View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit produced a nonsignificant decrease in stomatal conductance.
water deficit stress e0 stomatal conductance e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 e0 “water deficit stress caused significant decrease in flag leaf area and unsignificant decrease in stomatal conductance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–824 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Thiourea tended to decrease straw yield nonsignificantly.
application of TU e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “While the straw yield showed a decrease trend with the application of TU. Decrease in straw yield, although marginal was statistically in significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1217 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Closest loci had no significant diversity decrease beyond drift expectations.
no significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “no significant decrease in gene diversity was found at the closest loci ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1190 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
ePE6d precise small edits did not decrease significantly relative to ePE2.
precise edits by ePE6d e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
t0 “rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–64 e0 “a significant decrease in precise edits by ePE6d was not observed throughout the targets ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2001–2089 Other claims from this paper (19) Method / resource Both ePE6c and ePE6d precisely edited rice calli, at average rates of 7.08% and 19.82%. Method / resource ePE6c had 1.83- to 10.12-fold lower small-edit efficiency than ePE2. Method / resource ePE6d generated 11.62- to 580.98-fold more pegRNA scaffold byproducts than ePE2. Method / resource ePE6c HA tag insertion efficiency was 6.87-fold lower than ePE2. Method / resource ePE6d precise HA insertion reached 15.56%, 8.36-fold above ePE2, at ERF141-T. Method / resource ePE6d precise HA insertion reached 14.10%, 2.72-fold above ePE2, at HLH109-T. Method / resource ePE6d precise HA insertion reached 32.15%, 2.65-fold above ePE2, at TubA1-T. Observation Incomplete insertions followed by flanking sequence replicates were the main ePE6d byproducts. Method / resource ePE6d byproducts stayed comparable to ePE2 at HLH109-T and TubA1-T but rose slightly at ERF141-T. Method / resource Precise c-MYC editing efficiency did not significantly differ between ePE2 and ePE6d. Observation Predicted pegRNA extension structure for c-MYC was more disordered than for HA. Method / resource ePE6d induced precise insertions in 20.83% to 70.83% of T0 lines versus 4.17% to 18.75% for ePE2. Method / resource Transgenic byproducts occurred at comparable frequencies of 10.94% with ePE2 and 11.46% with ePE6d. Method / resource ePE6d increased CBP insertion at ERF141-T, HLH109-T and TubA1-T by 2.26-, 5.65- and 7.56-fold, respectively. Method / resource ePE6d improved 3×c-MYC insertion overall by 4.47-fold, reaching 33.84% at ERF141-T. Method / resource ePE6d had higher edit to byproduct ratios than ePE2 in five of six edits. Method / resource Tagged transgenic lines for CBP increased from 7.64% under ePE2 to 50% under ePE6d. Method / resource Tagged transgenic lines for 3×c-MYC increased from 13.89% under ePE2 to 56.94% under ePE6d. Method / resource ePE6d achieved maximal precise editing of 81.25% of T0 lines for CBP at TubA1-T and 66.67% for 3×c-MYC at ERF141-T; three other tags included successful 3×HA and 3×AVI insertion but no intact GB1 insertion. Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
NDGA did not significantly decrease ABA content.
did not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 e0 “NDGA in hibited the expression of ABA-responsive gene, but did not significantly decrease ABA content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–954 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The double mutant showed a further numeric but nonsignificant disease decrease versus ΔtoxA.
disease development e0 Verbatim
e0 “A double mutant deficient in both serine metalloprotease and toxoflavin (ΔtoxA/prtA − ) exhibited a further numeric but not statistically significant decrease of disease development compared with the ΔtoxA strain ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–1009 e1 “a major bacterial disease of rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–91 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
One cluster had a nonsignificant yield decrease with narrower rows.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “one had a nonsignificant yield decrease as RS narrowed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1183 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–32 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Pods per plant varied in a decrease – in crease– decrease pattern with dose, without significance.
dose increment e0 decrease-increase-decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The pods, seeds and seed weight per plant as well as hundred-seed weight showed the same trend of decrease - in crease- decrease along with the dose in crement. However, these variations did not reach a significant level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–632 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Seeds per plant varied in a decrease – in crease– decrease pattern with dose, without significance.
