View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Organism groups follow NCBI Taxonomy: the spellings of one organism are merged, a claim naming several organisms sits in each group, and claims whose value names no organism are under “not stated”.
Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Resistant chili genotypes had the least percentage decrease in dry root and dry shoot weight compared with uninoculated plants.
Materialresistant genotypes e5 Outcomedry root weight and dry shoot weight e5 Directionleast percentage decrease e5 Comparatoruninoculated plants e5 Verbatim
e0 “Chili (Capsicum annuum L.) is a vital crop in global agriculture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–64 e5 “The resistant genotypes exhibited the least percentage decrease in fresh root weight , fresh shoot weight , dry root weight and dry shoot weight compared to uninoculated plants, whereas the susceptible genotypes showed the greatest reductions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1519 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress decrease d leaf fresh and dry weight .
Outcomedry and fresh leaf weights e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Capsicum annuum L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 e0 “The exposure to salt stress resulted in a notable decrease of dry and fresh leaf weight s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–383 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced root and shoot length and dry weight relative to controls.
TreatmentDrought stress e0 Outcomeroot & shoot length and dry weight parameters e0 Comparatorcontrol plants e0 Verbatim
e0 “Drought stress resulted in a decrease in root & shoot length and dry weight parameters compared to control plants. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–620 t0 “Chili (Capsicum annuum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–55 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
ABA reduced fresh and dry weight of sorghum embryos.
Outcomefresh weight and dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a remarkable decrease in fresh weight and dry weight was observed in embryos under ABA and NaCl treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–674 t0 “Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–133 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
NaCl reduced fresh and dry weight of sorghum embryos.
Outcomefresh weight and dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a remarkable decrease in fresh weight and dry weight was observed in embryos under ABA and NaCl treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–674 t0 “Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–133 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Fresh and dry weight of embryos decrease d under ABA and NaCl treatments.
Outcomefresh weight and dry weight e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench seeds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–166 e1 “a remarkable decrease in fresh weight and dry weight was observed in embryos under ABA and NaCl treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–674 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced soil water decrease d plant height and fresh and dry shoot and root weight s.
Treatmentdecrease in soil water content e0 Outcomeplant height, fresh and dry weight of shoots and roots e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “With the decrease in soil water content, plant height, fresh and dry weight of shoots and roots, relative water content, chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll decrease , and in contrast to root length, chlorophyll b, carotenoid, proline, soluble sugar, total protein, phenol and Total flavonoid, antioxidant enzymes, inhibition of DPPH radical activity and iron reducing power (FRAP) increased. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2004–2395 t0 “Field Sowthistle (Sonchus arvensis L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–160 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced soil water decrease d leaf relative water content.
Treatmentdecrease in soil water content e0 Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “With the decrease in soil water content, plant height, fresh and dry weight of shoots and roots, relative water content, chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll decrease , and in contrast to root length, chlorophyll b, carotenoid, proline, soluble sugar, total protein, phenol and Total flavonoid, antioxidant enzymes, inhibition of DPPH radical activity and iron reducing power (FRAP) increased. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2004–2395 t0 “Field Sowthistle (Sonchus arvensis L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–160 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced soil water decrease d chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll.
Treatmentdecrease in soil water content e0 Outcomechlorophyll a and total chlorophyll e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “With the decrease in soil water content, plant height, fresh and dry weight of shoots and roots, relative water content, chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll decrease , and in contrast to root length, chlorophyll b, carotenoid, proline, soluble sugar, total protein, phenol and Total flavonoid, antioxidant enzymes, inhibition of DPPH radical activity and iron reducing power (FRAP) increased. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2004–2395 t0 “Field Sowthistle (Sonchus arvensis L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–160 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
SRS stress decrease d harvest root dry weight by 11.43 % compared with LES stress.
Verbatim
e0 “SRS stress exhibiting a decrease of 11.43 % compared to LES stress at harvest ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1005 t0 “Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–167 e1 “Compared with that in CK, the root dry weight significantly decrease d ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–861 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf-extension drought reduced root dry weight by 48.87 % relative to CK.
Verbatim
e0 “Compared with that in CK, the root dry weight significantly decrease d by 48.87 % and 21.22 % during the LES and SRS, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–921 t0 “Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–167 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed-ripening drought reduced root dry weight by 21.22 % relative to CK.
