View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Average inbred net return was 38% below hybrid net return .
Average net return e0 Verbatim
e0 “Average net return of inbred rice was 38% lower compared to that of hybrid rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1267 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Gross return , net return and B:C ratio were higher with the treatment.
this treatment e0 gross return, net return and B:C ratio e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Further the gross return , net return and B:C ratio were also higher with this treatment. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1451 t0 “rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Rice rice rice system recorded the highest net return .
Verbatim
e0 “Rice rice rice system registered the highest net return ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–457 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Maize French bean intercropping gave higher net return and return per rupee.
maize + French bean e0 net return and net return per rupee investment e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the net return and net return per rupee investment were higher in maize + French bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1169 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Hybrid maize Seed Tech 2324 had higher net return per hectare and net return per rupee than the other cultivars.
net return per hectare and net return per rupee e1 higher inferred e1 Among the various cultivars e2 Verbatim
t0 “TROPICAL MAIZE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–89 e1 “hybrid maize Seed Tech 2324 produced the highest yield attributes yield of grain and net return per hectare and net return per rupee also ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–587 e2 “Among the various cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–448 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The regime achieved high net economic return .
net economic return e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “high net economic return were achieved with this regime. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–907 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Net return paralleled yield.
Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Variable cost/ net return calculations showed that net return paralleled yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1412 e1 “winter or spring wheat (Triticum aestivum ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–694 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
RDF+WL maximized gross return , net return and benefit-cost ratio.
Gross return, net return, benefit: cost ratio e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Gross return , net return , benefit: cost ratio was highest in RDF+WL. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2345–2413 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect RDF improved tiller density, shoot emergence ratio, height and dry matter, at par with SSNM-7 and SSNM-8. Intervention effect RDF minimized lodging angle, lodged area and lodging score. Intervention effect RDF maximized grain yield, harvest index and financial returns. Intervention effect RDF maximized grain nitrogen and phosphorus uptake, while SSNM-8 maximized potassium uptake. Intervention effect Nutrient doses above RDF favoured lodging. Intervention effect GR2 increased emergence and tiller density and reduced mortality. Intervention effect GR2 increased dry matter, leaf area index and thousand-grain weight. Intervention effect GR1 minimized height and internode length and had higher grain yield and harvest index. Intervention effect RDF with GR1 lowered lodging angle, lodged area and score. Intervention effect RDF with GR2 increased thousand-grain weight. Intervention effect RDF with GR1 maximized grain yield and harvest index. Intervention effect Experiment 2 treatments did not affect tiller density, shoot emergence ratio or height. Intervention effect RDF+WL maximized dry matter, leaf area index, peduncle and internode length and time to maturity. Intervention effect RDF plus nano-silicon minimized lodging angle, lodged area and score. Intervention effect RDF+WL maximized thousand-grain weight, at par with RDF+IL plus nanosilicon. Intervention effect RDF+WL maximized grain, biological and straw yield and harvest index. Intervention effect Ethrel, KC1 and nano-silicon improved recovery from induced lodging, with nano-silicon most effective. Intervention effect Chemical recovery was incomplete and yield remained much lower than RDF+WL. Recommendation The authors recommend RDF with cycocel to minimize wheat lodging and increase grain yield. Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
PBW826 gave superior net return (80163 Rs ha-1).
Verbatim
e0 “net return (80163 Rs ha-1) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1014 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 Other claims from this paper (17)
not stated 781 Observation author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Rampage has promise for increasing net return per acre.
increasing net return per acre e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “increasing net return per acre ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 124–154 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
T3 had the highest gross return , net return and BCR.
gross return, net return and BCR e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the highest gross return , net return and BCR were recorded in the T3 treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1910–1988 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The IPM module increased net return .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “The studies also showed that net return was also higher. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–627 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Crop geometry 45×10 gave the highest gross return , net return and net return per rupee investment.
