Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Assessment of tillage practices and weed management methods in wheat crop at Bundelkhand region

Shalini .; Vister Joshi; SP Sonkar

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An On farm trails were conducted to assess the tillage practices and weed management methods on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at Krishi Vigyan Kendra Hamirpur, district of Bundelkhand Uttar Pradesh during Rabi 2019-20 and 2020-21. Two weed control methods and two tillage practices were taken with and without herbicide application in RBD. The result showed that Conventional tillage with two hand weeding (20 and 40 DAS) provided excellent control of all the weed species and this treatment was found non-significant with conservation tillage+ POE (Clodinafop propargyl 15%+Metsufuron methyl 1% W.P). Sowing of wheat with conservation tillage and application of Clodinafop propargyl 15%+Metsufuron methyl 1% W.P. had exhibited a significant effect on grain yield (56.48q) and straw yield of wheat during both the years of experimentation. However this treatment was found statistically at par with hand weeding treatment (54.88q) and conventional tillage + POE. The average cost of cultivation of wheat sown with conventional tillage plus hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAS (Rs. 45630) was recorded highest, followed by Conventional tillage with POE. The benefit: cost ratio was found to be maximum (5.98) under wheat sown with Conservation tillage and Post emergence application of herbicide, While lower was recorded with Conventional tillage plus twice hand weeding (3.84).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with two hand weedings controlled all weed species well and was statistically comparable to conservation tillage plus herbicide.

Treatment
Conventional tillage with two hand weeding (20 and 40 DAS)e0
Interactor
weed speciese0weed
Outcome
control of all the weed speciese0
Direction
excellente0
Comparator
conservation tillage+ POE (Clodinafop propargyl 15%+Metsufuron methyl 1% W.P)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage with two hand weeding (20 and 40 DAS) provided excellent control of all the weed species and this treatment was found non-significant with conservation tillage+ POE (Clodinafop propargyl 15%+Metsufuron methyl 1% W.P)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage with the herbicide significantly affected wheat grain yield, reported as 56.48q.

Treatment
conservation tillage and application of Clodinafop propargyl 15%+Metsufuron methyl 1% W.P.e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
56.48qe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sowing of wheat with conservation tillage and application of Clodinafop propargyl 15%+Metsufuron methyl 1% W.P. had exhibited a significant effect on grain yield (56.48q) and straw yield of wheat during both the years of experimentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage with the herbicide significantly affected wheat straw yield.

Treatment
conservation tillage and application of Clodinafop propargyl 15%+Metsufuron methyl 1% W.P.e0
Outcome
straw yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sowing of wheat with conservation tillage and application of Clodinafop propargyl 15%+Metsufuron methyl 1% W.P. had exhibited a significant effect on grain yield (56.48q) and straw yield of wheat during both the years of experimentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–837 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage plus twice hand weeding had the highest cultivation cost, Rs. 45630.

Treatment
conventional tillage plus hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 DASe0
Outcome
cost of cultivatione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs. 45630e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average cost of cultivation of wheat sown with conventional tillage plus hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAS (Rs. 45630) was recorded highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage with post-emergence herbicide had the maximum benefit:cost ratio of 5.98.

Treatment
Conservation tillage and Post emergence application of herbicidee0
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5.98e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The benefit: cost ratio was found to be maximum (5.98) under wheat sown with Conservation tillage and Post emergence application of herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1293 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage plus twice hand weeding had a lower benefit:cost ratio of 3.84.

Treatment
Conventional tillage plus twice hand weedinge0
Outcome
lowere0
Direction
lowere0
Value
3.84e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower was recorded with Conventional tillage plus twice hand weeding (3.84)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑

clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 41 positive, 4 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 37 positive, 4 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

tillage · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

183 papers: 126 positive, 57 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

179 papers more in this group

See all 183 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.