View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Net photosynthesis showed no obvious decrease as temperature rose.
temperature rising e0 net photosynthesis e0 no obvious decrease e0 Verbatim
t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–92 e0 “no obvious decrease pattern in net photosynthesis appeared along with the temperature rising ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–499 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Other native species had no significant decrease in net photosynthesis under water deficit.
caatinga native species t0 net photosynthesis e0 did not suffer significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “caatinga native species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–40 e0 “The other species can be considered more tolerant to drought, since net photosynthesis did not suffer significant decrease despite the harmful effects of water deficit on transpiration and stomatal conductance. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1056 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
No lower limit for photosynthesis is evident in the absorption spectra; some experiments down to 300 nm showed no decrease in absorption.
lower limit for photosynthesis e5 Verbatim
e1 “The spectrum of a Fuchsia leaf ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–765 e5 “No evidence, however, is to be seen of a lower limit for photosynthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1513 e6 “some experiments down to 300 nm still did not show a decrease of the absorption ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1607 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
At lower light, root cooling did not decrease whole-plant photosynthesis .
A of the whole plant e0 did not cause a decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “At lower PPFD, root cooling did not cause a decrease in A of the whole plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1294 t0 “Artemisia tridentata
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Infection did not decrease photosynthesis in any fifth leaves versus controls.
fifth leaves e0 Erysiphe graminis D.c. ex Merat f. sp. avenae MarchalBlumeria avenae t0 pathogen rate of photosynthesis e1 Verbatim
e0 “no decrease in any of the fifth leaves relative to controls ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–493 e1 “rate of photosynthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–383 t0 “oats exhibiting different levels of partial resistance to Erysiphe graminis D.c. ex Merat f. sp. avenae Marchal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–145 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Infection generally did not decrease photosynthesis , except in second leaves of one genotype.
second leaves e0 Erysiphe graminis D.c. ex Merat f. sp. avenae MarchalBlumeria avenae t0 pathogen rate of photosynthesis e0 Verbatim
e0 “The re was no decrease in the rate of photosynthesis , except in the second leaves of one genotype ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–428 t0 “oats exhibiting different levels of partial resistance to Erysiphe graminis D.c. ex Merat f. sp. avenae Marchal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–145 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
IRGA did not significantly decrease net photosynthesis at the tested moisture range.
net photosynthesis e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “did not cause a significant decrease in net photosynthesis within this range ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1478 e1 “The drying effect of the IRGA process ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1136 e2 “Colonies of Bazzania trilobata (L.) S. Gray ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in photosynthesis did not have a corresponding decrease in transpiration rate.
Sangiovese Grapevine t0 transpiration rate e0 Verbatim
t0 “Sangiovese Grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–112 e0 “A corresponding reduction in the transpiration rate was not observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–747 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Under saturating CO2, pod removal did not decrease photosynthesis measured by O2 evolution.
photosynthetic rate e0 conditions of saturating CO2 e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “such a decrease in the photosynthetic rate was not observed when measured with O2 evolution under conditions of saturating CO2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–664 t0 “pod-removed bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Additional UV irradiation did not decrease the rate of photosynthesis relative to the control variant.
additional UV irradiation e0 rate of photosynthesis e7 did not decrease e7 control variant e1 Verbatim
t0 “Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–147 e0 “the effect of additional UV irradiation of various ranges in addition to the main one ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–244 e1 “compared with the control variant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–482 e7 “while the rate of photosynthesis did not decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–646 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Photosynthesis of grapevine did not decrease much under drought.
did not decrease very much e2 Verbatim
e1 “In both grapevine varieties, early drought decrease d leaf conductance and transpiration under both CATA and CETE conditions and more markedly in +M plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1430 e2 “Photosynthesis did not decrease very much, so the instantaneous water use efficiency (WUE) increased, especially in drought +M plants under CETE conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1587 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Without drought, early-successional species did not show the decrease in net photosynthesis at the warmest site.
not in ES species e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “An under non-drought conditions decrease d in trees grown at the warmest, low-elevation site, in LS but not in ES species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1596 t0 “Tropical Trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–78 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Photosynthesis did not decrease through 87 moles per cubic meter NaCl under optimal assay conditions.
