Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recovery treatment reduced tree growth rates.

Taxon: trembling aspene0
Treatment: recovery treatmente1
Outcome: growth ratese1
Direction: lowere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–414

e1
“Trees in the recovery treatment also exhibited lower growth rates and increased xylem damage in their older rings.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1063

Title

Lack of Hydraulic Acclimation in Response to Multiple Droughts and Recovery

Jaycie C. Fickle; Kelly L. Kerr; Lillie I. Congram; et al. Plant Cell & Environment 2026. doi:10.1111/pce.70671

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect A recovery year between two droughts gave trees less drought resilience than consecutive drought treatments.
Intervention effect Recovery treatment increased xylem damage in older rings.
Intervention effect No hydraulic acclimation to severe drought was detected over time.
Intervention effect The authors infer severe repeated drought raises hydraulic vulnerability.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After compound 4i treatment, average recovery rates of the maize growth index exceeded 72%.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment: compound 4ie0
Outcome: average recovery rates of growth indexe0
Direction: exceedede0
Value: 72%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56

e0
“After being treated by compound 4i, average recovery rates of growth index exceeded 72%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–731

Title

Novel Thiazole Phenoxypyridine Derivatives Protect Maize from Residual Pesticide Injury Caused by PPO-Inhibitor Fomesafen

Li-Xia Zhao; Min-Lei Yin; Qing-Rui Wang; et al. Biomolecules 2019. doi:10.3390/biom9100514

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth rates of most species increased during the recovery following sulfur dioxide stress.

Taxon: Plant communityt0
Treatment: sulfur dioxide stresst0
Outcome: growth rates of most speciese2
Direction: increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2
“The recovery pattern following stress involved (i) increased growth rates of most species”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–313

t0
“Plant community repair following sulfur dioxide stress on an old-field ecosystem”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80

Title

Plant community repair following sulfur dioxide stress on an old-field ecosystem

W. D. Cocking OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) 1974

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Single and repeated sulfur dioxide fumigation resulted in foliar necrosis in plant community plots.
Intervention effect By late summer, living tissue in fumigated plots equalled control levels.
Observation The recovery after sulfur dioxide stress involved restructuring of the plant community species composition.
Observation Late season grasses comprised 25.2% of the end-of-season control herbage.
Intervention effect Late season grasses comprised as much as 61.4% of the stands under sulfur dioxide stresses, compared with control.
Association The interval between sulfur dioxide stresses had a significant effect on the plant community.
Intervention effect A brief one-day separation between stresses resulted in a greater pulse of damage.
Intervention effect A brief one-day separation between stresses resulted in higher subsequent growth rates.
Intervention effect More widely spaced stresses (1/2-month) produced greater total damage.
Intervention effect More widely spaced stresses (1/2-month) produced more extensive changes in species composition.
Intervention effect Photosynthetic potential in the balance of the summer was reduced by 17.0% by one fumigation.
Intervention effect Photosynthetic potential in the balance of the summer was reduced by 23.8% by two stresses over a brief interval.
Intervention effect Photosynthetic potential in the balance of the summer was reduced by 31.6% when the perturbations were separated by one-half month.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant 15N recovery rates were greater in the I540 irrigation treatments than in the I405 treatments.

Taxon: CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment: I540 treatmentse0
Outcome: Plant 15N recovery ratese0
Direction: greatere0
Comparator: I405 treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0
“Plant 15N recovery rates were greater (i) in the I540 treatments than in the I405 treatments”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–975

t0
“Cotton growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13

Title

Cotton growth and the fate of N fertilizer as affected by saline water irrigation and N fertigation in a drip-irrigated field

Wei Min; Huijuan Guo; Zhiqiang Hu; et al. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science 2017. doi:10.1080/09064710.2017.1338309

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Cotton biomass, N uptake and yield increased as irrigation amount increased.
Intervention effect Cotton biomass, N uptake and yield increased as N amount increased.
Intervention effect Cotton biomass, N uptake and yield were significantly less with saline water (SW) than with fresh water (FW) and brackish water (BW).
Intervention effect Plant 15N recovery rates were greater in the N360 treatments than in the N240 treatments.
Intervention effect Plant 15N recovery rates in brackish water (BW) were 7.98% greater than in fresh water (FW).
Intervention effect Plant 15N recovery rates in brackish water (BW) were 30.01% greater than in saline water (SW).
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N increased as N fertilizer amount increased.
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N declined as irrigation amount increased.
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N in brackish water (BW) treatments was 6.02% greater than in fresh water (FW).
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N in saline water (SW) treatments was 21.44% greater than in fresh water (FW).
Intervention effect Total 15N recovery was significantly greater in brackish water (BW) than in fresh water (FW) and saline water (SW).
Intervention effect 15N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in irrigation amount.
Intervention effect 15N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in irrigation water salinity.
Intervention effect 15N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in N rate.
Intervention effect The authors suggest that, with appropriate amounts of irrigation water and N fertilizer, brackish irrigation water (4.61 dS/m) will not affect cotton growth, yield and N recovery.
Intervention effect The authors conclude that saline irrigation water (EC > 8 dS/m) reduces cotton growth, yield and N use efficiency.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Droughted maize seedlings had higher relative growth and net assimilation rates in recovery.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: droughtede0
Outcome: RGR and NARe0
Direction: highere0
Qualifier: during recoverye0
Comparator: non‐droughted seedlingse0

