Search claims · PlantClaims

2010s 26

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average compression force ranged from 131 to 171 N for dehulled rice.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Material: dehulled ricee0
Outcome: average compression forcee0
Value: 131 to 171 Ne0

Verbatim

e0
“The average compression force varied from 131 to 171 N for dehulled rice and 203 to 283 N for rough rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–642

Title

Mechanical properties of rough and dehulled rice during drying

Osvaldo Resende; Paulo César Corrêa; Gabriel Oliveira; et al. International Journal of Food Studies 2013. doi:10.7455/ijfs/2.2.2013.a3

Other claims from this paper (6)

Association Dehulled rice rupture force rose from 37.2 to 70.6 N as moisture declined.
Association Rough rice rupture force rose from 48.0 to 79.5 N as moisture declined.
Observation Average compression force ranged from 203 to 283 N for rough rice.
Observation Dehulled rice proportional deformity modulus ranged from 5.5 x 109 to 7.4 x 109 Pa.
Observation Rough rice proportional deformity modulus ranged from 9.5 x 109 to 12.3 x 109 Pa.
Observation Rough rice resisted compression more than dehulled rice.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average compression force ranged from 203 to 283 N for rough rice.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Material: rough ricee0
Outcome: average compression forcee0
Value: 203 to 283 Ne0

Verbatim

e0
“The average compression force varied from 131 to 171 N for dehulled rice and 203 to 283 N for rough rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–642

Title

Mechanical properties of rough and dehulled rice during drying

Osvaldo Resende; Paulo César Corrêa; Gabriel Oliveira; et al. International Journal of Food Studies 2013. doi:10.7455/ijfs/2.2.2013.a3

Other claims from this paper (6)

Association Dehulled rice rupture force rose from 37.2 to 70.6 N as moisture declined.
Association Rough rice rupture force rose from 48.0 to 79.5 N as moisture declined.
Observation Average compression force ranged from 131 to 171 N for dehulled rice.
Observation Dehulled rice proportional deformity modulus ranged from 5.5 x 109 to 7.4 x 109 Pa.
Observation Rough rice proportional deformity modulus ranged from 9.5 x 109 to 12.3 x 109 Pa.
Observation Rough rice resisted compression more than dehulled rice.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JEJEJ average compression force was 3.37 kN.

Taxon: pumpkint0
Material: JEJEJe0
Outcome: average compression forcee0
Value: 3.37e0

Verbatim

e0
“the maximum, minimum, and average compression force of JEJEJ, TC2A, Hokutokou was 4.66, 4.58, and 4.61 kN; 2.81, 2.06, and 2.24 kN; and 3.37, 3.1, and 3.23kN, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1386

t0
“pumpkin”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–27

Title

Characterization of pumpkin for a harvesting robot

Ali Roshanianfard; Noboru Noguchi IFAC-PapersOnLine 2018. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.056

Other claims from this paper (18)

Observation Average pumpkin lift weight was 26% more than pure weight.
Observation Lifted pumpkins had orientations from -90° to +90°.
Observation Average tested pumpkin radius was 105.62 mm.
Observation Average tested pumpkin volume was 4.95 × 106 mm3.
Observation Average tested pumpkin weight was 3.03 kg.
Method / resource Lifting technique and pumpkin parametrization formed a robotic harvesting method.
Observation JEJEJ maximum compression force was 4.66 kN.
Observation TC2A maximum compression force was 4.58 kN.
Observation Hokutokou maximum compression force was 4.61 kN.
Observation JEJEJ minimum compression force was 2.81 kN.
Observation TC2A minimum compression force was 2.06 kN.
Observation Hokutokou minimum compression force was 2.24 kN.
Observation TC2A average compression force was 3.1 kN.
Observation Hokutokou average compression force was 3.23 kN.
Observation JEJEJE optimum stem-cutting stress was 2.84 N ⁄ mm2.
Observation TC2A optimum stem-cutting stress was 3.3 N ⁄ mm2.
Observation Hokutokou optimum stem-cutting stress was 2.01 N ⁄ mm2.
Observation Stem-cutting times were 2.4, 2.03, and 1.39 s for JEJEJE, TC2A, and Hokutokou, respectively.

2020s 10

Show all 10 →

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet lime compression force averaged 311.08.