dose increment e0 decrease-increase-decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The pods, seeds and seed weight per plant as well as hundred-seed weight showed the same trend of decrease - in crease- decrease along with the dose in crement. However, these variations did not reach a significant level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–632 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79 Other claims from this paper (8)
not stated 25 Observation observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Lara showed a statistically in significant straw yield decrease .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “The Lara variety showed an in significant decrease in the straw yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1207 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Ear shading caused a slightly greater yield decrease for Proctor and Herta, without significant varietal differences.
shading the ears e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in grain yield by shading the ears was slightly greater for Proctor and Herta, the differences were not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1781 Other claims from this paper (19) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil in oculum density did not significantly decrease from 1 to 12 months after in corporation.
soil inoculum density e0 not a significant decrease e0 1 and 12 months e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Regardless of treatment, there was not a significant decrease in soil in oculum density between 1 and 12 months after residue was in corporated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–907 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought did not significantly decrease starch.
drought stress e1 without a significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “This occurred without a significant decrease in starch. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–832 t0 “maize plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–66 e1 “Another consequence of drought stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–639 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Chilling part of the root did not cause a significant decrease in shoot water content.
chilling of a part of the root e1 shoot water content e1 did not cause any significant decrease e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “maize plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 e1 “The chilling of a part of the root did not cause any significant decrease in shoot water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–96 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Full season maize hybrids showed a nonsignificant yield decrease with maturity.
full season hybrids e0 Verbatim
e0 “non-significant decrease in grain yield with relative maturity in full season hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1130 t0 “Maize (Zea mays L.) Hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–85 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Jelica line 4 had no significant decrease in tuber yield under field conditions.
OCI/OCII Jelica line 4 e0 did not exhibit a significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “the OCI/OCII Jelica line 4 did not exhibit a significant decrease in tuber yield. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1337 t0 “Phenotypic performance of transgenic potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plants with pyramided rice cystatin genes (OCI and OCII) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–123 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Potato tuber quality did not significantly decline.
quality of potato tubers e0 without a significant decrease e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “without a significant decrease in the quality of potato tubers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1903–1965 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease dry weight in potato.
supplemental enhancement of 32 mW m −2 effective UV-B radiation e0 not significantly decreased e0 control plants that received only solar UV-B radiation e0 Verbatim
e0 “The dry weights of all 4 species and pea and wheat plant height were not significantly decrease d by a supplemental enhancement of 32 mW m −2 effective UV-B radiation from cellulose acetate filtered FS-40 sunlamps for 6 hours each day, relative to control plants that received only solar UV-B radiation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1138 e1 “potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–147 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
All cultivars germinated at all NaCl levels with no significant decrease in germination.
without a significant decrease e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “3 pea cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–232 e2 “All cultivars were able to germinate at all NaCl levels without a significant decrease in germination ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1179 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At 50mM NaCl, pea germination and growth traits showed no significant decrease .
NaCl 50mM NaCl e0 germination and growth traits e0 without a significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “seeds of pea were able to germinate at low salinity levels (NaCl 50mM NaCl) without a significant decrease in germination and growth traits ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–617 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Chlorophyll a and b did not decrease significantly in Santi, BC11, BC91, BC14 and BARI-1.
Santi, BC11, BC91, BC14 and BARI-1 e0 iron deficiency t0 chlorophyll a and b concentrations e0 not significantly decreased e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “chlorophyll a and b concentrations were not significantly decrease d in Santi, BC11, BC91, BC14 and BARI-1. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–515 t0 “pea genotypes tolerant to iron deficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–63 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect Iron deficiency significantly reduced chlorophyll a and b in Parafield, BC17 and IPSA-2. Intervention effect Fe deficiency significantly reduced leaf number, shoot height and shoot weight in Parafield, BC17, BD14 and IPSA-2. Intervention effect Santi, BC11, BC91 and BARI-1 showed no prominent growth decrease under Fe deficiency. Intervention effect Fe deficiency significantly reduced root length and biomass in Parafield, BC17 and IPSA-2. Intervention effect Root length and biomass were unchanged under Fe shortage in Santi, BC11, BC91, BC14 and BARI-1. Observation Santi, BC11, BC91 and BARI-1 were classified as Fe deficiency tolerant. Observation BC14 was classified as intermediate in Fe deficiency tolerance. Observation Parafield, BC17 and IPSA2 were classified as Fe deficiency sensitive. Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Using SNP subsets based on functional annotation did not significantly decrease chickpea grain-yield prediction accuracy.