gross return, net return and net return per rupee investment e6 Verbatim
t0 “Effect of ridge and furrow system in soybean cultivation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56 e6 “Crop geometry was recorded highest gross return , net return and net return per rupee investment in 45×10 and lowest in 45×30 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1535 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Gross return , net return and net return per rupee investment were higher for RSC 1046 than for CG Soya 1.
gross return, net return and net return per rupee investment e5 Verbatim
t0 “Effect of ridge and furrow system in soybean cultivation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56 e5 “There was gross return , net return and net return per rupee investment higher in variety RSC 1046 and lowest in CG Soya 1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1409 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage net return was lower than conventional-tillage net return .
Verbatim
e0 “Soybean yield and net return were lower in NT compared to CT systems ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1462 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Improved technology produced net monetary return of ₹47565/ha.
net monetary return e0 Verbatim
e0 “net monetary return ₹47565/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–729 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–50 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Demonstration net return was Rs. 67036/ha.
Verbatim
e0 “The net return in demonstration technology was Rs. 67036/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–523 t0 “Chickpea Crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–79 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage produced significantly higher gross return , net return and benefit-cost ratio.
conventional tillage e0 gross return, net return and B:C ratio e0 minimum and zero tillage practices e0 Verbatim
t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–102 e0 “Significantly higher gross return , net return and B:C ratio were recorded in conventional tillage as compared to minimum and zero tillage practices. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–541 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The treatment gave net return of Rs. 53067 ha−1.
Verbatim
e0 “net return of Rs. 53067 ha−1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–801 e1 “groundnut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed free management maximized net return .
Weed Management t0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “maximum net return (78857 Rs/ha) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–662 t0 “Weed Management in Kharif Groundnut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The herbicide combination generated net return of `42190/ha.
Verbatim
e0 “gross return (` 66360/ha), net return (`42190/ha) and B:C ratio (2.75). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1452 t0 “groundnut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–59 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Subsurface drip gave the highest grower net return through higher cotton yield.
Subsurface drip irrigation e0 net return to the grower e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Subsurface drip irrigation produced the highest net return to the grower through increased cotton yields. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–259 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The intervention added a net return of `13775/ha.
additional net return e0 Verbatim
e0 “additional net return of `13775/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–726 e1 “technological intervention consisting of cotton + sweet corn intercropping + enriched compost ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–345 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cowpen performed better in cotton MCU 5 and gave the maximum net return .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “For cotton var. MCU 5, cowpen performed better in the same system and gave maximum net return ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–460 Other claims from this paper (1) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Vertisol produced more net return than Alfisol.
Verbatim
e0 “yield and net return were more in Vertisol compared to Alfisol ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–897 t0 “Pigeonpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Net return followed the yield trend across spacing treatments.
Verbatim
e0 “similar trend was obtained with net return ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–427 t0 “pigeonpea hybrid ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–74 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The improved technology gave higher gross return , net return and benefit/cost ratio than farmers practices.
improved technology e0 gross return, net return with higher benefit/cost ratio e0 farmers' practices e0 Verbatim
e0 “The improved technology gave higher gross return , net return with higher benefit/cost ratio than farmers' practices ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–952 t0 “pigeonpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–67 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane with potato gave higher autumn net return .
Sugarcane + Potato e0 Verbatim
e0 “Sugarcane + Potato and Sugarcane Lentil gave higher net return in Autumn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–631 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane with lentil gave higher autumn net return .
Sugarcane Lentil e0 Verbatim
e0 “Sugarcane + Potato and Sugarcane Lentil gave higher net return in Autumn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–631 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The combination achieved maximum net return of Rs.321254/ha.
Verbatim
e0 “net return (Rs.321254/ha) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1063 t0 “Sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Oryza sativa
Zea mays
Triticum aestivum
Glycine max
Cicer arietinum
Arachis hypogaea
Gossypium hirsutum
Cajanus cajan