Verbatim
e0 “Compared with that in CK, the root dry weight significantly decrease d by 48.87 % and 21.22 % during the LES and SRS, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–921 t0 “Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–167 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Zinc treatments reduced fenugreek shoot dry weight by 56% to 75% versus control.
Treatmenthigh zinc supply e2 Outcomeshoot dry weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “Results showed a decrease of 56% to 75% in shoot dry weight and a decrease of 65% to 90% in roots dry weight , relatively to the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–530 t0 “Trigonella foenum-graecum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–61 e1 “investigated in fenugreek ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–248 e2 “high zinc supply ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–179 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Zinc treatments reduced fenugreek root dry weight by 65% to 90% versus control.
Treatmenthigh zinc supply e2 Outcomeroots dry weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “Results showed a decrease of 56% to 75% in shoot dry weight and a decrease of 65% to 90% in roots dry weight , relatively to the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–530 t0 “Trigonella foenum-graecum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–61 e1 “investigated in fenugreek ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–248 e2 “high zinc supply ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–179 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity reduced fenugreek root traits.
Treatmentsalinity stress e0 Outcomeroot length, root fresh weight, and root dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “salinity stress caused a decrease in morphological traits (shoot length, number of branches/ plant, number of leaves/ plant, shoot fresh weight , shoot dry weight , root length, root fresh weight , and root dry weight ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–868 t0 “Fenugreek Plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–49 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Plant dry weight fell by 36.6% with lower survival.
Outcomedry weight of the plant e0 Verbatim
e0 “the dry weight of the plant decrease d by 13.5%, 22.7%, 36.6%, and 2.03 times, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2934–3024 e1 “With a decrease in the survival percentage from 100-81% to 80-61%, 60-41%, and 20-0%, the dry weight of the plant decrease d by 13.5%, 22.7%, 36.6%, and 2.03 times, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2848–3024 t0 “Lentil Genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–30 Other claims from this paper (19) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Plant dry weight fell by 22.7% with lower survival.
Outcomedry weight of the plant e0 Verbatim
e0 “the dry weight of the plant decrease d by 13.5%, 22.7%, 36.6%, and 2.03 times, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2934–3024 e1 “With a decrease in the survival percentage from 100-81% to 80-61%, 60-41%, and 20-0%, the dry weight of the plant decrease d by 13.5%, 22.7%, 36.6%, and 2.03 times, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2848–3024 t0 “Lentil Genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–30 Other claims from this paper (19) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Plant dry weight fell by 13.5% as survival declined from the highest to the next survival range.
Outcomedry weight of the plant e0 Qualifier100-81% to 80-61% e0 Verbatim
e0 “With a decrease in the survival percentage from 100-81% to 80-61%, 60-41%, and 20-0%, the dry weight of the plant decrease d by 13.5%, 22.7%, 36.6%, and 2.03 times, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2848–3024 t0 “Lentil Genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–30 Other claims from this paper (19) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Ethylene-insensitive petunias had reduced seed weight .
Materialethylene-insensitive plants e0 Verbatim
e0 “ethylene-insensitive plants had a decrease in pollen viability, root dry mass, seed weight , and seed germination ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–802 t0 “Petunias ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Ethylene-insensitive petunias had reduced root dry mass.
Materialethylene-insensitive plants e0 Verbatim
e0 “ethylene-insensitive plants had a decrease in pollen viability, root dry mass, seed weight , and seed germination ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–802 t0 “Petunias ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Ethylene-insensitive petunias had decrease d seed weight .
Materialethylene-insensitive plants e0 Verbatim
e0 “Results indicated that ethylene-insensitive plants had a decrease in pollen viability, root dry mass, seed weight , and seed germination ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–802 t0 “petunias ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 69–77 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At flowering, water stress decrease d the turgid to dry weight ratio.
Outcometurgid weight/dry weight ratio (TW/DW) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease in turgid weight / dry weight ratio (TW/DW) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–777 t0 “Triticum durum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 e1 “Plant response to water stress differed at the two stages ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–260 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect At booting, water stress increased cell wall elasticity. Intervention effect At flowering, water stress decreased osmotic potential. Intervention effect At flowering, water stress led to accumulation of fibrous constituents and hemicellulose in cell walls. Intervention effect At flowering, water stress reduced ADF per unit leaf area. Intervention effect At flowering, water stress increased specific leaf weight. Intervention effect At flowering, water stress altered mesophyll cell morphology. Observation Valforte had the greatest mesophyll cell area and perimeter. Association At booting Valforte had higher NDF than Appulo. Intervention effect Under drought at flowering, Valforte had the greatest hemicellulose increase. Intervention effect Under drought at flowering, Valforte had the greatest decrease in cell dimensions. Association Osmotic potential was not significantly related to mesophyll cell characters. Association Cell wall elasticity, morphology and leaf tissue chemistry were uncorrelated. Association At flowering, total fiber and hemicellulose per leaf area correlated with TW/DW. Intervention effect The TW/DW ratio fell more under water stress as hemicellulose accumulated. Mechanism Cell wall absorptive capacity may affect osmotic volume. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Severe osmotic stress substantially decrease d root dry weight and root-to-shoot ratios.