NaCl concentrations up to 87 moles per cubic meter e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “leaves of cowpea (Vigna unquiculata [L.] Walp.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 21–68 e1 “No decrease in photosynthesis was obtained for NaCl concentrations up to 87 moles per cubic meter in the plant growing media ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–624 Other claims from this paper (10) Mechanism observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in photosynthesis with age was not due to mutual shading.
not due to mutual shading e6 Verbatim
e6 “this decrease was not due to mutual shading ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–794 t0 “Plantago lanceolata
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–40 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Photoinhibitory treatment beyond 2 h did not further decrease photosynthesis in soybean.
photoinhibitory treatment for periods in excess of 2 h e2 did not cause a further decrease e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e2 “Exposure to the photoinhibitory treatment for periods in excess of 2 h did not cause a further decrease of photosynthesis in soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–823 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Glands did not reduce herbicide inhibition of cotton photosynthesis .
lysigeneous glands e0 inhibition of photosynthesis e0 Verbatim
e0 “The presence of lysigeneous glands did not increase atrazine tolerance by cotton or decrease the inhibition of photosynthesis by the herbicide. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–414 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Whole plant and single leaf shading produced the same photosynthetic decline.
whole plant was shaded e1 decrease in photosynthesis e1 only the leaf whose photosynthesis was measured e1 Verbatim
e0 “grass leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–56 e1 “The decrease in photosynthesis was unaffected by whether the whole plant was shaded or only the leaf whose photosynthesis was measured. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–388 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Antimycin A did not decrease the Michaelis constant of ribulose 1,5-diphosphate carboxylase for bicarbonate.
ribulose 1,5-diphosphate carboxylase e0 theMichaelis constant ofthechloroplast butnotofribulose 1,5-diphosphate carboxylase e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease d the Michaelis constant of thechloroplast butnotofribulose 1,5-diphosphate carboxylase forbicarbonate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–547 t0 “Antimycin A on Photosynthesis of Intact Spinach ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–55 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Four ryanodine applications at 10-day intervals caused no further decrease in apple leaf photosynthesis than a single application.
Four applications of ryanodine at 10-day intervals e1 no further decrease e1 a single application e1 Verbatim
e1 “Four applications of ryanodine at 10-day intervals caused no further decrease in photosynthesis than was obtained by a single application ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–511 t0 “EFFECTS OF RYANIA AND RYANODINE ON THE APPARENT PHOTOSYNTHESIS OF McINTOSH APPLE LEAVES ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The area of leaves receiving sub-saturation light did not decrease above 30 or 40 Klx.
area of leaves that receive light intensity below the saturation point e0 does not decrease e0 higher than 30 or 40 Klx e0 Verbatim
e0 “Even though horizontal light inetnsity gets higher than 30 or 40 Klx, the area of leaves that receive light intensity below the saturation point, does not decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1414 t0 “Sugar Beet Plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–45 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
In Funaria the seta weight did not show the same decrease as capsule weight increased.
weight of the seta e5 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Sporophytes of Polytrichum and Funaria ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–56 e5 “In Polytrichum the weight of the seta decrease s as the weight of the capsule increases ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–613 e6 “This is not the case in Funaria ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–646 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Calcium deficiency had no such effect on photosynthesis per unit leaf area.
Calcium deficiency e7 photosynthesis per unit leaf area e7 no_change inferred e7 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Chrysanthemum coronarium var. spatiosum
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–131 e7 “Calcium deficiency seems to give no such effect on photosynthesis per unit leaf area, but brings about a considerable decrease of photosynthesis per unit dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–940 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Oryza sativat0
Fuchsia
Artemisia tridentata
Avena sativa
Bazzania trilobata
Stevia rebaudiana
Vitis
Vigna unguiculata
Plantago lanceolata
Glycine max
Gossypium hirsutum
Spinacia oleracea
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Glebionis coronaria