View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Agronomic , physiological and recovery efficiency declined as N application increased.
Treatmentincrease amount of N applied e0 OutcomeAgronomic efficiency,physiological efficiency and recovery efficiency e0 Verbatim
e0 “Agronomic efficiency , physiological efficiency and recovery efficiency decreased with the increase amount of N applied. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–681 t0 “Oat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–60 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Fertilization through drip improved agronomic efficiency , physiological efficiency and apparent recovery considerably more than furrow irrigation in sugarcane.
TreatmentFertilization through drip e0 Outcomeagronomic efficiency, physiological efficiency, and apparent recovery e0 Comparatorfurrow irrigation e0 Verbatim
t0 “sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–38 e0 “Fertilization through drip improved agronomic efficiency , physiological efficiency , and apparent recovery considerably more than furrow irrigation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1047 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
FYM had higher physiological , agronomic , and recovery efficiency .
Outcomephysiological, agronomic and recovery efficiency e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 e0 “nitrogen use efficiency indicators i.e., physiological , agronomic and recovery efficiency were higher un- der FYM treated plots. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1888–2016 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect Urea at recommended nitrogen dose produced maximum wheat yield of 4.63 t/ha, significantly above other treatments. Intervention effect FYM at 125% of RDN produced maximum organic-source wheat yield of 3.65 t/ha. Intervention effect FYM at 125% of RDN had wheat yield at par with vermicompost at the same rate. Intervention effect FYM at 125% of RDN had wheat yield at par with neemax at the same rate. Intervention effect FYM at 125% of RDN yielded significantly more wheat than FYM at 50%. Intervention effect Urea significantly increased emergence, height, and dry matter relative to other nitrogen sources. Intervention effect Urea significantly increased wheat spikes, grains per spike, and thousand-grain weight relative to other sources. Intervention effect At 125% RDN, FYM increased the listed morphology and yield components over its 50% dose. Intervention effect At 125% RDN, vermicompost increased the listed morphology and yield components over its 50% dose. Intervention effect At 125% RDN, neemax increased the listed morphology and yield components over its 50% dose. Intervention effect Urea exceeded organic sources for wheat protein content, protein yield, and nitrogen uptake. Intervention effect Urea exceeded organic sources for nitrogen use efficiency indicators. Intervention effect Vermicompost maximized protein content, protein yield, and nitrogen harvest index among organic sources. Observation Organic treatments other than 50% RDN neemax and 50% RDN vermicompost were judged promising. Observation All nitrogen treatments except control maintained a positive soil nitrogen balance. Observation High procurement cost of FYM and vermicompost caused negative net returns for these treatments. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Organic manures increased crop recovery , physiological and agronomic efficiency .
Treatmentorganic manures e0 Outcomecrop recovery efficiency, physiological efficiency, agronomic efficiency e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Higher crop recovery efficiency , physiological efficiency , agronomic efficiency and partial factor productivity were higher with inclusion of organic manures ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1583 t0 “rainfed sorghum ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 105–120 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Xiaoyan 22 exceeded other varieties in nitrogen recovery , agronomic efficiency and physiological efficiency .
OutcomeN recovery,N agronomic efficiency and N physiological efficiency e0 Comparatorother varieties e0 Verbatim
e0 “Compared to other varieties,Xiaoyan 22 had higher N recovery ,N agronomic efficiency and N physiological efficiency . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1621 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Recovery efficiency , physiological efficiency and agronomic efficiency had optimum values in both seasons.
Outcomerecovery ef- ficiency, physiological efficiency, agronomic efficiency e4 SettingAduthurai, Tamil Nadu e2 Verbatim
e1 “nutrient-use efficiency of rice (Oryza sativa L.) field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–275 e2 “at Aduthurai, Tamil Nadu ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–138 e4 “The optimum values of recovery ef- ficiency, physiological efficiency , agronomic efficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–634 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient levels influenced maize physiological , recovery , and agronomic efficiency .
Treatmentnutrient levels e0 Outcomephysiological efficiency, recovery efficiency, and agronomic efficiency e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Partial factor productivity, partial nutrient budget, internal efficiency , physiological efficiency, recovery efficiency , and agronomic efficiency of NPK for hybrid maize were mostly influenced by nutrient levels. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–908 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient levels statistically influenced recovery efficiency , agronomic efficiency and physiological efficiency of NPK in wheat.
TreatmentNutrient levels e7 Outcomerecovery efficiency, agronomic efficiency, and physiological efficiency e7 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Nutrient use efficiency (NUE) of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 e7 “Nutrient levels influenced statistically partial factor productivity, internal efficiency , partial nutrient budget, recovery efficiency , agronomic efficiency , and physiological efficiency of NPK for wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1081 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Target yield nitrogen management gave significantly higher agronomic efficiency , apparent recovery and physiological efficiency .
TreatmentTarget yield based N management e0 Outcomeagronomic efficiency, apparent recovery and physiological efficiency e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Target yield based N management resulted significantly higher agronomic efficiency , apparent recovery and physiological efficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1680 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Agronomic , apparent recovery , and physiological efficiency did not differ significantly among N100, N200, and N250.
Outcomeagronomic efficiency, apparent recovery efficiency, and physiological efficiency e0 ComparatorN200, and N250 treatments e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “insignificant differences in agronomic efficiency , apparent recovery efficiency , and physiological efficiency were observed between N100, N200, and N250 treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1004 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.