Verbatim

e0
“RGR and NAR of droughted maize seedlings were higher than those of non‐droughted seedlings during recovery, irrespective of the growth medium (perlite or hydroponic)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1352

t0
“maize (Zea mays)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–76

Title

Drought enhances chilling tolerance in a chilling‐sensitive maize (Zea mays) variety

JUAN J. IRIGOYEN; JAVIER PEREZ DE JUAN; MANUEL SANCHEZ‐DIAZ New Phytologist 1996. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01145.x

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Pre-drought reduced chilling-induced leaf necrosis.
Intervention effect Droughted plants had higher leaf water status after chilling.
Mechanism Drought-induced stomatal closure was proposed to explain higher water status.
Intervention effect Chilling reduced carbon dioxide exchange similarly in droughted and untreated seedlings.
Intervention effect During recovery, droughted seedlings had higher carbon dioxide fixation.
Mechanism The authors inferred that stomatal limitation did not cause chilling-induced CER inhibition.
Intervention effect Droughted maize had better photosynthetic water-use efficiency.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N fertilizer rates decreased apparent N recovery and N use efficiency of rice.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae6
Treatment: increasing rates of N fertilizere6
Outcome: apparent N recovery and Nuse efficiencye6
Direction: decreasee6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e6
“There was a significant increase in the N uptake of the rice but a decrease in the apparent N recovery and Nuse efficiency of applied fertilizer N, with the application of increasing rates of N fertilizer”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1215

t0
“rice growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39

Title

Effect of nitrogen rates on rice growth and biological nitrogen fixation

R. Carreres; R. González Tomé; J. Sendra; et al. The Journal of Agricultural Science 1996. doi:10.1017/s002185960007845x

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant 15N recovery rates in brackish water (BW) were 7.98% greater than in fresh water (FW).

Taxon: CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment: BWe0
Outcome: Plant 15N recovery ratese0
Direction: greatere0
Value: 7.98%e0
Comparator: FWe0

Verbatim

e0
“Plant 15N recovery rates in BW were 7.98% and 30.01% greater than those in FW and SW, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1135

t0
“Cotton growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13

Title

Cotton growth and the fate of N fertilizer as affected by saline water irrigation and N fertigation in a drip-irrigated field

Wei Min; Huijuan Guo; Zhiqiang Hu; et al. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science 2017. doi:10.1080/09064710.2017.1338309

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Cotton biomass, N uptake and yield increased as irrigation amount increased.
Intervention effect Cotton biomass, N uptake and yield increased as N amount increased.
Intervention effect Cotton biomass, N uptake and yield were significantly less with saline water (SW) than with fresh water (FW) and brackish water (BW).
Intervention effect Plant 15N recovery rates were greater in the I540 irrigation treatments than in the I405 treatments.
Intervention effect Plant 15N recovery rates were greater in the N360 treatments than in the N240 treatments.
Intervention effect Plant 15N recovery rates in brackish water (BW) were 30.01% greater than in saline water (SW).
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N increased as N fertilizer amount increased.
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N declined as irrigation amount increased.
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N in brackish water (BW) treatments was 6.02% greater than in fresh water (FW).
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N in saline water (SW) treatments was 21.44% greater than in fresh water (FW).
Intervention effect Total 15N recovery was significantly greater in brackish water (BW) than in fresh water (FW) and saline water (SW).
Intervention effect 15N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in irrigation amount.
Intervention effect 15N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in irrigation water salinity.
Intervention effect 15N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in N rate.
Intervention effect The authors suggest that, with appropriate amounts of irrigation water and N fertilizer, brackish irrigation water (4.61 dS/m) will not affect cotton growth, yield and N recovery.
Intervention effect The authors conclude that saline irrigation water (EC > 8 dS/m) reduces cotton growth, yield and N use efficiency.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant 15N recovery rates in brackish water (BW) were 30.01% greater than in saline water (SW).

