View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
A portable video camera estimated leaf chlorophyll content with sufficient practical accuracy.
Outcomechlorophyll content of leaves e0 Directionsufficient accuracy e0 Valuesufficient accuracy e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “the chlorophyll content of leaves can be estimated with sufficient accuracy using a portable video camera ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–995 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf chlorophyll content estimated from Hyperion data reached R 2 = 0.5735.
QualifierLeaf chlorophyll content e2 Verbatim
e0 “the accurate estimation of the forest canopy chlorophyll content is a significant foundation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–222 e2 “Leaf chlorophyll content was estimated with R 2 = 0.5735, RMSE = 7.3574 ¿g/cm 2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1542 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf chlorophyll content estimated from Hyperion data had an RMSE of 7.3574 ¿g/cm 2.
QualifierLeaf chlorophyll content e2 Verbatim
e0 “the accurate estimation of the forest canopy chlorophyll content is a significant foundation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–222 e2 “Leaf chlorophyll content was estimated with R 2 = 0.5735, RMSE = 7.3574 ¿g/cm 2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1542 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The neural network estimated lettuce leaf chlorophyll content with reasonable accuracy.
Outcomelettuce leaf chlorophyll content e0 Qualifierreasonable accuracy e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “the MLPNN model was capable of estimating the lettuce leaf chlorophyll content with a reasonable accuracy ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–905 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Epifluorescence estimated relative chlorophyll content through spinach leaf tissues, and the leaf cross-section fluorescence profile corresponded to chlorophyll content measured in leaf paradermal extracts.
Organ / stageleaf tissues e1 Outcomerelative chlorophyll content e1 Comparatorchlorophyll content measured in extracts of leaf paradermal sections e2 Verbatim
t0 “Profiles of light absorption and chlorophyll within spinach leaves from chlorophyll fluorescence ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 e1 “Thus epifluorescence was used to estimate relative chlorophyll content through leaf tissues ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–794 e2 “corresponded to chlorophyll content measured in extracts of leaf paradermal sections ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–701 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
VOE reduced estimated leaf chlorophyll content the most, by 11% overall for 23 days after treatment.
Outcomeestimated leaf chlorophyll content e0 Qualifierfor 23 days after treatment e0 Comparatoruntreated control e1 Verbatim
e0 “VOE reduced estimated leaf chlorophyll content the greatest, suppressing overall levels by 11% for 23 days after treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1005 e1 “an untreated control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–459 t0 “Sweet Cherry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 Other claims from this paper (14) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Chlorophyll -based empirical formulas estimated maize leaf nitrogen content more accurately than leaf -protein formulas.
Directionmore accurately e0 Comparatorthose based on leaf protein content e0 Verbatim
e0 “the Chlorophyll (Chl)-based empirical formulas estimated maize LNC more accurately than those based on leaf protein content . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1636 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Overall leaf nitrogen was positively correlated with estimated chlorophyll content , especially in the top of trembling aspen trees.
Outcomeestimated chlorophyll content e0 Qualifierespecially in the top part of the trees e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was a positive correlation between overall leaf N and estimated chlorophyll content , especially in the top part of the trees. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–834 e1 “in trembling aspen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–352 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Estimated chlorophyll content progressively decreased as disease spread.
Outcomechlorophyll content e0 Directionprogressively decreased e0 Verbatim
e0 “the chlorophyll content progressively decreased as the disease spreads ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–855 t0 “leaf ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–122 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
PROSAIL under- estimated leaf chlorophyll content , with a weakly significant trend.
Outcomeleaf chlorophyll content e2 Directionunder-estimate e2 Qualifierweakly significant trend e2 Verbatim
e1 “leaf chlorophyll content of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–428 e2 “There was a weakly significant trend for the PROSAIL model to over-estimate LAI and under-estimate leaf chlorophyll content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–838 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.