Search claims · PlantClaims

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat leaf water content decreased in winter relative to summer.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome: leaf water contente0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: summere0
Setting: wintere0

Verbatim

e0
“An increase in excised-leaf water retention capability and a decrease in leaf water content were seen during winter compared to summer.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–332

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73

Title

Genetical variability of excised-leaf water retention capability in wheat.

Gnanasiri S. PREMACHANDRA; Tohru SHIMADA Japanese Journal of Crop Science 1988. doi:10.1626/jcs.57.220

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased wheat relative water content by 35.57%.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: stressed conditionse0
Outcome: relative water contente0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 35.57%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“In the present study with 92 genotypes, a decrease of 35.57% for relative water content and 23.08% was observed for chlorophyll content in the stressed conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1124

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–58

Title

Physiological and biochemical responses of hexaploid wheat cultivars to drought stress

Sunbal Khalil Chaudhari Pure and Applied Biology 2016. doi:10.19045/bspab.2016.50167

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Drought decreased wheat chlorophyll content by 23.08%.
Intervention effect Moisture stress increased wheat sugar by 28.86%.
Intervention effect Moisture stress increased wheat SOD by 4.53%.
Intervention effect Moisture stress increased wheat canopy temperature by 20.38%.
Observation Genotypes useful for breeding were identified.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging caused wheat relative water content of flag leaf to decrease.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: waterlogginge0
Outcome: relative water content of flag leafe0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Results showed waterlogging made the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf increase, made the root vigor, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content of flag leaf decrease, the content of organic matter change obviously, and then the yield per plant declined.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–516

t0
“Changes of Physiological Characters of Wheat After Water logging at Booting and Relations Between Physiological Characters and Waterlogging Tolerance”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–149

Title

Changes of Physiological Characters of Wheat After Water logging at Booting and Relations Between Physiological Characters and Waterlogging Tolerance

Guangsheng Zhou 中国农业科学(英文版) 2002

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Waterlogging caused wheat content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf to increase.
Intervention effect Waterlogging caused wheat root vigor to decrease.
Intervention effect Waterlogging caused wheat content of chlorophyll to decrease.
Intervention effect Waterlogging caused wheat net photosynthesis rate to decrease.
Intervention effect Waterlogging caused wheat nitrate reductase activity to decrease.
Intervention effect Waterlogging caused wheat content of organic matter to change obviously.
Intervention effect Waterlogging caused wheat yield per plant to declined.
Association Several physiological traits were significantly correlated with wheat waterlogging tolerance.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased wheat relative water content in flag leaf.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: waterlogginge0
Outcome: relative water content in flag leafe0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the waterlogging made the root vigor decrease, the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf increase, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content in flag leaf decrease, the content of organic matter change obviously”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–499

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44

Title

Changes of Physiological Characters of Wheat After Waterlogging and Relations Between Physiological Characters and Waterlogging Tolerance of Different Varieties

Zhou Guang 2002

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat root vigor.
Intervention effect Waterlogging increased wheat content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat content of chlorophyll.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat net photosynthesis rate.
Intervention effect Waterlogging decreased wheat nitrate reductase activity.
Intervention effect Waterlogging changed wheat content of organic matter.
Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced wheat grains per plant.
Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced wheat 1 000 grains weight.
Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced wheat yield per plant.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with water conservation ability of flag leaf.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with content of free amino acids in secondary root.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with content of starch in secondary root at booting stage.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated highly significantly with percentage of stem yield in yield per plant at ripening stage.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with relative water content in flag leaf.
Association Wheat waterlogging tolerance correlated significantly with content of free amino acids in leaves.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water limitation decreased wheat grain yield, photosynthetic pigments, photosystem II efficiency and relative water content.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: water limitatione0
Outcome: grain yield, photosynthetic pigments, efficiency of photosystem II, and relative water contente0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“water limitation led to a decrease in the grain yield, photosynthetic pigments, efficiency of photosystem II, and relative water content”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–695

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99

Title

Effects of Biofertilizers and Nano Zinc-Iron Oxide on Yield and Physicochemical Properties of Wheat under Water Deficit Conditions

Raouf Seyed Sharifi; Razieh Khalilzadeh; Alireza Pirzad; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2020. doi:10.1080/00103624.2020.1845350

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Water limitation increased proline, soluble sugars and catalase, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activities.
Intervention effect Biofertilizer application increased proline, soluble sugars and enzyme activities.
Intervention effect Nanooxide application increased proline, soluble sugars and enzyme activities.
Intervention effect Zn-Fe oxide nanoparticles lowered electrical conductivity by 17% under severe water limitation.
Intervention effect Zn-Fe oxide nanoparticles increased peroxidase activity by 27% under severe water limitation.
Intervention effect Zn-Fe oxide nanoparticles increased polyphenol oxidase by 61% under severe water limitation.
Intervention effect Azotobacter with nano Zn-Fe oxide increased grain yield by 88% compared with control under severe water limitation.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water and nitrogen stress noticeably decreased leaf water potential, osmotic potential and relative water content of wheat.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: water and nitrogen stresse2
Outcome: leaf water potential, osmotic potential and relative water contente2
Direction: noticeable decreasee2

Verbatim

e0
“to evaluate the gas exchange, water relations, and water use efficiency (WUE) of wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–134

e2
“The exposure of plants to water and nitrogen stress lead to noticeable decrease in leaf water potential, osmotic potential and relative water content”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1154

Title

WATER STRESS AND NITROGEN MANAGEMENT EFFECTS ON GAS EXCHANGE, WATER RELATIONS, AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY IN WHEAT

Ejaz Ahmad Waraich; R. Ahmad; Saifullah; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2011. doi:10.1080/01904167.2011.600413

Other claims from this paper (9)

