View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content decrease d to a basal level after drought treatments.
Treatmentdrought treatments e0 Outcomerelative water content e0 Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in relative water content to a basal level in response to drought treatments was observed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–821 t0 “SOYBEANS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–56 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d relative water content across all cultivars.
Treatmentdrought-treated e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 e0 “a decrease in relative water content (RWC) and in crease of malondialdehyde content were observed in drought-treated plants of all cultivars. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–697 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect Drought lowered CO2 assimilation and transpiration rate across all cultivars. Observation Drought caused stomata closure across all cultivars. Intervention effect Drought increased malondialdehyde content across all cultivars. Observation The drought-related changes were most pronounced in Ellvis. Observation Soissons retained higher relative water content and CO2 assimilation under drought. Intervention effect Sugars, organic acids, amino acids and sugar alcohols accumulated to higher levels with drought than in controls. Association Several metabolites accumulated differently among genotypes under drought. Intervention effect Drought induced sucrose, malic and oxalic acids in four of six genotypes. Intervention effect Drought induced unknown organic acid 1 and unknown disaccharides 1, 2 and 3 in four of six genotypes. Intervention effect Drought induced GABA, L-threonine and glutamic acid in four of six genotypes. Observation Soissons accumulated the highest amount of unknown disaccharide 5, galactonic and phosphoric acids. Intervention effect Srpanjka increased glucose and fructose under drought. Observation Srpanjka accumulated unidentified sugar alcohols 1 and 2 under drought. Intervention effect In Ellvis, drought decreased Pn, gs and RWC. Intervention effect In Ellvis, drought decreased accumulation of sucrose, glucose and fructose. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content decrease d nearly 16 percent during dehydration.
Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in relative water content of nearly 16% during dehydration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–359 t0 “Parkinsonia aculeata ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–102 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought treatments significantly decrease d soil water content , leaf water potential, and leaf relative water content .
TreatmentDrought treatments (M2 and M3) e0 Outcomesoil water content, leaf water potential, leaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Macroptilium bracteatum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–74 e0 “Drought treatments (M2 and M3) significantly (P < 0.05) decrease soil water content , leaf water potential, leaf relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–773 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
In the field, relative water content of Nicotiana glauca did not decrease with drought.
Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Directionno_change inferred e0 Verbatim
t0 “in the cosmopolitan in vader Nicotiana glauca ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–95 e0 “In the field, water potential, photosynthetic rate (A) and stomatal conductance (gs), but not relative water content (RWC) decrease d because of drought ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–722 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf water potential and relative water content fell with drought.
Treatmentdrought stress e0 Outcomeleaf water potential (Ψ) and relative water content e0 Verbatim
t0 “POMEGRANATE SEEDLINGS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 e0 “A gradual decrease in leaf water potential (Ψ) and relative water content was evident with in creasing drought stress levels. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1099 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
High salinity decrease d relative water content and water potential.
Outcomerelative water content and water potential e0 Verbatim
e0 “High salinity led also to a decrease in the relative water content and water potential ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1222 t0 “Calligonum caput-medusae ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–147 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content decrease d continuously in all lettuce head sections.
Organ / stageall sections e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was a continuous decrease in the relative water content (RWC) in all sections. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–469 t0 “butterhead ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–57 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought significantly decrease d maize relative water content .
Treatmentdrought condition e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “drought condition caused a significant decrease in biomass, total chlorophyll, relative water content (RWC) of the plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–983 t0 “Zea mays seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress significantly decrease d relative water content and chlorophyll stability in dex.
Outcomerelative water content, chlorophyll stability index e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Water stress was found to decrease significantly in the data of photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, relative water content , chlorophyll stability in dex ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–820 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.