Paper · 2025 · Microorganisms

Supplementation with Mo, Co, and Ni Enhances the Effectiveness of Co-Inoculation with the Rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens in Soybean

Mateus Neri Oliveira Reis; Luciana Cristina Vitorino; Marialva Alvarenga Moreira; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Efficient biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) is crucial for sustainable soybean productivity. Current strategies involve the use of Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens and co-inoculation with plant growth-promoting bacteria like Azospirillum brasilense. To further optimize BNF and plant performance, we investigated the effect of co-inoculation with A. brasilense and B. diazoefficiens combined with the strategic application of the micronutrients Molybdenum (Mo), Cobalt (Co), and Nickel (Ni) on soybean grown under greenhouse conditions. We evaluated plant growth, photosynthetic parameters, accumulation of N, nitrate reductase activity, and nifH gene expression at the R1 reproductive stage. Our main finding was that the co-inoculation combined with the simultaneous application of Mo, Co, and Ni significantly maximized vegetative growth, photochemical efficiency, and BNF. Specifically, this triple supplementation increased nifH gene expression (0.22) compared to the inoculated control (0.003), leading to a substantial enhancement of photosynthetic parameters, including photosystem II (PSII) efficiency and net carbon assimilation (A). For example, the total dry mass was 14.36 g in the Mo + Co + Ni + AZO + BRADY combination and 6.50 g in the non-inoculated and non-micronutrient-treated plants. The total N content was also higher in the plants treated with Mo + Co + Ni + AZO + BRADY (73.20 g kg−1). Crucially, the data also demonstrated that excessive levels of Co impaired the symbiosis, underscoring the necessity of precise dose management. These results confirm the strong synergistic potential of combining microbial co-inoculation with targeted mineral nutrition as a high-impact, sustainable strategy for boosting soybean productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined co-inoculation and Mo, Co and Ni maximized vegetative growth, photochemical efficiency and BNF.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
co-inoculation combined with the simultaneous application of Mo, Co, and Nie0
Outcome
vegetative growth, photochemical efficiency, and BNFe0
Direction
maximizede0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the co-inoculation combined with the simultaneous application of Mo, Co, and Ni significantly maximized vegetative growth, photochemical efficiency, and BNF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–873 · show in text ↑
e1

“on soybean grown under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–533 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triple supplementation raised nifH expression relative to the inoculated control.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
this triple supplementatione0
Gene
nifHe0
Outcome
nifH gene expressione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.22e0
Comparator
inoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this triple supplementation increased nifH gene expression (0.22) compared to the inoculated control (0.003)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–997 · show in text ↑
e1

“on soybean grown under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–533 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment enhanced PSII efficiency and net carbon assimilation.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe2
Treatment
co-inoculation combined with the simultaneous application of Mo, Co, and Nie1
Outcome
photosystem II (PSII) efficiency and net carbon assimilation (A)e0
Direction
enhancemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“substantial enhancement of photosynthetic parameters, including photosystem II (PSII) efficiency and net carbon assimilation (A)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1140 · show in text ↑
e1

“co-inoculation combined with the simultaneous application of Mo, Co, and Ni”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–796 · show in text ↑
e2

“on soybean grown under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–533 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment produced 14.36 g dry mass versus 6.50 g without inoculation or micronutrients.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Mo + Co + Ni + AZO + BRADY combinatione0
Outcome
total dry masse0
Value
14.36 ge0
Qualifier
6.50 ge0
Comparator
non-inoculated and non-micronutrient-treated plantse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total dry mass was 14.36 g in the Mo + Co + Ni + AZO + BRADY combination and 6.50 g in the non-inoculated and non-micronutrient-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1301 · show in text ↑
e1

“on soybean grown under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–533 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total nitrogen content was higher under the combined treatment, reaching 73.20 g kg−1.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Mo + Co + Ni + AZO + BRADYe0
Outcome
total N contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
73.20 g kg−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total N content was also higher in the plants treated with Mo + Co + Ni + AZO + BRADY (73.20 g kg−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1407 · show in text ↑
e1

“on soybean grown under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–533 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excessive Co impaired symbiosis.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
excessive levels of Coe0
Outcome
symbiosise0
Direction
impairede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“excessive levels of Co impaired the symbiosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1497 · show in text ↑
e1

“on soybean grown under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–533 · show in text ↑

nickel atom · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

11 papers: 5 positive, 6 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

molybdenum atom · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

32 papers: 22 positive, 10 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

molybdenum atom · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

nickel atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nickel atom · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nickel atom · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

cobalt atom · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

cobalt atom · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.