Abstract
A field experiment was conducted on sandy loam soil during 2022-23 and 2023-24 at Agricultural farm of the Mahatama Gandhi Chitrakoot Gramodaya Vishwavidyalaya Chirtakoot, Satna, (M.P.) to evaluate the effect of residue management practices on yield attributes and yield of maize. Treatment consisted five residue management practices viz., residue removal, residue incorporation, residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residue, zero tillage with residue retention and spray of microbial consortium on residue and zero tillage with spray of paraquat. Results revealed that on pooled basis of two years the yield attributes viz., cob length (17.79 cm), cob grith (14.35 cm), cob weight per cob (199.68 g), seed weight per cob (160. 11 g), seed number.cob (485.38), number of grains row per cob (13.58), number of grains per row (36.16), seed index (25.47 g) and shelling percentage (80.10%) were significantly maximum in residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residue treatment. Significantly highest grain yield (10821 kg/ha), straw yield (18341 kg/ha) and protein content (10.15 kg/ha) were obtained under residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residue treatment. While, harvest index was obtained significantly higher (37.70%) under Zero tillage with spray of Paraquat treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
cob length was significantly maximal with residue incorporation and microbial consortium spray.
- Treatment
- residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residuee0
- Outcome
- cob lengthe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 17.79 cme0
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Results revealed that on pooled basis of two years the yield attributes viz., cob length (17.79 cm), cob grith (14.35 cm), cob weight per cob (199.68 g), seed weight per cob (160. 11 g), seed number.cob (485.38), number of grains row per cob (13.58), number of grains per row (36.16), seed index (25.47 g) and shelling percentage (80.10%) were significantly maximum in residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residue treatment.”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
cob grith was significantly maximal with residue incorporation and microbial consortium spray.
- Treatment
- residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residuee0
- Outcome
- cob grithe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 14.35 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Results revealed that on pooled basis of two years the yield attributes viz., cob length (17.79 cm), cob grith (14.35 cm), cob weight per cob (199.68 g), seed weight per cob (160. 11 g), seed number.cob (485.38), number of grains row per cob (13.58), number of grains per row (36.16), seed index (25.47 g) and shelling percentage (80.10%) were significantly maximum in residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residue treatment.”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
cob weight per cob was significantly maximal with residue incorporation and microbial consortium spray.
- Treatment
- residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residuee0
- Outcome
- cob weight per cobe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 199.68 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Results revealed that on pooled basis of two years the yield attributes viz., cob length (17.79 cm), cob grith (14.35 cm), cob weight per cob (199.68 g), seed weight per cob (160. 11 g), seed number.cob (485.38), number of grains row per cob (13.58), number of grains per row (36.16), seed index (25.47 g) and shelling percentage (80.10%) were significantly maximum in residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residue treatment.”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
seed weight per cob was significantly maximal with residue incorporation and microbial consortium spray.
- Treatment
- residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residuee0
- Outcome
- seed weight per cobe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 160. 11 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Results revealed that on pooled basis of two years the yield attributes viz., cob length (17.79 cm), cob grith (14.35 cm), cob weight per cob (199.68 g), seed weight per cob (160. 11 g), seed number.cob (485.38), number of grains row per cob (13.58), number of grains per row (36.16), seed index (25.47 g) and shelling percentage (80.10%) were significantly maximum in residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residue treatment.”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
seed number.cob was significantly maximal with residue incorporation and microbial consortium spray.
- Treatment
- residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residuee0
- Outcome
- seed number.cobe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 485.38e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Results revealed that on pooled basis of two years the yield attributes viz., cob length (17.79 cm), cob grith (14.35 cm), cob weight per cob (199.68 g), seed weight per cob (160. 11 g), seed number.cob (485.38), number of grains row per cob (13.58), number of grains per row (36.16), seed index (25.47 g) and shelling percentage (80.10%) were significantly maximum in residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residue treatment.”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
number of grains row per cob was significantly maximal with residue incorporation and microbial consortium spray.
- Treatment
- residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residuee0
- Outcome
- number of grains row per cobe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 13.58e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Results revealed that on pooled basis of two years the yield attributes viz., cob length (17.79 cm), cob grith (14.35 cm), cob weight per cob (199.68 g), seed weight per cob (160. 11 g), seed number.cob (485.38), number of grains row per cob (13.58), number of grains per row (36.16), seed index (25.47 g) and shelling percentage (80.10%) were significantly maximum in residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residue treatment.”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
number of grains per row was significantly maximal with residue incorporation and microbial consortium spray.
- Treatment
- residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residuee0
- Outcome
- number of grains per rowe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 36.16e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Results revealed that on pooled basis of two years the yield attributes viz., cob length (17.79 cm), cob grith (14.35 cm), cob weight per cob (199.68 g), seed weight per cob (160. 11 g), seed number.cob (485.38), number of grains row per cob (13.58), number of grains per row (36.16), seed index (25.47 g) and shelling percentage (80.10%) were significantly maximum in residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residue treatment.”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
seed index was significantly maximal with residue incorporation and microbial consortium spray.
- Treatment
- residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residuee0
- Outcome
- seed indexe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 25.47 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Results revealed that on pooled basis of two years the yield attributes viz., cob length (17.79 cm), cob grith (14.35 cm), cob weight per cob (199.68 g), seed weight per cob (160. 11 g), seed number.cob (485.38), number of grains row per cob (13.58), number of grains per row (36.16), seed index (25.47 g) and shelling percentage (80.10%) were significantly maximum in residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residue treatment.”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
shelling percentage was significantly maximal with residue incorporation and microbial consortium spray.
- Treatment
- residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residuee0
- Outcome
- shelling percentagee0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 80.10%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Results revealed that on pooled basis of two years the yield attributes viz., cob length (17.79 cm), cob grith (14.35 cm), cob weight per cob (199.68 g), seed weight per cob (160. 11 g), seed number.cob (485.38), number of grains row per cob (13.58), number of grains per row (36.16), seed index (25.47 g) and shelling percentage (80.10%) were significantly maximum in residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residue treatment.”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
grain yield was significantly highest under residue incorporation and microbial consortium spray.
- Treatment
- residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residuee0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 10821 kg/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significantly highest grain yield (10821 kg/ha), straw yield (18341 kg/ha) and protein content (10.15 kg/ha) were obtained under residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residue treatment.”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
straw yield was significantly highest under residue incorporation and microbial consortium spray.
- Treatment
- residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residuee0
- Outcome
- straw yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 18341 kg/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significantly highest grain yield (10821 kg/ha), straw yield (18341 kg/ha) and protein content (10.15 kg/ha) were obtained under residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residue treatment.”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
protein content was significantly highest under residue incorporation and microbial consortium spray.
- Treatment
- residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residuee0
- Outcome
- protein contente0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 10.15 kg/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significantly highest grain yield (10821 kg/ha), straw yield (18341 kg/ha) and protein content (10.15 kg/ha) were obtained under residue incorporation with spray of microbial consortium on residue treatment.”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Harvest index was significantly higher under zero tillage with paraquat spray.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“While, harvest index was obtained significantly higher (37.70%) under Zero tillage with spray of Paraquat treatment.”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)”
The same questions in other papers
paraquat · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →organic · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →inoculation · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
45 papers more in this group
See all 49 papers →application · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
58 papers more in this group
See all 62 papers →organic · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
369 papers more in this group
See all 373 papers →inoculation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
478 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
534 papers more in this group
See all 538 papers →application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
574 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
625 papers more in this group
See all 629 papers →tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.