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative water content and membrane stability index decreased as salt stress levels increased in wheat.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: stress levelse3
Outcome: relative water content and membrane stability indexe3
Direction: decreasee3

Verbatim

t0
“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars growing under salt stress”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–122

e3
“relative water content and membrane stability index decrease the value as well as they increases the stress levels”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1089

Title

Antioxidant activity of enzymatic system of two different wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars growing under salt stress

W.M. Bhutta Plant Soil and Environment 2011. doi:10.17221/95/2010-pse

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe stress decreased relative water content in Al-gaimi.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: Al-gaimie0
Treatment: severe stresse0
Outcome: RWCe0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Al-gaimi and Hab-Ahmar showed a decrease in RWC under the severe stress.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1109

t0
“wheat cultivars”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–87

Title

Effect of water stress on growth and water use efficiency (WUE) of some wheat cultivars (Triticum durum) grown in Saudi Arabia.

Tahar Boutraa; Abdellah Akhkha; Abdulkhaliq A. Al-Shoaibi; et al. Journal of Taibah University for Science 2010. doi:10.1016/s1658-3655(12)60019-3

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Mild water deficit affected Sindy-2 growth.
Intervention effect Mild water deficit affected Hab-Ahmar growth.
Intervention effect Al-gaimi root dry weight did not decrease under mild deficit.
Intervention effect Al-gaimi dry weight did not change under mild deficit.
Intervention effect Severe stress decreased Hab-Ahmar growth most.
Intervention effect Severe stress decreased Sindy-2 growth less than Hab-Ahmar.
Intervention effect Severe stress decreased Sindy- 1 growth less than Sindy-2.
Intervention effect Severe stress did not affect Al-gaimi growth.
Intervention effect Severe stress decreased relative water content in Hab-Ahmar.
Intervention effect Water stress did not change RWC in Sindy-1.
Intervention effect Water stress did not change RWC in Sindy-2.
Intervention effect Severe deficit decreased WUE in Hab-Ahmar.
Intervention effect Severe deficit decreased WUE in Sindy-2.
Intervention effect Severe deficit did not affect WUE in Sindy-1.
Intervention effect Severe deficit did not affect WUE in Al- gaimi.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe stress decreased relative water content in Hab-Ahmar.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: Hab-Ahmare0
Treatment: severe stresse0
Outcome: RWCe0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Al-gaimi and Hab-Ahmar showed a decrease in RWC under the severe stress.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1109

t0
“wheat cultivars”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–87

Title

Effect of water stress on growth and water use efficiency (WUE) of some wheat cultivars (Triticum durum) grown in Saudi Arabia.

Tahar Boutraa; Abdellah Akhkha; Abdulkhaliq A. Al-Shoaibi; et al. Journal of Taibah University for Science 2010. doi:10.1016/s1658-3655(12)60019-3

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Mild water deficit affected Sindy-2 growth.
Intervention effect Mild water deficit affected Hab-Ahmar growth.
Intervention effect Al-gaimi root dry weight did not decrease under mild deficit.
Intervention effect Al-gaimi dry weight did not change under mild deficit.
Intervention effect Severe stress decreased Hab-Ahmar growth most.
Intervention effect Severe stress decreased Sindy-2 growth less than Hab-Ahmar.
Intervention effect Severe stress decreased Sindy- 1 growth less than Sindy-2.
Intervention effect Severe stress did not affect Al-gaimi growth.
Intervention effect Severe stress decreased relative water content in Al-gaimi.
Intervention effect Water stress did not change RWC in Sindy-1.
Intervention effect Water stress did not change RWC in Sindy-2.
Intervention effect Severe deficit decreased WUE in Hab-Ahmar.
Intervention effect Severe deficit decreased WUE in Sindy-2.
Intervention effect Severe deficit did not affect WUE in Sindy-1.
Intervention effect Severe deficit did not affect WUE in Al- gaimi.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower leaf water content decreased CO2 fixation in wheat cultivars.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: Decrease in relative water content (RWC)e0
Outcome: net photosynthetic CO2 fixation (A)e0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“Decrease in relative water content (RWC) of leaves resulted in fast and considerable stomatal closure and decrease in net photosynthetic CO2 fixation (A) in Ae. bicornis and in wheat cultivars”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–387

Title

Effects of drought on photosynthetic parameters and heat stability of PSII in wheat and in Aegilops species originating from dry habitats

Sándor Dulai Acta Biologica Szegediensis 2006

Other claims from this paper (14)

Association Lower leaf water content caused rapid stomatal closure in Ae. bicornis.
Association Lower leaf water content decreased CO2 fixation in Ae. bicornis.
Association Lower leaf water content caused rapid stomatal closure in wheat cultivars.
Observation Ae. tauschii retained relatively high stomatal conductance and CO2 fixation at 90–70% RWC.
Observation Ae. speltoides retained relatively high stomatal conductance and CO2 fixation at 90–70% RWC.
Mechanism CO2 diffusion limited photosynthesis even at lower RWC in Ae. taushii.
Mechanism CO2 diffusion limited photosynthesis even at lower RWC in Ae. speltoides.
Observation Ae. bicornis showed significant mesophyll limitation.
Observation Wheat showed significant mesophyll limitation.
Intervention effect Drought significantly increased PSII thermal stability in wheat.
Intervention effect Drought significantly increased PSII thermal stability in Aegilops.
Observation Some Ae. taushii genotypes had better drought tolerance and satisfactory heat stability than wheat.
Observation Some Ae. speltoides genotypes had better drought tolerance and satisfactory heat stability than wheat.
Recommendation The authors suggest Ae. taushii and Ae. speltoides for improving wheat heat tolerance in dry, hot field periods.

“decrease in relative water content”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics