Abstract
Currently, there is an increasing demand for agricultural production, not only to meet high-quality supplies, but also to develop environmentally sustainable strategies. The inorganic fertilizers are required for stimulating plant growth and production; however, non-stop use of inorganic fertilizers is disturbing our soil and environment. So, we have to return to the beyond and use organic fertilizers due to the fact organic fertilizers have a clean improvement over chemical fertilizer. So, a research study was carried out to study the effect of BAIF Phosphate Rich Organic Manure (BAIF PROM) on chickpea-Okra cropping sequence. BAIF has developed Integrated Renewable Energy and Sustainable Agriculture (IRESA) model for production of an organic manure as a source of phosphorus. This is slow nutrient-releasing manure which helps to meet the demand of the ongoing crop as well as the succeeding crop. The field experiment was taken during the kharif and rabi season in 2021-22 and 2022-23. Among the various treatments, application of GRDF (100% P2O5 through BAIF PROM and N & K through chemical fertilizer) (T6) showed significantly higher chickpea and okra yields of 35.55 qha-1 and 18.37 MTha-1, respectively, whereas GRDF (T2) treatment recorded yield of 34.93 qha-1 and 17.71 MTha-1. It was found to be 1.73% and 2.16% higher compared to the application of GRDF (100% NPK chemical fertilizer along with FYM) (T2) in chickpea and okra, respectively (Table 9). The highest phosphorus use efficiency of 25.88% was observed by treatment (T6) in chickpea, and 32.55% was recorded by treatment T5 in okra. The maximum organic carbon content of 0.62% and 0.64% was found in treatment (T6) in chickpea and okra, respectively, over the initial content of 0.59%. Maximum benefit cost ratio of 3.45 was recorded in treatment (T3) with application of 100% P2O5 through BAIF PROM along with FYM whereas treatment (T5) with 60% P2O5 through BAIF PROM and N & K through chemical fertilizer was found at par with B: C ratio of 3.44 in chickpea and okra cropping sequence. The B: C ratio of 2.24 was found in treatment RDF through chemical fertilizer (T2).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
T6 produced a chickpea yield of 35.55 qha-1, significantly above T2.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- 100% P2O5 through BAIF PROM and N & K through chemical fertilizere0
- Outcome
- chickpea and okra yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 35.55 qha-1e0
- Comparator
- GRDF (T2)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of GRDF (100% P2O5 through BAIF PROM and N & K through chemical fertilizer) (T6) showed significantly higher chickpea and okra yields of 35.55 qha-1 and 18.37 MTha-1, respectively, whereas GRDF (T2) treatment recorded yield of 34.93 qha-1 and 17.71 MTha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 produced an okra yield of 18.37 MTha-1, significantly above T2.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentuse0 - Treatment
- 100% P2O5 through BAIF PROM and N & K through chemical fertilizere0
- Outcome
- chickpea and okra yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 18.37 MTha-1e0
- Comparator
- GRDF (T2)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“application of GRDF (100% P2O5 through BAIF PROM and N & K through chemical fertilizer) (T6) showed significantly higher chickpea and okra yields of 35.55 qha-1 and 18.37 MTha-1, respectively, whereas GRDF (T2) treatment recorded yield of 34.93 qha-1 and 17.71 MTha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
Chickpea yield under T6 was 1.73% higher than under T2.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- BAIF PROMe1
- Outcome
- chickpeae0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.73%e0
- Comparator
- 100% NPK chemical fertilizer along with FYMe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It was found to be 1.73% and 2.16% higher compared to the application of GRDF (100% NPK chemical fertilizer along with FYM) (T2) in chickpea and okra, respectively”
e1“effect of BAIF Phosphate Rich Organic Manure (BAIF PROM)”
Claim · model-written summary
Okra yield under T6 was 2.16% higher than under T2.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- BAIF PROMe1
- Outcome
- okrae0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2.16%e0
- Comparator
- 100% NPK chemical fertilizer along with FYMe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It was found to be 1.73% and 2.16% higher compared to the application of GRDF (100% NPK chemical fertilizer along with FYM) (T2) in chickpea and okra, respectively”
e1“effect of BAIF Phosphate Rich Organic Manure (BAIF PROM)”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 had the highest chickpea phosphorus use efficiency at 25.88%.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- T6e0
- Outcome
- phosphorus use efficiencye0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 25.88%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest phosphorus use efficiency of 25.88% was observed by treatment (T6) in chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 had the highest okra phosphorus use efficiency at 32.55%.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- T5e0
- Outcome
- phosphorus use efficiencye1
- Value
- 32.55%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“32.55% was recorded by treatment T5 in okra”
e1“The highest phosphorus use efficiency of 25.88% was observed by treatment (T6) in chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 gave chickpea soil organic carbon of 0.62%, above the initial 0.59%.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- T6e0
- Outcome
- organic carbon contente0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 0.62%e0
- Qualifier
- initial content of 0.59%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum organic carbon content of 0.62% and 0.64% was found in treatment (T6) in chickpea and okra, respectively, over the initial content of 0.59%.”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 gave okra soil organic carbon of 0.64%, above the initial 0.59%.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- T6e0
- Outcome
- organic carbon contente0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 0.64%e0
- Qualifier
- initial content of 0.59%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum organic carbon content of 0.62% and 0.64% was found in treatment (T6) in chickpea and okra, respectively, over the initial content of 0.59%.”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 produced the maximum benefit-cost ratio of 3.45.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum benefit cost ratio of 3.45 was recorded in treatment (T3) with application of 100% P2O5 through BAIF PROM along with FYM”
t0“chickpea-okra cropping sequence”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 had an at-par benefit-cost ratio of 3.44.
- Taxon
- chickpea and okraCicer arietinumAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- 60% P2O5 through BAIF PROM and N & K through chemical fertilizere0
- Outcome
- B: C ratioe0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Value
- 3.44e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment (T5) with 60% P2O5 through BAIF PROM and N & K through chemical fertilizer was found at par with B: C ratio of 3.44 in chickpea and okra cropping sequence”
Claim · model-written summary
T2 had a benefit-cost ratio of 2.24.
Verbatim
e0“The B: C ratio of 2.24 was found in treatment RDF through chemical fertilizer (T2).”
t0“chickpea-okra cropping sequence”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results differ
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →nitrogen · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results differ
78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
78 papers more in this group
See all 82 papers →nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
98 papers more in this group
See all 102 papers →phosphorus · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
160 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
164 papers more in this group
See all 168 papers →fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
341 papers more in this group
See all 345 papers →fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
354 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
369 papers more in this group
See all 373 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.