Taxon: CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment: BWe0
Outcome: Plant 15N recovery ratese0
Direction: greatere0
Value: 30.01%e0
Comparator: SWe0

Verbatim

e0
“Plant 15N recovery rates in BW were 7.98% and 30.01% greater than those in FW and SW, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1135

t0
“Cotton growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13

Title

Cotton growth and the fate of N fertilizer as affected by saline water irrigation and N fertigation in a drip-irrigated field

Wei Min; Huijuan Guo; Zhiqiang Hu; et al. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science 2017. doi:10.1080/09064710.2017.1338309

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Cotton biomass, N uptake and yield increased as irrigation amount increased.
Intervention effect Cotton biomass, N uptake and yield increased as N amount increased.
Intervention effect Cotton biomass, N uptake and yield were significantly less with saline water (SW) than with fresh water (FW) and brackish water (BW).
Intervention effect Plant 15N recovery rates were greater in the I540 irrigation treatments than in the I405 treatments.
Intervention effect Plant 15N recovery rates were greater in the N360 treatments than in the N240 treatments.
Intervention effect Plant 15N recovery rates in brackish water (BW) were 7.98% greater than in fresh water (FW).
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N increased as N fertilizer amount increased.
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N declined as irrigation amount increased.
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N in brackish water (BW) treatments was 6.02% greater than in fresh water (FW).
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N in saline water (SW) treatments was 21.44% greater than in fresh water (FW).
Intervention effect Total 15N recovery was significantly greater in brackish water (BW) than in fresh water (FW) and saline water (SW).
Intervention effect 15N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in irrigation amount.
Intervention effect 15N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in irrigation water salinity.
Intervention effect 15N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in N rate.
Intervention effect The authors suggest that, with appropriate amounts of irrigation water and N fertilizer, brackish irrigation water (4.61 dS/m) will not affect cotton growth, yield and N recovery.
Intervention effect The authors conclude that saline irrigation water (EC > 8 dS/m) reduces cotton growth, yield and N use efficiency.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant 15N recovery rates were greater in the N360 treatments than in the N240 treatments.

Taxon: CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment: N360 treatmentse0
Outcome: Plant 15N recovery ratese0
Direction: greatere0
Comparator: N240 treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0
“Plant 15N recovery rates were greater (i) in the I540 treatments than in the I405 treatments and (ii) in the N360 treatments than in the N240 treatments”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1035

t0
“Cotton growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13

Title

Cotton growth and the fate of N fertilizer as affected by saline water irrigation and N fertigation in a drip-irrigated field

Wei Min; Huijuan Guo; Zhiqiang Hu; et al. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science 2017. doi:10.1080/09064710.2017.1338309

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Cotton biomass, N uptake and yield increased as irrigation amount increased.
Intervention effect Cotton biomass, N uptake and yield increased as N amount increased.
Intervention effect Cotton biomass, N uptake and yield were significantly less with saline water (SW) than with fresh water (FW) and brackish water (BW).
Intervention effect Plant 15N recovery rates were greater in the I540 irrigation treatments than in the I405 treatments.
Intervention effect Plant 15N recovery rates in brackish water (BW) were 7.98% greater than in fresh water (FW).
Intervention effect Plant 15N recovery rates in brackish water (BW) were 30.01% greater than in saline water (SW).
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N increased as N fertilizer amount increased.
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N declined as irrigation amount increased.
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N in brackish water (BW) treatments was 6.02% greater than in fresh water (FW).
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N in saline water (SW) treatments was 21.44% greater than in fresh water (FW).
Intervention effect Total 15N recovery was significantly greater in brackish water (BW) than in fresh water (FW) and saline water (SW).
Intervention effect 15N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in irrigation amount.
Intervention effect 15N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in irrigation water salinity.
Intervention effect 15N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in N rate.
Intervention effect The authors suggest that, with appropriate amounts of irrigation water and N fertilizer, brackish irrigation water (4.61 dS/m) will not affect cotton growth, yield and N recovery.
Intervention effect The authors conclude that saline irrigation water (EC > 8 dS/m) reduces cotton growth, yield and N use efficiency.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis 26D promoted recovery of shoot growth rates after P. infestans infection.

Taxon: potatoSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment: presence of endophytic bacteria B. subtilis 26De0
Interactor: P. infestansPhytophthora infestanse0pathogen
Second interactor: B. subtilis 26De0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: growth rates of shootse0
Direction: recoverye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“It was shown that the presence of endophytic bacteria B. subtilis 26D in potato tissues promoted a rapid recovery of the growth rates of shoots, wet and dry mass of roots after P. infestans infection, and also reduced the area of late blight damaged zones on the leaves.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–561

Title

INFLUENCE OF BACILLUS SUBTILIS 26D ON GROWTH PARAMETERS AND IAA CONTENT IN POTATO PLANTS INFECTED WITH PHYTOPHTHORA INFESTANS

A.V. Sorokan; S.V. Veselova; I.V. Maksimov ÈKOBIOTEH 2021. doi:10.31163/2618-964x-2021-4-2-89-93

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect B. subtilis 26D promoted recovery of wet and dry root mass after infection.
Intervention effect B. subtilis 26D promoted recovery of dry root mass after infection.
Intervention effect B. subtilis 26D reduced the leaf area damaged by late blight.
Intervention effect Pathogen infection increased shoot IAA content.
Intervention effect Infected plants containing B. subtilis 26D did not show the shoot IAA increase.

“rates of recovery growth”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics