View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Thinning appeared to reduce total foliage biomass .
Outcometotal foliage biomass e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Shortleaf Pine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–97 e0 “thinning seemed to reduce the total foliage biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1045 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The in vestigated factors had a higher impact on tuber biomass than on foliage biomass in radishes.
Treatmentinvestigated factors e5 Outcomebiomass of tuber e5 Comparatorbiomass of foliage e5 Verbatim
e1 “growth of radishes (Raphanus sativus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–195 e5 “in vestigated factors had higher impact on biomass of tuber than biomass of foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1125 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilizer prolonged the in crease in foliage biomass .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “there was evidence of a prolonged in crease in foliage biomass due to N fertilizer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–694 t0 “Corsican pine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–108 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Dinitroaniline herbicides did not affect peanut foliage biomass at mid or late season.
TreatmentDinitroaniline herbicides e0 Qualifiermid- and late-season e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Dinitroaniline herbicides neither visually in jured peanut nor affected foliage biomass collected at mid- and late-season ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–836 t0 “Peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Combined treatments 4 and 5 gave the lowest foliage dry biomass .
Treatmenttreatments 4 and 5 e0 Outcomefoliage dry biomass e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the foliage dry biomass was significantly lowest for plants in treatments 4 and 5 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–902 e1 “lead (Pb) phytoextraction by ryegrass (Lolium perenne ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–168 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Compost at 40–80% decreased lisianthus foliage and biomass .
Treatmenthigh ratios (40–80%) e0 Outcomefoliage and biomass e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “cut lisianthus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 e0 “high ratios (40–80%) resulted in a decrease in foliage and biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1438 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Coppicing and pollarding significantly affected the production of foliage and branchwood biomass .
Taxonagroforestry tree species t0 TreatmentCoppicing and pollarding e1 Outcomeproduction of foliage and branchwood biomass e1 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
t0 “coppiced and pollarded agroforestry tree species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–103 e1 “Coppicing and pollarding significantly affected the production of foliage and branchwood biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1394 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage biomass did not decrease under heavy metal exposure.
Treatmentexperimental exposure to copper/zinc/cadmium lead = 640/3000/10/90 mg/kg t1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “no reduction of foliage biomass was recorded ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–550 t0 “Sycamore Maple ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–63 t1 “experimental exposure to copper/zinc/cadmium lead = 640/3000/10/90 mg/kg ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–310 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Hoagland solution produced highest foliage yield, root biomass and photosynthesis.
TreatmentHoagland solution e0 OutcomeGreen and dry foliage yield, root biomass and photosynthetic rate e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “maize plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–95 e0 “Green and dry foliage yield, root biomass and photosynthetic rate were highest with Hoagland solution ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–609 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The ratio of foliage biomass to total biomass was 32% in the harvested stand and 42% in the control stand.
Treatmentharvested stand e1 Outcomeratio of foliage biomass to total biomass e1 Comparatorcontrol stand e1 Verbatim
e1 “The ratio of foliage biomass to total biomass was 32% in the harvested stand and 42% in the control stand ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–924 t0 “Korean Pine (Pinus koraiensis ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–42 Other claims from this paper (13) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.