Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Double Nickel did not significantly reduce white mold incidence on plants compared with nontreated plots.

Taxon: Dry Black Beant0
Treatment: Double Nickele0
Interactor: Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume1pathogen
Outcome: incidence on plantse0
Direction: no_changeinferrede0
Comparator: nontreated control plotse0

Verbatim

e0
“All products significantly reduced the incidence on plants compared with nontreated control plots, except for Double Nickel”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–535

e1
“Sclerotinia sclerotiorum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46

t0
“Dry Black Bean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–68

Title

Evaluation of Fungicides for White Mold Management in Dry Black Bean in Geneva, New York, 2024

Sarah J. Pethybridge; Aastha Subedi; Sean Murphy Plant Health Progress 2026. doi:10.1094/php-02-26-0053-pdmr

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect All tested fungicides except Double Nickel significantly reduced white mold incidence on plants compared with nontreated plots.
Intervention effect White mold incidence on plants with Double Nickel was not significantly different from Howler EVO, Theia and Badge X2.
Intervention effect All treatments significantly reduced white mold incidence on pods compared with control plots.
Intervention effect White mold incidence on pods did not differ significantly between the treatments.
Intervention effect Treatment had no significant effect on pod yield components.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

White mold incidence on plants with Double Nickel was not significantly different from Howler EVO, Theia and Badge X2.

Taxon: Dry Black Beant0
Treatment: Double Nickele0
Interactor: Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume1pathogen
Outcome: incidence on plantse0
Direction: not significantly differente0
Comparator: Howler EVO, Theia, and Badge X2e0

Verbatim

e0
“The incidence on plants in plots receiving Double Nickel was not significantly different from Howler EVO, Theia, and Badge X2”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–662

e1
“Sclerotinia sclerotiorum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46

t0
“Dry Black Bean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–68

Title

Evaluation of Fungicides for White Mold Management in Dry Black Bean in Geneva, New York, 2024

Sarah J. Pethybridge; Aastha Subedi; Sean Murphy Plant Health Progress 2026. doi:10.1094/php-02-26-0053-pdmr

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect All tested fungicides except Double Nickel significantly reduced white mold incidence on plants compared with nontreated plots.
Intervention effect Double Nickel did not significantly reduce white mold incidence on plants compared with nontreated plots.
Intervention effect All treatments significantly reduced white mold incidence on pods compared with control plots.
Intervention effect White mold incidence on pods did not differ significantly between the treatments.
Intervention effect Treatment had no significant effect on pod yield components.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

White mold incidence on pods did not differ significantly between the treatments.

Taxon: Dry Black Beant0
Organ / stage: podse0
Treatment: all treatmentse0
Interactor: Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume1pathogen
Outcome: incidence of white mold on podse0
Direction: not significantly differente0
Comparator: each othere0

Verbatim

e0
“The incidence of white mold on pods was significantly reduced by all treatments compared with control plots, and they were not significantly different between each other”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–833

e1
“Sclerotinia sclerotiorum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46

t0
“Dry Black Bean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–68

Title

Evaluation of Fungicides for White Mold Management in Dry Black Bean in Geneva, New York, 2024

Sarah J. Pethybridge; Aastha Subedi; Sean Murphy Plant Health Progress 2026. doi:10.1094/php-02-26-0053-pdmr

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect All tested fungicides except Double Nickel significantly reduced white mold incidence on plants compared with nontreated plots.
Intervention effect Double Nickel did not significantly reduce white mold incidence on plants compared with nontreated plots.
Intervention effect White mold incidence on plants with Double Nickel was not significantly different from Howler EVO, Theia and Badge X2.
Intervention effect All treatments significantly reduced white mold incidence on pods compared with control plots.
Intervention effect Treatment had no significant effect on pod yield components.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment had no significant effect on pod yield components.