prediction accuracy for grain yield e0 did not significantly decrease e0 whole SNP dataset e0 Not reported Value
Verbatim
e0 “Compared with the whole SNP dataset, a subset of SNPs did not significantly decrease prediction accuracy for grain yield despite consisting of a smaller number of SNPs. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1840 e1 “chickpea breeding lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–356 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Zinc doses decrease d chickpea P content, though the dose effects were statistically in significant.
grain and stem components e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Chickpea Plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–93 e0 “humic acid and zinc doses in creased the content of N and K in the chickpea plants in grain and stem components, while a decrease in the content of P was observed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1035 e1 “the effect of different doses of humic acid and zinc on the N, P and K content of chickpea was statistically in significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1167 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid doses decrease d chickpea P content, though the dose effects were statistically in significant.
grain and stem components e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Chickpea Plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–93 e0 “humic acid and zinc doses in creased the content of N and K in the chickpea plants in grain and stem components, while a decrease in the content of P was observed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1035 e1 “the effect of different doses of humic acid and zinc on the N, P and K content of chickpea was statistically in significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1167 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Weakly virulent viral in fection caused an in significant decrease in these kinetic values.
infected with a weakly virulent strain of the virus e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “tobacco leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–79 e0 “The decrease of these values in plants in fected with a weakly virulent strain of the virus was in significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–756 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Fertilization was associated with a decrease in carbohydrate content in leaves, not significant.
fertilized plants e5 carbohydrates content e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Experimental Station of Tobacco Cultivation in Zamość, Poland ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–127 e5 “the rise of nicotine and protein content as well as the decrease in carbohydrates content was observed in the leaves of fertilized plants but these changes were not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–797 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A CO2 step decrease in creased mesophyll conductance by 26-38% in tobacco, without statistical significance.
step decrease from 1000 to 200 ppm e0 Verbatim
e0 “following a step decrease from 1000 to 200 ppm, the 26-38% in crease in g(m) was not statistically significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1017 e1 “two Arabidopsis genotypes ( in cluding a mutant with open stomata, ost1), tobacco and wheat. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–415 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Grafting did not significantly decrease root-knot severity.
root-knot severity e1 did not significantly decrease e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Tomato production in Ohio protected culture systems is hindered by a soilborne disease complex consisting of corky root rot (Pyrenochaeta lycopersici ), black dot root rot (Colletotrichum coccodes ), Verticillium wilt (Verticillium dahliae ), and root-knot (Meloidogyne hapla and M. in cognita )
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–290 e1 “Root-knot severity was lower in plants grown in ASD-treated soils in high tunnels compared with plants grown in control soils, but grafting did not significantly decrease root-knot severity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1552 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Combined chemicals and biopesticides lowered marketed amount by 62.44 kg per farmer, without statistical significance.
both chemicals and biopesticides e0 62.44 kg per farmer e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “farmers who used both chemicals and biopesticides experienced a loss in tomato yield by 9.58 kg per decimal of land and a decrease in marketed amount by 62.44 kg per farmer, though statistically in significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1200 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cutting did not significantly change lipophilic antioxidant activity.
did not influence e0 control fruits e0 Verbatim
e0 “Cutting resulted in a decrease in the HAA compared to control fruits and did not in fluence significantly the LAA ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–521 e1 “tomato fruits harvested at three different stages of maturity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–154 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivumt0
Oryza sativa
Glycine max
Zea mays
Solanum tuberosum
Lathyrus oleraceus
Cicer arietinum
Nicotiana tabacum
Solanum lycopersicum
Meloidogyne hapla_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Meloidogyne incognita