View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing salinity substantially decrease d root relative water content .
Treatmentincrease in salinity levels e0 Outcomeroot relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The in crease in salinity levels resulted in a substantial decrease in root relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–481 e1 “Walnut ( J. regia L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–21 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content decrease d nearly 16 percent during dehydration.
Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in relative water content of nearly 16% during dehydration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–359 t0 “Parkinsonia aculeata ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–102 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought treatments significantly decrease d soil water content , leaf water potential, and leaf relative water content .
TreatmentDrought treatments (M2 and M3) e0 Outcomesoil water content, leaf water potential, leaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Macroptilium bracteatum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–74 e0 “Drought treatments (M2 and M3) significantly (P < 0.05) decrease soil water content , leaf water potential, leaf relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–773 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought stress decrease d relative water content by 48%.
Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “DS in itially caused a 48% decrease in relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–826 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf water potential and relative water content fell with drought.
Treatmentdrought stress e0 Outcomeleaf water potential (Ψ) and relative water content e0 Verbatim
t0 “POMEGRANATE SEEDLINGS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 e0 “A gradual decrease in leaf water potential (Ψ) and relative water content was evident with in creasing drought stress levels. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1099 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
High salinity decrease d relative water content and water potential.
Outcomerelative water content and water potential e0 Verbatim
e0 “High salinity led also to a decrease in the relative water content and water potential ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1222 t0 “Calligonum caput-medusae ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–147 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity reduced chickpea chlorophyll content , relative water content and water retention capacity.
Treatmentsalinity stress e0 Outcomechlorophyll content, a decrease in relative water content, a decline in water retention capacity e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “salinity stress which in cluded a reduction in chlorophyll content , a decrease in relative water content , a decline in water retention capacity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1668 e1 “salinity stress on chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–289 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content decrease d continuously in all lettuce head sections.
Organ / stageall sections e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was a continuous decrease in the relative water content (RWC) in all sections. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–469 t0 “butterhead ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–57 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought significantly decrease d maize relative water content .
Treatmentdrought condition e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “drought condition caused a significant decrease in biomass, total chlorophyll, relative water content (RWC) of the plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–983 t0 “Zea mays seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress significantly decrease d relative water content and chlorophyll stability in dex.
Outcomerelative water content, chlorophyll stability index e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Water stress was found to decrease significantly in the data of photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, relative water content , chlorophyll stability in dex ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–820 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.