Taxon: Dry Black Beant0
Treatment: Treatmente0
Outcome: pod yield componentse0
Direction: no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Dry Black Bean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–68

e0
“Treatment had no significant effect on the pod yield components”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–898

Title

Evaluation of Fungicides for White Mold Management in Dry Black Bean in Geneva, New York, 2024

Sarah J. Pethybridge; Aastha Subedi; Sean Murphy Plant Health Progress 2026. doi:10.1094/php-02-26-0053-pdmr

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect All tested fungicides except Double Nickel significantly reduced white mold incidence on plants compared with nontreated plots.
Intervention effect Double Nickel did not significantly reduce white mold incidence on plants compared with nontreated plots.
Intervention effect White mold incidence on plants with Double Nickel was not significantly different from Howler EVO, Theia and Badge X2.
Intervention effect All treatments significantly reduced white mold incidence on pods compared with control plots.
Intervention effect White mold incidence on pods did not differ significantly between the treatments.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carrier volume (140 versus 280 L ha -1) did not significantly affect Palmer amaranth control.

Taxon: Palmer amaranthe0
Treatment: carrier volumee0
Outcome: Palmer amaranth controle0
Direction: did not significantly affecte0
Qualifier: 140 L ha -1 and 280 L ha -1e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“carrier volume did not significantly affect Palmer amaranth control at these volumes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1444

e1
“mixtures of 140 L ha -1 and 280 L ha -1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1330

Title

Managing Auxin-Resistant Palmer Amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri ) from West Tennessee with Sequential Applications of 2,4-D with and without Glufosinate

Colton Fuller; Thomas Mueller; Lawrence E. Steckel Weed Technology 2026. doi:10.1017/wet.2026.10115

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The dose of selenium and the timing of its application were not associated with significant changes in the content of both forms of sulphur in the tested plants.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: dose of selenium and the timing of its applicatione0
Outcome: content of both forms of sulphure0
Direction: not associated with significant changese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114

e0
“the dose of selenium and the timing of its application were not associated with significant changes in the content of both forms of sulphur in the tested plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1208

Title

Selenium (IV) and Sulphur (VI) as Elements Modifying Plant Quality: Content of Selenium and Sulphur Forms in Wheat

Marzena S. Brodowska; Magdalena Kurzyna-Szklarek; Mirosław Wyszkowski Molecules 2026. doi:10.3390/molecules31010160

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Selenium fertilisation significantly increased the selenium content in the grain of spelt wheat.
Intervention effect Selenium fertilisation significantly increased the selenium content in the grain of common wheat.
Intervention effect The concentration of selenium in wheat was also influenced by the timing of selenium application.
Intervention effect The experimental factors used did not lead to selenium levels toxic to humans and animals.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence in the growth environment increased total sulphur, sulphate sulphur and organic sulphur contents in spelt wheat grain and straw.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence in the growth environment increased total sulphur, sulphate sulphur and organic sulphur contents in common wheat grain and straw.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased total sulphur content of spelt wheat straw by an average of 17%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased sulphate sulphur content of spelt wheat straw by an average of 29%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased organic sulphur content of spelt wheat straw by an average of 23%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased total sulphur content of common wheat straw by 26%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased sulphate sulphur content of common wheat straw by 18%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased organic sulphur content of common wheat straw by 57%.
Intervention effect The sulphur content in the plant growth environment was not associated with a change in the selenium content in the grain of the tested plants.
Recommendation The authors suggest the optimal selenium dose for biofortification is 20 mg Se ha-1 on clay soil, applied during the stem elongation phase of spelt and common wheat.
Recommendation The authors conclude that biofortification of wheat with selenium and sulphur is a good method of supplementing deficiencies of this element in the human diet.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The experimental factors used did not lead to selenium levels toxic to humans and animals.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: experimental factorse0
Outcome: selenium levels toxic to humans and animalse0
Direction: did not contributee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114

e0
“The experimental factors used did not contribute to the achievement of selenium levels toxic to humans and animals”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1324

Title

Selenium (IV) and Sulphur (VI) as Elements Modifying Plant Quality: Content of Selenium and Sulphur Forms in Wheat

Marzena S. Brodowska; Magdalena Kurzyna-Szklarek; Mirosław Wyszkowski Molecules 2026. doi:10.3390/molecules31010160

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sulphur content in the plant growth environment was not associated with a change in the selenium content in the grain of the tested plants.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage: graine0
Treatment: sulphur content in the plant growth environmente0
Outcome: selenium content in the graine0
Direction: not associated with a changee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114

e0
“The sulphur content in the plant growth environment was not associated with a change in the selenium content in the grain of the tested plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1683–1825

Title

Selenium (IV) and Sulphur (VI) as Elements Modifying Plant Quality: Content of Selenium and Sulphur Forms in Wheat