Taxon: sweet limeCitrus ×limettioidest0
Organ / stage: fruitt0
Outcome: compressione0
Value: 311.08e0

Verbatim

t0
“sweet lime (Citrus limetta) fruit”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–123

e0
“The average peak values of penetration, compression, and cutting forces were 9.44, 311.08, and 148.68 N, respectively.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1113

Title

Assessment of engineering parameters and mass modeling for reducing postharvest losses of sweet lime (Citrus limetta) fruit

Shivani Desai; Vikram Kad; Ganesh Shelke; et al. Italian Journal of Food Science 2025. doi:10.15586/ijfs.v37i1.2655

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Sweet lime fruit major axis averaged 78.71.
Observation Sweet lime fruit intermediate axis averaged 77.07.
Observation Sweet lime fruit transverse axis averaged 74.96.
Observation Sweet lime fruit arithmetic averaged 76.92.
Observation Sweet lime fruit geometric averaged 76.89.
Observation Sweet lime fruit equivalent mean diameters averaged 76.9 mm.
Observation Sweet lime PLA averaged 4663.01.
Observation Sweet lime PIA averaged 4567.45.
Observation Sweet lime PTA averaged 4444.17.
Observation Sweet lime CPA averaged 4558.21.
Observation Sweet lime Sa averaged 18694.41 mm2.
Observation Sweet lime volume by Vellip averaged 242.95.
Observation Sweet lime volume by Vpro averaged 254.97.
Observation Sweet lime volume by Vosp averaged 249.79 cm3.
Observation Sweet lime fruit sphericity was 0.95.
Observation Sweet lime bulk density averaged 449.75 kg/m3.
Observation Sweet lime true density averaged 931.41 kg/m3.
Observation Stainless steel had the minimum static friction against sweet lime.
Observation Sweet lime penetration force averaged 9.44.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The compression rupture force of tiger nut increased linearly from 175.56-208.77 N as moisture content rose from 8 to 40%.

Taxon: tiger nute1
Treatment: moisture contente4
Outcome: compression rupture forcee4
Direction: increasede4
Value: 175.56-208.77 Ne4
Qualifier: linearlye4

Verbatim

e1
“Chinese tiger nut varieties”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–127

e4
“The compression rupture force increased linearly from the average of 175.56-208.77 N as moisture content increased from 8 to 40%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–851

Title

The Effects of Moisture Content and Loading Orientation on Some Physical and Mechanical Properties of Tiger Nut

Long Wang; Can Hu; Wensong Guo; et al. American journal of biochemistry & biotechnology/American journal of biochemistry and biotechnology 2021. doi:10.3844/ajbbsp.2021.109.117

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato root bulbs averaged 6.05 ± 1.53 N compression force.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
Outcome: compression forcese0
Value: 6.05 ± 1.53e0

Verbatim

e0
“The average compression forces of the root bulbs were 6.05 ± 1.53, 5.8 ± 0.56, and 10.26 ± 0.16 N”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1384

e1
“Basic engineering properties of 30-day old seedlings of tomato, brinjal, and cabbage relevant to design of vegetable transplanter were evaluated.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–619

Title

Engineering Properties of Some Plug-type Vegetable Seedlings for Development of Automatic Vegetable Transplanter

Ajit Pralhad Magar; Sachin Madhukar Nalawade; Avdhoot Ashok Walunj; et al. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India) 2023. doi:10.52151/jae2023601.1792

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Tomato seedlings had 84.3 (± 3.6)% moisture content.
Observation Brinjal seedlings had 86.7 (± 4.5)% moisture content.
Observation Cabbage seedlings had 84.57 (± 3.7)% moisture content.
Observation Tomato seedling height averaged 162.44 (± 19.80) mm.
Observation Brinjal seedling height averaged 129.4 (± 16.96) mm.
Observation Cabbage seedling height averaged 114.13 (± 19.98) mm.
Observation Tomato seedling canopy length averaged 110 ± 15.62 mm.
Observation Brinjal seedling canopy length averaged 79.3 ± 16.08 mm.
Observation Cabbage seedling canopy length averaged 91.93 ± 14.44 mm.
Observation Tomato seedlings had a mild-steel friction coefficient of 0.81 (± 0.08).
Observation Brinjal seedlings had a mild-steel friction coefficient of 0.81 (± 0.07).
Observation Cabbage seedlings had a mild-steel friction coefficient of 0.89 (± 0.04).
Observation Tomato seedlings had a pro-tray adhesion force of 1.43 (± 0.40) N.
Observation Brinjal seedlings had a pro-tray adhesion force of 0.95 (± 0.22) N.
Observation Cabbage seedlings had a pro-tray adhesion force of 0.41 (± 0.04) N.
Observation Brinjal root bulbs averaged 5.8 ± 0.56 N compression force.
Observation Cabbage root bulbs averaged 10.26 ± 0.16 N compression force.
Observation Tomato root bulbs averaged 5.18 (± 0.86) N needle penetration force.
Observation Brinjal and cabbage root bulb needle penetration forces averaged 7.83 (± 0.56) and 19.47 (± 0.59) N, respectively.

2000s 8

Show all 8 →

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linear regression predicted peach compression force with R² 0.87 and 9.66% average error.

Taxon: PeachPrunus persicat0
Outcome: compression forcee0
Value: 9.66%e0

Verbatim

e0
“R 2 = 0.87 for compression force; R 2 = 0.79 for sugar content; R 2 = 0.81 for pH) and relatively low average percentage errors (9.66%, 7.68% and 3.6%, for compression force, sugar content and pH, respectively)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–479

t0
“Peach”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19

Title

Evaluation of Peach Quality Attribute Using an Electronic Nose

Hongmei Zhang; Jun Wang; J Brezmes; et al. Sensors and Materials 2009. doi:10.18494/sam.2009.585

Other claims from this paper (5)

Method / resource Linear regression predicted peach sugar content with R² 0.79 and 7.68% average error.
Method / resource Linear regression predicted peach pH with R² 0.81 and 3.6% average error.
Method / resource Neural network predicted peach compression force with R² 0.90 and 6.39% average error.
Method / resource Neural network predicted peach sugar content with R² 0.81 and 6.21% average error.
Method / resource Neural network predicted peach pH with R² 0.87 and 3.13% average error.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neural network predicted peach compression force with R² 0.90 and 6.39% average error.

Taxon: PeachPrunus persicat0
Outcome: compression forcee0
Value: 6.39%e0

Verbatim

e0
“R 2 = 0.90, 0.81 and 0.87 for compression force, sugar content and pH, respectively) between predicted and measured values and relatively low average percentage errors (6.39%, 6.21% and 3.13% for compression force, sugar content and pH, respectively)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–833

t0
“Peach”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19

Title

Evaluation of Peach Quality Attribute Using an Electronic Nose

Hongmei Zhang; Jun Wang; J Brezmes; et al. Sensors and Materials 2009. doi:10.18494/sam.2009.585

Other claims from this paper (5)

Method / resource Linear regression predicted peach compression force with R² 0.87 and 9.66% average error.
Method / resource Linear regression predicted peach sugar content with R² 0.79 and 7.68% average error.
Method / resource Linear regression predicted peach pH with R² 0.81 and 3.6% average error.
Method / resource Neural network predicted peach sugar content with R² 0.81 and 6.21% average error.
Method / resource Neural network predicted peach pH with R² 0.87 and 3.13% average error.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Debranning decreased the force at the end of compression by 230%.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: Debranninge3
Outcome: force at the end of compressione3
Direction: decreasee3
Value: 230%e3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the mechanical properties of wheat kernels”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–113

e3
“Debranning also caused a decrease of rapture force and force at the end of compression (average of about 43 and 230%, respectively)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–672

Title

MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF SINGLE KERNEL OF WHEAT IN RELATION TO DEBRANNING RATIO AND MOISTURE CONTENT

Dariusz Dziki 2004

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Debranning decreased kernel deformation up to the rupture point.
Intervention effect Increasing kernel moisture content from 12 to 16% increased kernel deformation.
Intervention effect Debranning decreased rupture force by about 43%.
Intervention effect Kernel moisture content had no significant influence on rupture force or end-of-compression force.
Intervention effect Only for undebranned kernels, increasing moisture from 12 to 14% decreased rupture force.
Association Kernel loading force at the end of compression was described by a linear regression on kernel ash content and individual kernel mass (R 2 = 0.914).

“average compression force”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

2010s 26

2020s 10

2000s 8