Treatmentsevere osmotic stress e0 Outcomeroot dry weight, root to shoot length ratio and root to shoot dry weight ratio e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “root dry weight , root to shoot length ratio and root to shoot dry weight ratio also increased under low osmotic stress, although severe osmotic stress caused a sizeable decrease in their values ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1206 e1 “Twenty promising spring durum wheat genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–190 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Temperature increase significantly decrease d shoot and root length, biovolume index, and dry shoot weight .
Treatmentincreased temperature (+2 °C) e1 Outcomeshoot/root length, biovolume index, and dry/shoot weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The morphometrical assay showed a significant decrease in almost all the evaluated traits (shoot/root length, biovolume index, and dry /shoot weight ) except in the dry root weight and the root:shoot ratio ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–600 t0 “Durum Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–77 e1 “increased temperature (+2 °C) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–310 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Rise in exchangeable sodium percentage decrease d dry matter production of onion and garlic
Organ / stagestages of growth e0 Outcomedry matter production e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There was continuous decrease in dry matter production at I (30 days after tranplanting and sowing of onion and garlic, respectively) and U (at harvesting) stages of growth and in diameter, weight and yield of bulb of the two test crops with rise in ESP ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–481 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Rise in exchangeable sodium percentage decrease d bulb diameter, weight and yield of onion and garlic
Outcomediameter, weight and yield of bulb e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There was continuous decrease in dry matter production at I (30 days after tranplanting and sowing of onion and garlic, respectively) and U (at harvesting) stages of growth and in diameter, weight and yield of bulb of the two test crops with rise in ESP ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–481 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Ethephon progressively decrease d shoot length and biomass of onion and garlic.
OutcomeShoot length and biomass e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Shoot length and biomass of onion and garlic, expressed either in fresh or dry weight , increased significantly under GA3, while a progressive decrease under Prohex-Ca and Ethephon occurred ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–469 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Confined aphids reduced plant dry weight to 62% of controls.
Treatmentaphids were confined e0 Outcomedry wt of the plant e0 Directiondecrease inferred e0 Verbatim
e0 “When the aphids were confined the dry wt of the plant after 14 days infestation was 62% of the controls ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–305 e1 “Aphis craccivora were either confined to the second trifoliate leaf of 19‐day‐old plants of Vigna sesquipedalis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 45–156 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Freely moving aphids reduced plant dry weight to 29·5% of controls.
Outcomedry wt of the plant e2 Directiondecrease inferred e0 Verbatim
e0 “when they were free to move, it was 29·5% of controls ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–360 e1 “Aphis craccivora were either confined to the second trifoliate leaf of 19‐day‐old plants of Vigna sesquipedalis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 45–156 e2 “dry wt of the plant after 14 days infestation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–281 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Genotypic correlation of pod yield per plant with cluster length is negative (-0.058).
Materialforty-five genotypes e0 Outcomepod yield per plant e1 Directiondecrease inferred e2 Qualifiercluster length e2 SettingCollege of Horticulture, Kolar, Karnataka e0 Verbatim
e0 “studies of forty-five genotypes of yard long bean, at College of Horticulture, Kolar, Karnataka ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–153 e1 “pod yield per plant (g) had a significant and positive association with traits like number of cluster per plant (0.742G 0.556P), number of pods per plant (0.703G 0.673P), average pod weight (0.669G 0.608P), pod length (0.627G 0.561P), number of pods per cluster (0.447G 0.326P), vine length (0.327G 0.295P), primary branches (0.317G 0.310P) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–819 e2 “exhibited stable positive association at genotypic and phenotypic level with traits except days to first flowering (-0.255), days to 50 per cent (-0.206), days to first harvest (-0.146), cluster length (-0.058) and pod girth (-0.016) at genotypic level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1108 Other claims from this paper (17) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.