View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Resistant and less resistant accessions belong to Cucurbita maxima , C. maxima subsp. maxima , C. maxima subsp. andreana and C. okeechobeensis subsp. martinezii .
Verbatim
e0 “Resistant and less resistant accessions belong to the species Cucurbita maxima , C . maxima subsp. maxima , C . maxima subsp. andreana , and C . okeechobeensis subsp. martinezii ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1528 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed surface ultrastructure distinguishes Spergula maxima from Spergula arvensis subsp. arvensis , supporting Spergula arvensis subsp. maxima .
OutcomeSpergula arvensis subsp. maxima e0 Verbatim
e0 “between Spergula maxima and Spergula arvensis subsp. arvensis , accordingly we propose — Spergula arvensis subsp. maxima ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1657 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
C. maxima showed high genotypic variability.
Outcomegenotypic variability e0 Verbatim
e0 “This study proved the existence of high genotypic variability in C. maxima ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1161 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
All C. maxima crude extracts contained vitamin C.
Verbatim
e0 “vitamin C in all the C. maxima crude extracts. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1195 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Powdery mildew infection was observed on Cucurbita maxima .
Outcomepowdery mildew infection e0 Verbatim
e0 “A powdery mildew infection was observed on Cucurbita maxima Duchesne. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–145 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Fertilization had a more positive effect on Glyceria maxima .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “fertilization had a more positive effect on G. maxima ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1839–1892 t0 “Carex acuta and Glyceria maxima ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–101 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The C. maxima genome contained 102 identified CmWRKY genes.
Outcome102 CmWRKY genes e0 Verbatim
e0 “102 CmWRKY genes were identified in the C. maxima genome ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–395 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Flooding stressed Glyceria maxima .
Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Both species were stressed when flooded, but C. acuta more so than G. maxima ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1895–1971 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
C. maxima oil showed antioxidant activity.
Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Oil of C. maxima showed potential antioxidant and antimicrobial activity. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1529 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
C. maxima oil showed antimicrobial activity.
Outcomeantimicrobial activity e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Oil of C. maxima showed potential antioxidant and antimicrobial activity. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1529 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.