View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Water productivity at field capacity and 75% field capacity was close.
water productivity e6 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Pepper Plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 e6 “water productivity for FC and 75%FC were closely ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–959 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Growth and yield at 75% field capacity were the same as under 100 % field capacity .
Plant growth and yield e0 75% field capacity of soil water e0 optimum conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “Plant growth and yield at 75% field capacity of soil water was the same as that of plants grown under optimum conditions (100 % field capacity of soil water) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1149 t0 “Chili Pepper ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–43 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
All varieties had similar yields near field capacity .
at or near to field capacity e0 Verbatim
e0 “on plots kept at or near to field capacity all varieties gave similar yields ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–332 t0 “potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–29 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil moisture at field capacity (W4) and at 90% of field capacity (W3) did not differ significantly in soybean yield and water use efficiency.
90% of field capacity (W 3) e3 yield and water use efficiency (WUE) e3 no_change inferred e3 soil moisture content at field capacity (W 4) e3 Verbatim
t0 “Water Use Efficiency, Yield and Crop Coefficient (Kc) of Soybean under Different Water Regimes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 e3 “excepting of soil moisture content at field capacity (W 4) and 90% of field capacity (W 3) on yield and water use efficiency (WUE) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–592 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
At field capacity , accessions did not differ in biochemical parameters.
biochemical parameters e0 did not differ e0 field capacity e0 Verbatim
e0 “Under field capacity , accessions did not differ for biochemical parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–520 t0 “black pepper ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–37 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Electromagnetic field did not affect germination energy or capacity .
variable electromagnetic field e0 germination energy and capacity e0 absence of influence e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “absence of influence of variable electromagnetic field on germination energy and capacity of cannabis seeds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–635 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf Vincristine content at 100% field capacity did not significantly differ from that at 75% field capacity (84.69 mcg per g).
Catharanthus Roseus (L.) G. Don e0 (100%) field capacity e6 leaf content of Vincristine e6 did not significantly e7 (75%) field capacity e7 Verbatim
e6 “level of (100%) field capacity , outperformed the leaf content of Vincristine, which recorded (86.15) mcg. −1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1276 e7 “which did not significantly -differentiate with the water tension treatment A2 at a level (75%) field capacity , which recorded (84.69) mcg. −1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1421 e0 “on Catharanthus Roseus (L.) G. Don plant variety Pacifica X P Mix ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–255 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf water potential did not vary under field capacity .
field capacity e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was no variation in Ψw during the evaluated period for plants in field capacity . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–964 e1 “Coffee (Coffea arabica ) plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation with 75% or more of field capacity did not promote grass mortality.
Irrigations with 75% or more of field capacity e0 do not promote e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Irrigations with 75% or more of field capacity do not promote grass mortality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1521 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
IPR Tuiuiu seed vigor was similar at soil field capacity .
soil field capacity e0 Verbatim
e0 “The plants of genotype IPR Tuiuiu showed higher growth and similar expression of seed vigor under soil field capacity . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–685 e1 “common bean genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–248 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Capsicum
Solanum tuberosum
Glycine max
Cannabis
Coffea
Phaseolus vulgaris