Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Compost tea and H2O2 had no significant peroxidase increase.

A claim from CHEMICAL INDUCTION OF SYSTEMIC AQUARID RESISTANCE AND EFFECT OF THEIR APPLICATION TIME ON RICE BLAST “MAGNAPORTHE GRISEA” INFECTION TO CULTIVARS SAKHA101 AND SAKHA104. · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost tea and H2O2 had no significant peroxidase increase.

Treatment
Compost Tea and H2O2e0
Outcome
PO activitye0
Direction
no significant increasee0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compost Tea and H2O2 showed no significant increase in PO activity with all time intervals while the other treatments showed PO activities only in 10-20 min. compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2934–3112
t0

“rice blast”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 90–100

Title

CHEMICAL INDUCTION OF SYSTEMIC AQUARID RESISTANCE AND EFFECT OF THEIR APPLICATION TIME ON RICE BLAST “MAGNAPORTHE GRISEA” INFECTION TO CULTIVARS SAKHA101 AND SAKHA104.

Rabab Elamawi; R. El -Shafey; A. Emeran; et al. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology /Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology 2013. doi:10.21608/jppp.2013.87274

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-102907cb48fee2b69b1303ee1593746bb73e83e6163caf8456464e005f5faa9e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 16 in the model’s answer

hydrogen peroxide · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
  8. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.