition of the fungal growth zone on the 4th day was observed for metabolites of the S. carpocapsae strain against Alternaria solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metabolites of the S. carpocapsae strain suppressed Alternaria solani with a biological effectiveness of 51 %.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
metabolites of the S. carpocapsae straine1
Interactor
Alternaria solaniAlternaria solanie1pathogen
Second interactor
S. carpocapsaeSteinernema carpocapsaee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Biological effectivenesse2
Direction
suppressinge2
Value
51 %e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria solani
Alternaria solani · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Steinernema carpocapsae
Steinernema carpocapsae · Second interactorMirayana M. Barros, Dennis Chang, Dihong Lu, and Adler R. Dillman · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–133 · show in text ↑
e1

“The greatest inhibition of the fungal growth zone on the 4th day was observed for metabolites of the S. carpocapsae strain against Alternaria solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–998 · show in text ↑
e2

“Biological effectiveness in suppressing this pathogen was 51 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double spraying with live and autoclaved symbiotic bacteria (EPN-1-1) reduced rhizoctoniosis development by 50 % relative to the control in 2022-2023 field trials.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Material
Red Scarlette7
Treatment
double spraying of vegetative plants with a suspension of live and autoclaved cultures of symbiotic bacteriae3
Interactor
rhizoctoniosise3pathogen
Second interactor
symbiotic bacteriae3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
development of rhizoctoniosise3
Direction
reducede3
Value
50e3
Qualifier
epiphytotic conditionse3
Comparator
control variante3
Setting
Republic of Kareliae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–133 · show in text ↑
e3

“under epiphytotic conditions (low air temperatures and excessive waterlogging) double spraying of vegetative plants with a suspension of live and autoclaved cultures of symbiotic bacteria (EPN-1-1, EPN-2 and EPN-2 -1) reduced the development of rhizoctoniosis compared to the control variant by 50, 64 and 60 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1531 · show in text ↑
e7

“Field research conducted in 2022-2023 in the conditions of the Republic of Karelia on the mid-early potato variety ʻRed Scarlettʼ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double spraying with live and autoclaved symbiotic bacteria (EPN-2) reduced rhizoctoniosis development by 64 % relative to the control in 2022-2023 field trials.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Material
Red Scarlette7
Treatment
double spraying of vegetative plants with a suspension of live and autoclaved cultures of symbiotic bacteriae3
Interactor
rhizoctoniosise3pathogen
Second interactor
symbiotic bacteriae3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
development of rhizoctoniosise3
Direction
reducede3
Value
64e3
Qualifier
epiphytotic conditionse3
Comparator
control variante3
Setting
Republic of Kareliae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–133 · show in text ↑
e3

“under epiphytotic conditions (low air temperatures and excessive waterlogging) double spraying of vegetative plants with a suspension of live and autoclaved cultures of symbiotic bacteria (EPN-1-1, EPN-2 and EPN-2 -1) reduced the development of rhizoctoniosis compared to the control variant by 50, 64 and 60 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1531 · show in text ↑
e7

“Field research conducted in 2022-2023 in the conditions of the Republic of Karelia on the mid-early potato variety ʻRed Scarlettʼ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double spraying with live and autoclaved symbiotic bacteria (EPN-2 -1) reduced rhizoctoniosis development by 60 % relative to the control in 2022-2023 field trials.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Material
Red Scarlette7
Treatment
double spraying of vegetative plants with a suspension of live and autoclaved cultures of symbiotic bacteriae3
Interactor
rhizoctoniosise3pathogen
Second interactor
symbiotic bacteriae3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
development of rhizoctoniosise3
Direction
reducede3
Value
60e3
Qualifier
epiphytotic conditionse3
Comparator
control variante3
Setting
Republic of Kareliae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–133 · show in text ↑
e3

“under epiphytotic conditions (low air temperatures and excessive waterlogging) double spraying of vegetative plants with a suspension of live and autoclaved cultures of symbiotic bacteria (EPN-1-1, EPN-2 and EPN-2 -1) reduced the development of rhizoctoniosis compared to the control variant by 50, 64 and 60 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1531 · show in text ↑
e7

“Field research conducted in 2022-2023 in the conditions of the Republic of Karelia on the mid-early potato variety ʻRed Scarlettʼ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double treatment with live and autoclaved S. feltiae bacteria was more effective and reduced the degree of scab symptoms 1.3-2.8 times.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
double treatment with a live and autoclaved aqueous suspension of bacteriae4
Interactor
scabe4pathogen
Second interactor
S. feltiaeSteinernema feltiaee4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
degree of development of scab symptomse4
Direction
reductione4
Value
1.3–2.8 timese4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Steinernema feltiae
Steinernema feltiae · Second interactorTony Coulson · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–133 · show in text ↑
e4

“double treatment with a live and autoclaved aqueous suspension of bacteria, symbionts of the subspecies S. feltiae was more effective and ensured a reduction in the degree of development of scab symptoms by 1.3–2.8 times and the spread of rhizoctonia by 1.5–2.0 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double treatment with live and autoclaved S. feltiae bacteria reduced the spread of rhizoctonia 1.5-2.0 times.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
double treatment with a live and autoclaved aqueous suspension of bacteriae4
Interactor
rhizoctoniaRhizoctoniae4pathogen
Second interactor
S. feltiaeSteinernema feltiaee4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
spread of rhizoctoniae4
Direction
reductione4
Value
1.5–2.0 timese4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Steinernema feltiae
Steinernema feltiae · Second interactorTony Coulson · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–133 · show in text ↑
e4

“double treatment with a live and autoclaved aqueous suspension of bacteria, symbionts of the subspecies S. feltiae was more effective and ensured a reduction in the degree of development of scab symptoms by 1.3–2.8 times and the spread of rhizoctonia by 1.5–2.0 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-fold spraying with live S. feltiae bacteria significantly increased tuber yield by 35 %.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
2-fold spraying of plants with a live and autoclaved suspension of symbiotic bacteria S. feltiaee5
Outcome
yield of tuberse5
Direction
increasese5
Value
35e5
Qualifier
livee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–133 · show in text ↑
e5

“2-fold spraying of plants with a live and autoclaved suspension of symbiotic bacteria S. feltiae during the growing season significantly increases the yield of tubers by 35–22 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1854–2045 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-fold spraying with autoclaved S. feltiae bacteria significantly increased tuber yield by 22 %.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
2-fold spraying of plants with a live and autoclaved suspension of symbiotic bacteria S. feltiaee5
Outcome
yield of tuberse5
Direction
increasese5
Value
22e5
Qualifier
autoclavede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–133 · show in text ↑
e5

“2-fold spraying of plants with a live and autoclaved suspension of symbiotic bacteria S. feltiae during the growing season significantly increases the yield of tubers by 35–22 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1854–2045 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest secondary metabolites of Xenorhabdus sp. have significant potential as biological plant protection agents against potato pathogens.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Outcome
biological plant protection agentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–133 · show in text ↑
e6

“the use of biologically active secondary metabolites of Xenorhabdus sp. has significant potential as biological plant protection agents against potato pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2053–2213 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Rhizoctonia · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 71 positive, 7 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

inoculation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 80 positive, 13 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

104 papers: 82 positive, 22 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

inoculation · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

113 papers: 53 positive, 60 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

application · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

191 papers: 177 positive, 14 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

187 papers more in this group

See all 191 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.