Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation did not decrease purple nutsedge density.

Taxon: EggplantSolanum melongenat0
Treatment: Fumigatione0
Interactor: purple nutsedgee0weed
Outcome: purple nutsedge densitye0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Eggplant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99

e0
“Fumigation and fomesafen did not decrease purple nutsedge density”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1358

Title

Effect of Fumigation with 1,3-Dichloropropene and Chloropicrin on Fomesafen Dissipation in Eggplant Plasticulture Production

Thomas V. Reed; Nathan S. Boyd; P. Christopher Wilson; et al. Weed Science 2017. doi:10.1017/wsc.2017.64

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Soil fomesafen concentration declined 83% from application to harvest in 2015.
Observation Soil fomesafen concentration declined 96% from application to harvest in 2016.
Intervention effect Fumigation did not affect fomesafen dissipation in either year.
Intervention effect Fomesafen caused 14% eggplant injury two weeks after transplant.
Observation Eggplant injury fell below 5% at six weeks after transplant.
Intervention effect Fomesafen did not reduce eggplant height or yield versus untreated control.
Intervention effect S-metolachlor did not reduce eggplant height or yield versus untreated control.
Intervention effect Fomesafen did not decrease purple nutsedge density.
Intervention effect S-metolachlor reduced purple nutsedge density by 48%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fomesafen did not decrease purple nutsedge density.

Taxon: EggplantSolanum melongenat0
Treatment: fomesafene0
Interactor: purple nutsedgee0weed
Outcome: purple nutsedge densitye0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Eggplant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99

e0
“Fumigation and fomesafen did not decrease purple nutsedge density”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1358

Title

Effect of Fumigation with 1,3-Dichloropropene and Chloropicrin on Fomesafen Dissipation in Eggplant Plasticulture Production

Thomas V. Reed; Nathan S. Boyd; P. Christopher Wilson; et al. Weed Science 2017. doi:10.1017/wsc.2017.64

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Soil fomesafen concentration declined 83% from application to harvest in 2015.
Observation Soil fomesafen concentration declined 96% from application to harvest in 2016.
Intervention effect Fumigation did not affect fomesafen dissipation in either year.
Intervention effect Fomesafen caused 14% eggplant injury two weeks after transplant.
Observation Eggplant injury fell below 5% at six weeks after transplant.
Intervention effect Fomesafen did not reduce eggplant height or yield versus untreated control.
Intervention effect S-metolachlor did not reduce eggplant height or yield versus untreated control.
Intervention effect Fumigation did not decrease purple nutsedge density.
Intervention effect S-metolachlor reduced purple nutsedge density by 48%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing orchard density did not significantly decrease yield.

Taxon: SOUR CHERRYPrunus cerasust0
Treatment: increasing the densitye0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: does not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“SOUR CHERRY”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91

e0
“increasing the density in the orchard, the yield does not decrease significantly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1858–1938

Title

THE EFFECT OF ROOTSTOCK AND SPACING ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF 'KÁNTORJÁNOSI 3' SOUR CHERRY VARIETY IN INTENSIVE ORCHARD

L. Magyar; K. Hrotkó Acta Horticulturae 2013. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2013.981.58

Other claims from this paper (13)

Observation Slender spindle crowns were applicable on medium and strong rootstocks across spacings.
Recommendation The authors recommend large spacing with vigorous Prunus mahaleb rootstocks under extensive conditions.
Observation Magyar was suitable under extensive conditions at reduced spacing.
Observation Prob lacked sufficient vigour for the applied spacing and slender spindle training.
Observation Prob produced one of the best fruit sizes.
Recommendation The authors do not recommend Colt for Kantorjanosi 3.
Recommendation The authors do not recommend Pi-Ku 2 for Kantorjanosi 3.
Observation Branches died and leaves yellowed on Pi-Ku 2.
Observation CEMA gave better yield.
Observation Korponay gave better yield.
Observation Magyar was suitable at higher tree density.
Intervention effect Larger spacing significantly increased yield.
Intervention effect Specific yield index did not differ significantly across spacings.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient density unit under ORD did not decrease significantly.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Outcome: nutrient density unit (NDU)e0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“its nutrient density unit (NDU) did not decrease significantly due to the additional duck yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–635

t0
“rice–duck coculture”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112

Title

Transforming agrifood systems in a win–win for health and environment: evidence from organic rice–duck coculture

Hui Gao; Linxiu Dai; Qiang Xu; et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2022. doi:10.1002/jsfa.12282

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observation Rice yield under ORD was slightly lower than CR.
Observation ORD carbon footprint per NDU was 24.3% lower than OR.
Observation ORD carbon footprint per NDU was 5.8% higher than CR, without statistical significance.
Observation ORD carbon footprint per economic profit was reduced by 47.1-75.7% versus the other farming modes.
Observation ORD net ecosystem economic budget increased by 98.5-341.9%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At low versus high sowing density, grain yield in modern wheat cultivars did not decrease significantly.

