View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Susceptible genotypes had a significant decrease in relative water content under salinity.
MaterialICC 249 & ICC 247 e0 Treatmentsalinity stress t0 Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “significant decrease in total chlorophyll and relative water content in susceptible genotypes (ICC 249 & ICC 247) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1039 t0 “Screening and evaluation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes for salinity stress tolerance: A biochemical, physiological and yield assessment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–148 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In fection by Albugo Candida caused a nonsignificant decrease of relative water content in Cakile maritima .
Outcomerelative water content e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Puccinia lagenophorae , in fecting Senecio glaucus and Albugo Candida in fecting Cakile maritima during late in fection ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–452 e1 “The in fection of Senecio caused a significant decrease of relative water content , while the in fection of Cakile caused a nonsignificant decrease of the same parameter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–770 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing salinity substantially decrease d root relative water content .
Treatmentincrease in salinity levels e0 Outcomeroot relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The in crease in salinity levels resulted in a substantial decrease in root relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–481 e1 “Walnut ( J. regia L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–21 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content decrease d nearly 16 percent during dehydration.
Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in relative water content of nearly 16% during dehydration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–359 t0 “Parkinsonia aculeata ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–102 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought treatments significantly decrease d soil water content , leaf water potential, and leaf relative water content .
TreatmentDrought treatments (M2 and M3) e0 Outcomesoil water content, leaf water potential, leaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Macroptilium bracteatum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–74 e0 “Drought treatments (M2 and M3) significantly (P < 0.05) decrease soil water content , leaf water potential, leaf relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–773 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought stress decrease d relative water content by 48%.
Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “DS in itially caused a 48% decrease in relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–826 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity reduced chickpea chlorophyll content , relative water content and water retention capacity.
Treatmentsalinity stress e0 Outcomechlorophyll content, a decrease in relative water content, a decline in water retention capacity e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “salinity stress which in cluded a reduction in chlorophyll content , a decrease in relative water content , a decline in water retention capacity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1668 e1 “salinity stress on chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–289 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought significantly decrease d maize relative water content .
Treatmentdrought condition e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “drought condition caused a significant decrease in biomass, total chlorophyll, relative water content (RWC) of the plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–983 t0 “Zea mays seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf relative water content fell 25% in experiment 1.
Treatmentwater-deficit stress t0 Outcomeleaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “25 and 29% decrease in leaf relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1047 t0 “tomato under water -deficit stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–170 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf relative water content fell 29% in experiment 2.
Treatmentwater-deficit stress t0 Outcomeleaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “25 and 29% decrease in leaf relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1047 t0 “tomato under water -deficit stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–170 Other claims from this paper (13) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.