View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Male foliage biomass exceeded female foliage biomass without a significant difference.
biomass value of the male foliage e0 Verbatim
e0 “The mean biomass value of the male foliage is greater than that of the females,though this difference is not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1551 t0 “Rhamnus davurica
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 Other claims from this paper (19) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage biomass scaled with crown woody biomass at exponent 0·78.
Not reported Taxon Direction
Verbatim
e0 “foliage biomass scaled with crown woody biomass with an exponent of 0·78 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1050 t0 “trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Female shrub foliage biomass was 1.1 times male biomass .
Verbatim
e0 “their average foliage biomass is 1.1 times greater than that of the males ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2199–2272 t0 “Rhamnus davurica
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 Other claims from this paper (19) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Hornbeam had the largest foliage biomass .
Verbatim
e0 “hornbeam had the largest foliage biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–951 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
Larix accumulated more foliage biomass regardless of conditions.
regardless of conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “regardless of conditions, Larix accumulated more foliage biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–844 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Pine foliage biomass was reduced in dry conditions.
Verbatim
e0 “Pine had reduced foliage biomass in dry conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–687 e1 “subgenus Pinus spp. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–479 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Under thinning, branch number and foliage per branch contributed nearly equally to foliage biomass in crease.
Verbatim
t0 “lodgepole pine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 e0 “these mechanisms were almost equally important to the in crease in foliage biomass due to thinning ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2281–2378 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry matter was 35% of fresh foliage biomass .
fresh foliage biomass e0 fresh foliage biomass e0 Verbatim
e0 “it was 35% of the fresh foliage biomass and 60% of the fresh woody biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2675–2749 t0 “Black wattle (Acacia mearnsii ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 Other claims from this paper (18) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
With fertilizer, more foliated branches contributed more than foliage per branch to the foliage biomass in crease.
more important e0 Verbatim
t0 “lodgepole pine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 e0 “In creases in the number of foliated branches was more important than in creases in the amount of foliage on a branch when fertilizer was applied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2133–2276 e1 “in creased tree-level foliage biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1522 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
About 50% of biomass was lost over winter, mainly foliage .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “About 50% of the biomass was lost during the winter, mainly in foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–850 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilizer prolonged the in crease in foliage biomass .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “there was evidence of a prolonged in crease in foliage biomass due to N fertilizer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–694 t0 “Corsican pine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–108 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Water deficits decrease foliage area biomass and productivity.
Water deficits e0 foliage area biomass and, therefore, in productivity e0 Verbatim
e0 “Water deficits result in a decrease in foliage area biomass and, therefore, in productivity. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1755–1847 t0 “water-stressed plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–354 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage biomass ranged from 4.9 to 11.3 tonnes/ha over the observed stand densities.
Total foliage biomass e0 4.9 to 11.3 tonnes/ha e0 Verbatim
e0 “Total foliage biomass ranged from 4.9 to 11.3 tonnes/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1318 t0 “RADIATA PINE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–90 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage biomass regressions compared unfavorably with regressions in other studies.
Regression equations for estimating foliage biomass e0 did not compare favorably e0 foliage biomass allometric relations from other studies e0 Verbatim
e0 “Regression equations for estimating foliage biomass reported in this study did not compare favorably with foliage biomass allometric relations from other studies. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–514 e1 “western larch (Larixoccidentalis Nutt.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–193 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In secticide treatment in creased shrub foliage biomass across canopy and management settings.
treatment with insecticides e0 regardless of the shrub management practice e0 habitats with and without shrub canopy e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In habitats with and without shrub canopy, treatment with in secticides generally in creased foliage biomass and consistently decreased root biomass , regardless of the shrub management practice. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–472 t0 “mountain shrub ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–107 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The study provides equations to convert foliage biomass to surface area for most encountered species.
forest communities t0 converting from foliage biomass to surface area e0 most species encountered e0 foliage biomass e0 Verbatim
e0 “Equations for converting from foliage biomass to surface area are in cluded for most species encountered ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–449 t0 “forest communities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Green weight of total tree biomass without foliage rose from 336 pounds in 6- in ch trees to 14,336 pounds in 28- in ch trees.
green weight of total t ree biomass without foliage e0 3 36 pounds for 6-inch t rees to 14,336 pounds for 28-inch trees e0 Verbatim
e0 “Average green weight of total t ree biomass without foliage ranged from 3 36 pounds for 6- in ch t rees to 14,336 pounds for 28- in ch trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–331 e1 “yellowpoplar (Liriodendron tulipifera L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–85 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Relatively reliable estimates of foliage and seed biomass in In dian ricegrass were made from plant height, leaf length, seed stalk height, clump diameter and culm number.
foliage biomass and seed biomass e4 Relatively reliable e4 average and/or maximum plant height e4 Verbatim
e0 “Growth in In dian ricegrass commenced in the spring when soil temperatures stayed at 4 degrees C for at least 3 or 4 days ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–120 e4 “Relatively reliable estimates of foliage biomass and seed biomass were made from measurements of average and/or maximum plant height, average length of longest leaf on each culm, maximum seed stalk height, clump diameter, and number of culms per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–793 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage from control plots had higher nitrogen concentrations than foliage from burned plots.
nitrogen concentrations in the foliage e1 attributed to slower growth and less biomass production e1 control plots e1 Verbatim
e0 “Changes in mineral composition were observed for current growth and standing crop of prairie bluestem, Andropogon spp. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–118 e1 “Higher nitrogen concentrations in the foliage collected from control plots than from burned plots are attributed to slower growth and less biomass production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1543 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Regenerated shoots had eight times the specific activity of unclipped shoots.
Native Grassland Vegetation t0 Regenerated shoots e0 specific activity e0 0.134 vs. 0.017 μCi/g of carbon in foliage biomass e0 unclipped shoots e0 Verbatim
e0 “Regenerated shoots, which had been clipped 6 weeks earlier, possessed 8 times higher specific activity than unclipped shoots (0.134 vs. 0.017 μCi/g of carbon in foliage biomass ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–488 t0 “Native Grassland Vegetation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–35 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Unburned prairie produced 4.351 X 10 6 cal/m 2 of net productivity in 1962, representing 992 g biomass .
total net productivity e0 4.351 X 10 6 cal/m 2 e0 Verbatim
e0 “The energy equivalent of total net productivity in cluding foliage and roots on unburned prairie in 1962 was 4.351 X 10 6 cal/m 2 , representing 992 g of biomass . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–161 Other claims from this paper (13) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Rhamnus davuricat0
Larix
Pinus
Pinus contorta
Acacia mearnsii
Pinus nigra subsp. laricio
Larix occidentalis