Marzena S. Brodowska; Magdalena Kurzyna-Szklarek; Mirosław Wyszkowski Molecules 2026. doi:10.3390/molecules31010160

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Selenium fertilisation significantly increased the selenium content in the grain of spelt wheat.
Intervention effect Selenium fertilisation significantly increased the selenium content in the grain of common wheat.
Intervention effect The concentration of selenium in wheat was also influenced by the timing of selenium application.
Intervention effect The dose of selenium and the timing of its application were not associated with significant changes in the content of both forms of sulphur in the tested plants.
Intervention effect The experimental factors used did not lead to selenium levels toxic to humans and animals.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence in the growth environment increased total sulphur, sulphate sulphur and organic sulphur contents in spelt wheat grain and straw.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence in the growth environment increased total sulphur, sulphate sulphur and organic sulphur contents in common wheat grain and straw.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased total sulphur content of spelt wheat straw by an average of 17%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased sulphate sulphur content of spelt wheat straw by an average of 29%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased organic sulphur content of spelt wheat straw by an average of 23%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased total sulphur content of common wheat straw by 26%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased sulphate sulphur content of common wheat straw by 18%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased organic sulphur content of common wheat straw by 57%.
Recommendation The authors suggest the optimal selenium dose for biofortification is 20 mg Se ha-1 on clay soil, applied during the stem elongation phase of spelt and common wheat.
Recommendation The authors conclude that biofortification of wheat with selenium and sulphur is a good method of supplementing deficiencies of this element in the human diet.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternating Trichoderma with synthetic fungicides was statistically equivalent to Trichoderma alone in disease control.

Taxon: PotatoSolanum tuberosumt1
Treatment: alternating application of Trichoderma with synthetic fungicidese0
Interactor: Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorumt0pathogen
Second interactor: TrichodermaTrichodermae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: disease controle0
Direction: statistically equivalente0
Comparator: Trichoderma-alone treatmente0

Verbatim

e0
“The alternating application of Trichoderma with synthetic fungicides proved statistically equivalent to the Trichoderma-alone treatment in disease control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1284

t1
“Potato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–134

t0
“Sclerotinia sclerotiorum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–109

Title

In Vitro and Field Effectiveness of the Combination of Four Trichoderma spp. Against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Its Impact on Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Crop Production

Gabriel Herrera-Rodriguez; Ruben Felix-Gastelum; Maria Belen Irazoqui-Acosta; et al. Plants 2026. doi:10.3390/plants15010156

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields on the ley soil were unaffected by genotype or drought.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: genotype or droughte0
Outcome: Yieldse0
Direction: unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105

e0
“Yields on the ley soil (3.74 t ha −1 ) were 77 % −123 % higher than on ploughed and disc cultivated soils, and unaffected by genotype or drought, despite its > 70 % reduction in root biomass”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–994

Title

Regenerative agriculture effects on biomass, drought resilience and 14C-photosynthate allocation in wheat drilled into ley compared to disc or ploughed arable soil

Nichola Austen; Elizabeth Short; Stefanie Tille; et al. Soil and Tillage Research 2026. doi:10.1016/j.still.2025.107016

Other claims from this paper (13)

Observation The ley soil had lower bulk density than the ploughed and disc cultivated soils.
Observation The ley soil stored more water.
Observation The taller wheat genotype maintained an 8-fold higher proportion of water-stable macroaggregates in ley soil.
Observation The taller wheat genotype had a smaller root biomass despite its higher macroaggregate proportion.
Intervention effect Wheat yields on the ley soil (3.74 t ha−1) were 77-123% higher than on ploughed and disc cultivated soils.
Observation Root biomass on the ley soil was reduced by more than 70%.
Observation Of the 14C initially retained in wheat, 72% was in shoots.
Observation Root allocation of 14C decreased by 75-90% in droughted ley soil.
Observation At harvest the soil retained less than 1% of the 14C.
Observation Soil 14C retention was significantly lower for the taller wheat and for the ley.
Association The better macroaggregation of taller wheat in ley soil was not explained by root biomass or photosynthate allocation.
Intervention effect Taller wheat unexpectedly failed to increase soil 14C sequestration.
Intervention effect There was no evidence that ley regeneration of macroaggregation enhances soil C sequestration under wheat, despite higher yields.

All claims

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics