Paper · 2025 · JOURNAL OF SOIL BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY

Synergistic effects of NPK bacteria, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and biochar on tomato seedling growth and organic carbon in substrate

VAISHNAVI M.R.; ASHWIN R; BAGYARAJ D.J.

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The combined application of NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar significantly enhanced tomato seedling growth and soil health indicators. The highest shoot and root lengths were recorded under this treatment, attributed to the complementary roles of NPK in nutrient availability, AMF in phosphorus uptake and root vigor, and biochar in improving substrate structure and nutrient retention. Stem diameter, biovolume index, fresh and dry weights also improved notably with this combination, reflecting increased biomass accumulation and plant vigor. Microbial parameters supported these trends. The highest rhizosphere bacterial population was observed in the NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar treatment, indicating that biochar offered a stable microhabitat that, along with nutrient input and AMF-induced root exudates, enhanced bacterial proliferation in the rhizosphere. Similarly, mycorrhizal colonization peaked in this treatment, reflecting favorable conditions created by biochar and nutrient synergy for AMF establishment. Importantly, NPK (%) and organic carbon (OC%) content was highest in the shoot of the NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar treatment, followed by AMF + Biochar and NPK bacteria + Biochar. This increase suggests enhanced soil organic matter retention due to biochar’s inherent carbon content and AMF-stimulated root biomass, contributing to improved soil fertility and structure. NPK bacteria alone contributed significantly to nutrient availability and early plant growth by supplying essential macronutrients (N, P, and K) in readily available forms. However, its efficiency was substantially enhanced when combined with AMF and/or biochar, which improved nutrient uptake dynamics, Mycorrhizal root colonization, and microbial interactions in the substrate. These results underscore the value of integrating microbial inoculants with biochar in pro-tray systems to sustainably boost early seedling development and substrate quality. Keywords: AMF, Biochar, Biofertilizer organisms, Carbon fixation, Soil organic carbon, References Adelman, S. and Morton, J., 1986. The most probable number method for estimating infective propagules of mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biol. Biochem., 1: 77-83. Atakan, A. and Özkaya, H.Ö., 2021. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and glomalin. Turkish J Agric. Food Sci. Technol., 9(12): 2371–2375. Babalola, O. O. and Glick, B. R., 2012. Role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in sustainable agriculture. J. Agric. Food Chem., 60(29): 7327–7333. Bagyaraj, D. J., 2011. Microbial biotechnology for sustainable agriculture, horticulture & forestry. New India Publishing Agency. Bagyaraj, D. J., 2014. Mycorrhizal fungi. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy, 80(2): 415–428. Barnes, R. B., Richardson, D., Berry, J. W. and Hood, R. L., 1945. Flame photometry—a rapid analytical procedure. Ind. Engineer. Chem. Anal. Ed., 17(10): 605–611. Biederman, L. A. and Harpole, W. S., 2013. Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: A meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy, 5(2): 202–214. Desai, S., Bagyaraj, D. J. and Ashwin, R., 2020. Inoculation with microbial consortium promotes growth of tomato and capsicum seedlings raised in pro trays. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., India Sec. B: Biol. Sci., 90(1), 21–28. Giovannetti, M. and Mosse, B., 1980. An evaluation of techniques to measure vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytol., 84(3), 489–500. Glaser, B., Lehmann, J. and Zech, W., 2002. Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal: A review. Biol. Fert. Soils, 35: 219–230. Ortaş, İ., 2016. The role of mycorrhizae and biochar in plant growth and soil quality. In: Biochar: A regional supply chain approach in view of climate change mitigation, (Eds. Viktor J. Bruckman, E.A. Varol, B. B. Uzun & J Liu), Cambridge University Press, pp. 336-350. Jackson, M. L., 1983. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd. Johnson, L. F. and Curl, E. A., 1972. Methods for research on the ecology of soil-borne plant pathogens. Burgess Publishing Co., Minneapolis, USA. Kjeldahl, J. G., 1883. Neue Methode zur Bestimmung des Stickstoffs in organischen Körpern. Zeitschrift für Analytische Chemie, 22(1), 366–382. Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S., 2015. Biochar for environmental management: Science, technology and implementation (2nd ed.). Routledge, London. Liu, J., Schulz, H., Brandl, S., Miehtke, H., Huwe, B. and Glaser, B., 2017. Short-term effect of biochar and compost on soil fertility and water status of a Dystric Cambisol in NE Germany under field conditions. J. Plant Nut. Soil Sci., 180(3): 466–475. Philips, J. M. and Hayman, D. S., 1970. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Tr. Br. Mycol. Soc., 55: 158–161. Piper, C. S., 1966. Soil and plant analysis. Hans Publishers, Bombay. Premalatha, R. P., Poorna Bindu, J., Nivetha, E., Malarvizhi, P., Manorama, K., Parameswari, E. and Davamani, V., 2023. A review on biochar’s effect on soil properties and crop growth. Frontiers in Energy Research, 11, 1092637. Porter, W. M., 1979. The 'most probable number' method for enumerating infective propagules of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil. Soil Res., 17(3): 515–519. Priya, M., Kumutha, K. and Senthilkumar, M., 2019. Impact of bacterization of Rhizobium and Methylobacterium radiotolerans on germination and survivability in groundnut seed. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., 8: 394–405. Riaz, M., et al., 2019. Biochar enhances mycorrhizal colonization and nutrient uptake in plants. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 26(7): 6823–6834. Rillig, M. C., Wright, S. F., Nichols, K. A., Schmidt, W. F. and Torn, M. S., 2002. Large contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to soil carbon pools in tropical forest soils. Plant Soil, 233(2): 167–177. Smith, J. L., Collins, H. P. and Bailey, V. L., 2010. The effect of young biochar on soil respiration. Soil Biol. Biochem., 42(12): 2345–2347. Smith, S. E., and Read, D. J., 2008. Mycorrhizal symbiosis (3rd ed.). Academic Press, Massachusetts, USA. Solaiman, Z. M. and Blackwell, P., 2012. Mycorrhizal root colonisation and diversity in a biochar-amended soil. Soil Res., 50(8): 619–626. Stanley, N. R., Britton, R. A., Grossman, A. D. and Lazazzera, B. A., 2003. Identification of catabolite repression as a physiological regulator of biofilm formation by Bacillus subtilis by use of DNA microarrays. J. Bacteriol., 185(6): 1951–1957. Sukartono, U. W., Kusuma, Z. and Nugroho, W. H., 2011. Soil fertility status, nutrient uptake, and maize (Zea mays L.) yield following biochar and cattle manure application on sandy soils of Lombok, Indonesia. J. Trop. Agri., 49(1–2): 47–52. Toor, M. D. and Adnan, M., 2020. Role of soil microbes in agriculture: A review. Open Access J. Biol. Sci. Res., 3(5): 1–5. Warnock, D. D., Lehmann, J., Kuyper, T. W. and Rillig, M. C., 2007. Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil: Concepts and mechanisms. Plant Soil, 300(1): 9–20. Yaashikaa, P. R., Kumar, P. S., Varjani, S. and Saravanan, A. J., 2020. A critical review on the biochar production techniques, characterization, stability and applications for circular bioeconomy. Biotechnol. Rep., 28: e00570. Zhang, C., Wang, M. Y., Khan, N., Tan, L. L. and Yang, S., 2021. Potentials, utilization, and bioengineering of plant growth-promoting Methylobacterium for sustainable agriculture. Sustainability, 13(7): 3941.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK bacteria, AMF and biochar combined gave the highest shoot and root lengths of tomato seedlings.

Treatment
NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochare0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
NPK bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
shoot and root lengthse1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar significantly enhanced tomato seedling growth and soil health indicators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest shoot and root lengths were recorded under this treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK bacteria, AMF and biochar combined improved stem diameter and biovolume index of tomato seedlings.

Treatment
NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochare0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
NPK bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
Stem diameter, biovolume indexe1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar significantly enhanced tomato seedling growth and soil health indicators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Stem diameter, biovolume index, fresh and dry weights also improved notably with this combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–480 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK bacteria, AMF and biochar combined improved fresh and dry weights of tomato seedlings.

Treatment
NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochare0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
NPK bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
fresh and dry weightse1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar significantly enhanced tomato seedling growth and soil health indicators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Stem diameter, biovolume index, fresh and dry weights also improved notably with this combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–480 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest rhizosphere bacterial population was found under NPK bacteria, AMF and biochar combined.

Treatment
NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar treatmente1
Interactor
NPK bacteriae1symbiont
Second interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
rhizosphere bacterial populatione1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar significantly enhanced tomato seedling growth and soil health indicators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest rhizosphere bacterial population was observed in the NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal colonization peaked under NPK bacteria, AMF and biochar combined.

Treatment
NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochare0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
NPK bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
mycorrhizal colonizatione1
Direction
peakede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar significantly enhanced tomato seedling growth and soil health indicators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Similarly, mycorrhizal colonization peaked in this treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–921 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK (%) and organic carbon (OC%) content was highest in the shoot under NPK bacteria, AMF and biochar combined.

Organ / stage
shoote1
Treatment
NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochare1
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
NPK bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
NPK (%) and organic carbon (OC%) contente1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
AMF + Biochar and NPK bacteria + Biochare1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar significantly enhanced tomato seedling growth and soil health indicators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“NPK (%) and organic carbon (OC%) content was highest in the shoot of the NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar treatment, followed by AMF + Biochar and NPK bacteria + Biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1196 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK bacteria alone contributed significantly to nutrient availability and early growth of tomato seedlings.

Treatment
NPK bacteria alonee1
Interactor
NPK bacteriae1symbiont
Outcome
nutrient availability and early plant growthe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar significantly enhanced tomato seedling growth and soil health indicators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“NPK bacteria alone contributed significantly to nutrient availability and early plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The efficiency of NPK bacteria was substantially enhanced when combined with AMF and/or biochar.

Treatment
combined with AMF and/or biochare2
Interactor
AMFe2symbiont
Second interactor
NPK bacteriae1symbiont
Outcome
efficiencye2
Direction
enhancede2
Comparator
NPK bacteria alonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar significantly enhanced tomato seedling growth and soil health indicators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“NPK bacteria alone contributed significantly to nutrient availability and early plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1481 · show in text ↑
e2

“its efficiency was substantially enhanced when combined with AMF and/or biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining NPK bacteria with AMF and/or biochar improved nutrient uptake dynamics, mycorrhizal root colonization and microbial interactions in the substrate.

Treatment
combined with AMF and/or biochare2
Interactor
AMFe2symbiont
Second interactor
NPK bacteriae1symbiont
Outcome
nutrient uptake dynamics, Mycorrhizal root colonization, and microbial interactionse3
Direction
improvede3
Comparator
NPK bacteria alonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar significantly enhanced tomato seedling growth and soil health indicators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“NPK bacteria alone contributed significantly to nutrient availability and early plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1481 · show in text ↑
e2

“its efficiency was substantially enhanced when combined with AMF and/or biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1650 · show in text ↑
e3

“which improved nutrient uptake dynamics, Mycorrhizal root colonization, and microbial interactions in the substrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1767 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced soil organic matter retention under the combined treatment is suggested to be due to biochar carbon and AMF-stimulated root biomass.

Outcome
enhanced soil organic matter retentione1
Qualifier
due to biochar’s inherent carbon content and AMF-stimulated root biomasse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar significantly enhanced tomato seedling growth and soil health indicators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“This increase suggests enhanced soil organic matter retention due to biochar’s inherent carbon content and AMF-stimulated root biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1332 · show in text ↑

biochar · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

80 papers: 71 positive, 9 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

mycorrhiza · soil: chemistry · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

biochar · soil: chemistry · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

biochar · soil: biology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

inoculation · soil: biology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

mycorrhiza · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 31 positive, 6 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

8 of 16 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.