View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought caused a decrease in relative water content .
Drought stress e0 relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Drought stress resulted in a sharp decrease of the relative water content and in crease of the membrane permeability and proline content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1095 t0 “Pear Seedling ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The maximum decrease in relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content under salinity was observed in chickpea genotype ICC15868.
relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content e0 Verbatim
e0 “Maximum decrease in relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content was observed with ICC15868 and GL26054 among the desi and L552 from the kabuli genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–765 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The maximum decrease in relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content under salinity was observed in chickpea genotype GL26054.
relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content e0 Verbatim
e0 “Maximum decrease in relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content was observed with ICC15868 and GL26054 among the desi and L552 from the kabuli genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–765 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
High salinity caused a stronger decrease in relative water content without leaching.
relative water content e0 stronger decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “HSS-HWS determined a stronger decrease in leaf water potential and relative water content under No SL than SL ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–998 t0 “Sorghum bicolor
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought-stressed alfalfa plants showed a significant decrease in relative water content of 7.45%.
drought-stressed e0 relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In drought-stressed alfalfa plants, we observed a significant decrease in the relative water content (7.45%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1057 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d relative water content .
relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The results obtained showed that the effects of water stress are manifested by a decrease in the relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–365 t0 “ALFALFA ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content decrease d with in creasing NaCl.
NaCl concentration e1 relative water content e0 Verbatim
t0 “Azolla pinnata
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–79 e0 “with a decrease in relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–697 e1 “in creasing NaCl concentration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–654 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Mineral nutrition caused a decrease in relative water content in spring wheat.
mineral nutrition e4 Verbatim
e0 “Water stress significantly made relative water content (RWC) in spring wheat leaves drop sharply ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1–97 e4 “The phenomenon of RWC decrease caused by mineral nutrition was also observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1201 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
PEG treatment reduced relative water content in rice leaves.
relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “PEG treatment resulted in a decrease in relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–178 t0 “Rice Leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–72 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing salinity significantly reduced relative water content .
Increased salinity e0 relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In creased salinity resulted in a significant decrease in shoot and root biomass, relative water content and water potential. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–519 t0 “alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–82 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Decreasing soil water potential during vegetative and flowering stages caused a higher decrease in relative water content in pigeon pea cv. ICPL-151 than in cv. H-77-216.
vegetative and flowering stages e1 Decrease in soil water potential e1 relative water content e1 higher decrease e1 Verbatim
t0 “Response of pigeon pea cultivars to water stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 e1 “Decrease in soil water potential during vegetative and flowering stages of two cultivars of pipeon pea (Cajanus cajari) caused higher decrease in relative water content in cv. ICPL-151 than in cv. H-77-216 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Under drought, in tact yam bean plants had a significant decrease in leaf- relative - water content .
intact plants (I+D) e0 leaf-relative-water content (LRWC) e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “yam bean (Pachyrhizus ahipa (Wedd.) Parodi) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–90 e0 “a significant decrease was observed in the in tact plants (I+D) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–648 e1 “leaf- relative - water content (LRWC) was maintained in the pruned plants (P+D), a significant decrease was observed in the in tact plants (I+D) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–648 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower substrate osmotic potential decrease d relative water content and leaf water potential.
Vigna catjang Endl.e0 Decreasing substrate osmotic potential e0 relative water content and leaf water potential e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Decreasing substrate osmotic potential produced in seedlings ofVigna catjang Endl. (cv. Pusa Barsati) proportional decrease in relative water content and leaf water potential ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–174 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf area and relative water content decrease d, with drastic decrease s only under very severe stress.
very severe stress treatments e0 leaf area and relative water content e0 drastic decrease was observed only in very severe stress treatments e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Mulberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49 e0 “Though leaf area and relative water content were decrease d, drastic decrease was observed only in very severe stress treatments. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–321 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Xylem water content of Pinus thunbergii began to decrease after nematode in oculation, relative to healthy trees.
nematode inoculation e1 healthy trees e3 Verbatim
e0 “Abnormal ascent of xylem-sap was in vestigated after the in oculation of Pinus thunbergii with Bursaphelenchus xylophilus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–119 e1 “When sap-flow was disturbed two weeks after nematode in oculation, the water content began to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–481 e3 “Anatomical changes in pine tissue and in crease in nematode number were delayed until the fourth week when water content s of xylem decrease d to about 30% of healthy trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1121 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 10 % decrease in relative water content accompanied a 60-min ozone exposure of 0.55 ppm.
60-min ozone exposure of 0.55 ppm e7 relative water content e7 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “characteristics of primary bean leaves were studied in relation to ozone sensitivity and in jury ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–175 e7 “A 10 % decrease in relative water content accompanying a 60-min ozone exposure of 0.55 ppm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1025 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Root cooling at +1°C in duced a decrease of about 2% in relative water content of the leaves.
relative water content of the leaves e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “a treatment which in duced a decrease of about 2% in relative water content of the leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–373 e2 “kept with the roots at +1°C in nutrient solution and with the shoots in air at 20°C for 24 h ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–283 t0 “Water Flow in Wheat Seedlings after Small Water Deficits ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf diffusion resistance in creased as relative leaf water content decrease d.
decrease in RLWC e1 Verbatim
e0 “oat plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–796 e1 “LDR in creased with a decrease in RLWC ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–974 e2 “Leaf diffusion resistance (LDR) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–701 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=60)
Pyrus communist0
Cicer arietinum
Sorghum bicolor
Medicago sativa
Azolla pinnata
Triticum aestivum
Oryza sativa
Cajanus cajan
Pinus thunbergii
Bursaphelenchus xylophilus
Avena sativa