Taxon: common wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: modern cultivarse0
Treatment: low sowing densitye0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: did not decreasee0
Comparator: high sowing densitye0

Verbatim

e0
“Compared to high sowing density, in modern cultivars grain yield did not decrease significantly with low sowing density”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1024

t0
“common wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85

Title

Grain yield and competitive ability against weeds in modern and heritage common wheat cultivars are differently influenced by sowing density

Mariateresa Lazzaro; Ambrogio Costanzo; Dalia Hosam Farag; et al. Italian Journal of Agronomy 2017. doi:10.4081/ija.2017.901

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Single cultivars and mixtures did not differ significantly in grain yield and weed suppression.
Intervention effect At low versus high sowing density, grain yield increased 15.6% in heritage wheat cultivars.
Intervention effect Plant lodging in heritage wheat cultivars was 21.5% lower at low sowing density.
Intervention effect Weed biomass increased at low sowing density in heritage wheat crop stands.
Intervention effect Weed biomass increased at low sowing density in modern wheat crop stands.
Association Heritage wheat crop stands had 56% lower weed biomass on average than modern stands.
Association At low sowing density, heritage wheat stands had weed biomass of 6.82±1.50 g m–2, lower than modern stands.
Recommendation The authors advise lower sowing density for heritage wheat crop stands to retain productivity, reduce lodging and control weeds.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pubescence density did not consistently increase or decrease between anthesis and shuckoff.

Taxon: Prunus persicaPrunus persicae0
Outcome: Pubescence densitye2
Direction: no_changeinferrede2
Qualifier: between anthesis and shuckoffe2

Verbatim

e0
“peach [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch. cv. June Gold]”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–100

e2
“Pubescence density did not consistently increase or decrease between anthesis and shuckoff, but did show a major decrease on ripe fruit”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–459

Title

Changes in Trichome Length and Density during Growth of Peach Fruits1

John T. Atwood; Calvin E. Arnold HortScience 1982. doi:10.21273/hortsci.17.2.228

Other claims from this paper (4)

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leafhopper abundance did not decrease with greater trichome density.

Taxon: potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
Organ / stage: trichomee0
Interactor: leafhoppere0pest
Outcome: leafhopper abundancee0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“leafhopper abundance did not decrease as trichome density increased”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1169

t0
“on potato. Natural variation in trichome density among 17 potato cultivars”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–751

Title

The costs of anti‐herbivore defense traits in agricultural crop plants: a case study involving leafhoppers and trichomes

Ian Kaplan; Galen P. Dively; Robert F. Denno Ecological Applications 2009. doi:10.1890/07-1566.1

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity did not decrease stomatal density in barley.

Taxon: barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Outcome: stomatal densitye0
Direction: note0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0
“decreased stomatal density in tomato, but not in barley.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–849

Title

Different abscisic acid‐deficient mutants show unique morphological and hydraulic responses to high air humidity

Sheona N. Innes; Knut Asbjørn Solhaug; Sissel Torre; et al. Physiologia Plantarum 2021. doi:10.1111/ppl.13417

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Growth humidity did not affect foliar ABA levels in tomato or barley.
Observation The flacca mutant had larger and more abundant stomata than wild type tomato.
Intervention effect High humidity increased stomatal size in tomato.
Intervention effect High humidity decreased stomatal size in barley.
Intervention effect High humidity decreased stomatal density in tomato.
Observation ABA-deficient Az34 barley had lower photosynthesis.
Intervention effect ABA deficiency decreased relative shoot growth rate in tomato and barley.
Intervention effect High humidity increased leaf water status in tomato.
Intervention effect High humidity increased shoot relative growth rate in flacca tomato.
Intervention effect High humidity did not affect shoot growth rate in barley.
Association The ABA and humidity interaction affected leaf development in tomato only.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Appressed membrane particle density did not decrease at 1°C.

Taxon: pumpkint0
Outcome: density of particles on the appressed exoplasmic fracture facee0
Direction: no decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“no decrease in the density of particles on the appressed exoplasmic fracture face”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–738

t0
“Attached leaves of pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L. cv. Jattiläismeloni)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–66

Title

Temperature‐dependent changes in Photosystem II heterogeneity of attached leaves under high light

Eva‐Mari Aro; Esa Tyystjärvi; Arja Nurmi Physiologia Plantarum 1990. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1990.tb00029.x

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Low temperature accelerated PSII photoinhibition.
Intervention effect At low temperature, alpha centers declined under high light.
Observation Functional beta centers remained constant at low temperature.
Intervention effect Strong light induced less photoinhibition at room temperature.
Observation Alpha centers decreased during the first 30 minutes of high light at room temperature.
Observation PSII beta centers increased significantly at room temperature.
Mechanism The beta-center increase was attributed to migration of phosphorylated light-harvesting complex.
Observation Functional beta centers then rapidly decreased.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity did not decrease stomatal density.

Taxon: Rhizophora mangleRhizophora manglet0
Outcome: stomatal densitye0
Direction: did not decreasee0
Setting: intermediate salinity sitee0

Verbatim

e0
“increasing salinities did not decrease stomatal density (intermediate salinity site: 73.4 stomata.mm2 SD= 13.5; high salinity site: 74.8 stomata.mm2 SD= 17.3)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2232–2390

t0
“Rhizophora mangle”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–73

Title

Stomatal density, leaf area and plant size variation of Rhizophora mangle (Malpighiales: Rhizophoraceae) along a salinity gradient in the Mexican Caribbean

Joanne R. Peel; Maria C. Mandujano Sanchez; Jorge Lopez Portillo; et al. Revista de Biología Tropical 2017. doi:10.15517/rbt.v65i2.24372

Other claims from this paper (7)

Association Plants were smaller at the higher salinity site.
Observation Largest leaves occurred at the low salinity site, measuring 51.2 ± 24.99 cm2.
Association Leaf length was not correlated with tree height.
Association Leaf length was not correlated with trunk diameter.
Association Larger leaves at low salinity had lower stomatal density of 65.0 stomata.mm2.
Association Stomatal density was inversely related to leaf area (r= -0.29, P < 0.001).
Association Stomatal density was inversely related to leaf width (r= -0.31, P < 0.001).

“decrease in density”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics