Abstract
The combined application of NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar significantly enhanced tomato seedling growth and soil health indicators. The highest shoot and root lengths were recorded under this treatment, attributed to the complementary roles of NPK in nutrient availability, AMF in phosphorus uptake and root vigor, and biochar in improving substrate structure and nutrient retention. Stem diameter, biovolume index, fresh and dry weights also improved notably with this combination, reflecting increased biomass accumulation and plant vigor. Microbial parameters supported these trends. The highest rhizosphere bacterial population was observed in the NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar treatment, indicating that biochar offered a stable microhabitat that, along with nutrient input and AMF-induced root exudates, enhanced bacterial proliferation in the rhizosphere. Similarly, mycorrhizal colonization peaked in this treatment, reflecting favorable conditions created by biochar and nutrient synergy for AMF establishment. Importantly, NPK (%) and organic carbon (OC%) content was highest in the shoot of the NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar treatment, followed by AMF + Biochar and NPK bacteria + Biochar. This increase suggests enhanced soil organic matter retention due to biochar’s inherent carbon content and AMF-stimulated root biomass, contributing to improved soil fertility and structure. NPK bacteria alone contributed significantly to nutrient availability and early plant growth by supplying essential macronutrients (N, P, and K) in readily available forms. However, its efficiency was substantially enhanced when combined with AMF and/or biochar, which improved nutrient uptake dynamics, Mycorrhizal root colonization, and microbial interactions in the substrate. These results underscore the value of integrating microbial inoculants with biochar in pro-tray systems to sustainably boost early seedling development and substrate quality. Keywords: AMF, Biochar, Biofertilizer organisms, Carbon fixation, Soil organic carbon, References Adelman, S. and Morton, J., 1986. The most probable number method for estimating infective propagules of mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biol. Biochem., 1: 77-83. Atakan, A. and Özkaya, H.Ö., 2021. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and glomalin. Turkish J Agric. Food Sci. Technol., 9(12): 2371–2375. Babalola, O. O. and Glick, B. R., 2012. Role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in sustainable agriculture. J. Agric. Food Chem., 60(29): 7327–7333. Bagyaraj, D. J., 2011. Microbial biotechnology for sustainable agriculture, horticulture & forestry. New India Publishing Agency. Bagyaraj, D. J., 2014. Mycorrhizal fungi. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy, 80(2): 415–428. Barnes, R. B., Richardson, D., Berry, J. W. and Hood, R. L., 1945. Flame photometry—a rapid analytical procedure. Ind. Engineer. Chem. Anal. Ed., 17(10): 605–611. Biederman, L. A. and Harpole, W. S., 2013. Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: A meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy, 5(2): 202–214. Desai, S., Bagyaraj, D. J. and Ashwin, R., 2020. Inoculation with microbial consortium promotes growth of tomato and capsicum seedlings raised in pro trays. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., India Sec. B: Biol. Sci., 90(1), 21–28. Giovannetti, M. and Mosse, B., 1980. An evaluation of techniques to measure vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytol., 84(3), 489–500. Glaser, B., Lehmann, J. and Zech, W., 2002. Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal: A review. Biol. Fert. Soils, 35: 219–230. Ortaş, İ., 2016. The role of mycorrhizae and biochar in plant growth and soil quality. In: Biochar: A regional supply chain approach in view of climate change mitigation, (Eds. Viktor J. Bruckman, E.A. Varol, B. B. Uzun & J Liu), Cambridge University Press, pp. 336-350. Jackson, M. L., 1983. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd. Johnson, L. F. and Curl, E. A., 1972. Methods for research on the ecology of soil-borne plant pathogens. Burgess Publishing Co., Minneapolis, USA. Kjeldahl, J. G., 1883. Neue Methode zur Bestimmung des Stickstoffs in organischen Körpern. Zeitschrift für Analytische Chemie, 22(1), 366–382. Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S., 2015. Biochar for environmental management: Science, technology and implementation (2nd ed.). Routledge, London. Liu, J., Schulz, H., Brandl, S., Miehtke, H., Huwe, B. and Glaser, B., 2017. Short-term effect of biochar and compost on soil fertility and water status of a Dystric Cambisol in NE Germany under field conditions. J. Plant Nut. Soil Sci., 180(3): 466–475. Philips, J. M. and Hayman, D. S., 1970. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Tr. Br. Mycol. Soc., 55: 158–161. Piper, C. S., 1966. Soil and plant analysis. Hans Publishers, Bombay. Premalatha, R. P., Poorna Bindu, J., Nivetha, E., Malarvizhi, P., Manorama, K., Parameswari, E. and Davamani, V., 2023. A review on biochar’s effect on soil properties and crop growth. Frontiers in Energy Research, 11, 1092637. Porter, W. M., 1979. The 'most probable number' method for enumerating infective propagules of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil. Soil Res., 17(3): 515–519. Priya, M., Kumutha, K. and Senthilkumar, M., 2019. Impact of bacterization of Rhizobium and Methylobacterium radiotolerans on germination and survivability in groundnut seed. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., 8: 394–405. Riaz, M., et al., 2019. Biochar enhances mycorrhizal colonization and nutrient uptake in plants. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 26(7): 6823–6834. Rillig, M. C., Wright, S. F., Nichols, K. A., Schmidt, W. F. and Torn, M. S., 2002. Large contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to soil carbon pools in tropical forest soils. Plant Soil, 233(2): 167–177. Smith, J. L., Collins, H. P. and Bailey, V. L., 2010. The effect of young biochar on soil respiration. Soil Biol. Biochem., 42(12): 2345–2347. Smith, S. E., and Read, D. J., 2008. Mycorrhizal symbiosis (3rd ed.). Academic Press, Massachusetts, USA. Solaiman, Z. M. and Blackwell, P., 2012. Mycorrhizal root colonisation and diversity in a biochar-amended soil. Soil Res., 50(8): 619–626. Stanley, N. R., Britton, R. A., Grossman, A. D. and Lazazzera, B. A., 2003. Identification of catabolite repression as a physiological regulator of biofilm formation by Bacillus subtilis by use of DNA microarrays. J. Bacteriol., 185(6): 1951–1957. Sukartono, U. W., Kusuma, Z. and Nugroho, W. H., 2011. Soil fertility status, nutrient uptake, and maize (Zea mays L.) yield following biochar and cattle manure application on sandy soils of Lombok, Indonesia. J. Trop. Agri., 49(1–2): 47–52. Toor, M. D. and Adnan, M., 2020. Role of soil microbes in agriculture: A review. Open Access J. Biol. Sci. Res., 3(5): 1–5. Warnock, D. D., Lehmann, J., Kuyper, T. W. and Rillig, M. C., 2007. Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil: Concepts and mechanisms. Plant Soil, 300(1): 9–20. Yaashikaa, P. R., Kumar, P. S., Varjani, S. and Saravanan, A. J., 2020. A critical review on the biochar production techniques, characterization, stability and applications for circular bioeconomy. Biotechnol. Rep., 28: e00570. Zhang, C., Wang, M. Y., Khan, N., Tan, L. L. and Yang, S., 2021. Potentials, utilization, and bioengineering of plant growth-promoting Methylobacterium for sustainable agriculture. Sustainability, 13(7): 3941.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
NPK bacteria, AMF and biochar combined gave the highest shoot and root lengths of tomato seedlings.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochare0
- Interactor
- AMFe0symbiont
- Second interactor
- NPK bacteriae0symbiont
- Outcome
- shoot and root lengthse1
- Direction
- higheste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The combined application of NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar significantly enhanced tomato seedling growth and soil health indicators”
e1“The highest shoot and root lengths were recorded under this treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK bacteria, AMF and biochar combined improved stem diameter and biovolume index of tomato seedlings.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochare0
- Interactor
- AMFe0symbiont
- Second interactor
- NPK bacteriae0symbiont
- Outcome
- Stem diameter, biovolume indexe1
- Direction
- improvede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The combined application of NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar significantly enhanced tomato seedling growth and soil health indicators”
e1“Stem diameter, biovolume index, fresh and dry weights also improved notably with this combination”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK bacteria, AMF and biochar combined improved fresh and dry weights of tomato seedlings.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochare0
- Interactor
- AMFe0symbiont
- Second interactor
- NPK bacteriae0symbiont
- Outcome
- fresh and dry weightse1
- Direction
- improvede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The combined application of NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar significantly enhanced tomato seedling growth and soil health indicators”
e1“Stem diameter, biovolume index, fresh and dry weights also improved notably with this combination”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest rhizosphere bacterial population was found under NPK bacteria, AMF and biochar combined.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar treatmente1
- Interactor
- NPK bacteriae1symbiont
- Second interactor
- AMFe0symbiont
- Outcome
- rhizosphere bacterial populatione1
- Direction
- higheste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The combined application of NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar significantly enhanced tomato seedling growth and soil health indicators”
e1“The highest rhizosphere bacterial population was observed in the NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal colonization peaked under NPK bacteria, AMF and biochar combined.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochare0
- Interactor
- AMFe0symbiont
- Second interactor
- NPK bacteriae0symbiont
- Outcome
- mycorrhizal colonizatione1
- Direction
- peakede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The combined application of NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar significantly enhanced tomato seedling growth and soil health indicators”
e1“Similarly, mycorrhizal colonization peaked in this treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK (%) and organic carbon (OC%) content was highest in the shoot under NPK bacteria, AMF and biochar combined.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Organ / stage
- shoote1
- Treatment
- NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochare1
- Interactor
- AMFe0symbiont
- Second interactor
- NPK bacteriae0symbiont
- Outcome
- NPK (%) and organic carbon (OC%) contente1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Comparator
- AMF + Biochar and NPK bacteria + Biochare1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The combined application of NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar significantly enhanced tomato seedling growth and soil health indicators”
e1“NPK (%) and organic carbon (OC%) content was highest in the shoot of the NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar treatment, followed by AMF + Biochar and NPK bacteria + Biochar”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK bacteria alone contributed significantly to nutrient availability and early growth of tomato seedlings.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- NPK bacteria alonee1
- Interactor
- NPK bacteriae1symbiont
- Outcome
- nutrient availability and early plant growthe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The combined application of NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar significantly enhanced tomato seedling growth and soil health indicators”
e1“NPK bacteria alone contributed significantly to nutrient availability and early plant growth”
Claim · model-written summary
The efficiency of NPK bacteria was substantially enhanced when combined with AMF and/or biochar.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- combined with AMF and/or biochare2
- Interactor
- AMFe2symbiont
- Second interactor
- NPK bacteriae1symbiont
- Outcome
- efficiencye2
- Direction
- enhancede2
- Comparator
- NPK bacteria alonee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The combined application of NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar significantly enhanced tomato seedling growth and soil health indicators”
e1“NPK bacteria alone contributed significantly to nutrient availability and early plant growth”
e2“its efficiency was substantially enhanced when combined with AMF and/or biochar”
Claim · model-written summary
Combining NPK bacteria with AMF and/or biochar improved nutrient uptake dynamics, mycorrhizal root colonization and microbial interactions in the substrate.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- combined with AMF and/or biochare2
- Interactor
- AMFe2symbiont
- Second interactor
- NPK bacteriae1symbiont
- Outcome
- nutrient uptake dynamics, Mycorrhizal root colonization, and microbial interactionse3
- Direction
- improvede3
- Comparator
- NPK bacteria alonee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The combined application of NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar significantly enhanced tomato seedling growth and soil health indicators”
e1“NPK bacteria alone contributed significantly to nutrient availability and early plant growth”
e2“its efficiency was substantially enhanced when combined with AMF and/or biochar”
e3“which improved nutrient uptake dynamics, Mycorrhizal root colonization, and microbial interactions in the substrate”
Claim · model-written summary
Enhanced soil organic matter retention under the combined treatment is suggested to be due to biochar carbon and AMF-stimulated root biomass.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Outcome
- enhanced soil organic matter retentione1
- Qualifier
- due to biochar’s inherent carbon content and AMF-stimulated root biomasse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The combined application of NPK bacteria + AMF + Biochar significantly enhanced tomato seedling growth and soil health indicators”
e1“This increase suggests enhanced soil organic matter retention due to biochar’s inherent carbon content and AMF-stimulated root biomass”
The same questions in other papers
biochar · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
76 papers more in this group
See all 80 papers →mycorrhiza · soil: chemistry · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →biochar · soil: chemistry · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →inoculation · soil: chemistry · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →biochar · soil: biology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →inoculation · soil: biology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →mycorrhiza · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →fertilization · soil: biology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →8 of 16 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.