Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

Biochar Increases Rice Yield in Soda Saline-Alkali Paddy Fields by Improving Saline-Alkali Stress and Phosphorus Use Efficiency

Xuebin Li; Weikang Che; Junlong Piao; et al.

15
claims
39
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soda saline-alkali significantly hinders rice growth, phosphorus utilization efficiency, and yield formation. The application of biochar can alleviate the adverse effects of saline-alkali stress on crops. However, there is limited research on the interaction between biochar and phosphorus fertilizer concerning ionic accumulation, phosphorus utilization efficiency, and rice yield in soda saline-alkali soils. A two-year field experiment was conducted to study the combined effects of biochar and phosphate fertilizer on ionic accumulation, physiological status, phosphorus utilization efficiency, and rice yield in soda saline-alkali soil. Four treatments were established for the study: NK (225 kg N, 75 kg K ha−1 year−1), NPK (225 kg N, 70 kg P, 75 kg K ha−1 year−1), NK + B [225 kg N, 75 kg K ha−1 year−1, 1.5% biochar (w/w)], and NPK + B [225 kg N, 70 kg P, 75 kg K ha−1 year−1, 1.5% biochar (w/w)]. The findings indicated that the combined application of biochar and phosphorus fertilizer (NPK + B) significantly reduced the Na+ concentration, Na+/K+ ratio, malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide anion (O2−), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) levels in rice plants. Furthermore, it resulted in a significant increase in K+ concentration and elevated the levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), proline (Pro), soluble protein (SP), soluble sugar (SS), and acid phosphatase (ACP). The NPK + B treatment exhibited a significant difference compared to the other treatments (p < 0.05). Compared with NK, phosphorus accumulation and phosphorus utilization efficiency under NPK + B were significantly increased (p < 0.05). The average of biomass yield, grain yield, and harvest index of NPK + B, NK + B, and NPK significantly surpassed those of NK by 6.28–12.25%, 19.80–42.13%, and 11.59–24.64%, respectively. Moreover, a significant difference was observed between NPK + B and the other treatments (p < 0.05). Principal component analysis of the two-year mean data revealed a strong positive correlation of 89.5% for PC1 and a minor negative correlation of 4.4% for PC2. Our research findings demonstrate that the combination of biochar and phosphorus fertilizer effectively enhances salt and alkali tolerance in rice plants, resulting in increased yield through improved ionic balance and physiological status.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus biochar reduced rice Na concentration and Na to K ratio.

Treatment
NPK + Be0
Outcome
Na+ concentration, Na+/K+ ratioe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
other treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combined application of biochar and phosphorus fertilizer (NPK + B) significantly reduced the Na+ concentration, Na+/K+ ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1063 · show in text ↑
e1

“levels in rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1162 · show in text ↑
e2

“exhibited a significant difference compared to the other treatments (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus biochar reduced MDA, superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide levels.

Treatment
NPK + Be1
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide anion (O2−), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) levelse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
other treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly reduced the Na+ concentration, Na+/K+ ratio, malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide anion (O2−), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) levels in rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1162 · show in text ↑
e1

“(NPK + B)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1005 · show in text ↑
e2

“exhibited a significant difference compared to the other treatments (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus biochar increased rice K concentration.

Treatment
NPK + Be2
Outcome
K+ concentratione0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
other treatmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it resulted in a significant increase in K+ concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1234 · show in text ↑
e1

“levels in rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1162 · show in text ↑
e2

“phosphorus fertilizer (NPK + B)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1005 · show in text ↑
e3

“exhibited a significant difference compared to the other treatments (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus biochar raised SOD, POD and CAT levels.

Treatment
NPK + Be2
Outcome
levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT)e0
Direction
elevatede0
Comparator
other treatmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated the levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1322 · show in text ↑
e1

“levels in rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1162 · show in text ↑
e2

“phosphorus fertilizer (NPK + B)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1005 · show in text ↑
e3

“exhibited a significant difference compared to the other treatments (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus biochar raised APX, proline and soluble protein levels.

Treatment
NPK + Be2
Outcome
ascorbate peroxidase (APX), proline (Pro), soluble protein (SP)e0
Direction
elevatede0
Comparator
other treatmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated the levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), proline (Pro), soluble protein (SP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1387 · show in text ↑
e1

“levels in rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1162 · show in text ↑
e2

“phosphorus fertilizer (NPK + B)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1005 · show in text ↑
e3

“exhibited a significant difference compared to the other treatments (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus biochar raised soluble sugar and acid phosphatase levels.

Treatment
NPK + Be2
Outcome
soluble sugar (SS), and acid phosphatase (ACP)e0
Direction
elevatede0
Comparator
other treatmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated the levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), proline (Pro), soluble protein (SP), soluble sugar (SS), and acid phosphatase (ACP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1435 · show in text ↑
e1

“levels in rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1162 · show in text ↑
e2

“phosphorus fertilizer (NPK + B)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1005 · show in text ↑
e3

“exhibited a significant difference compared to the other treatments (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus biochar increased phosphorus accumulation over NK.

Treatment
NPK + Be0
Outcome
phosphorus accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
NKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with NK, phosphorus accumulation and phosphorus utilization efficiency under NPK + B were significantly increased (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1672 · show in text ↑
e1

“levels in rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus biochar increased phosphorus utilization efficiency over NK.

Treatment
NPK + Be0
Outcome
phosphorus utilization efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
NKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with NK, phosphorus accumulation and phosphorus utilization efficiency under NPK + B were significantly increased (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1672 · show in text ↑
e1

“levels in rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus biochar, NK plus biochar and NPK increased biomass yield over NK by 6.28–12.25%.

Treatment
NPK + B, NK + B, and NPKe0
Outcome
biomass yielde0
Direction
surpassede0
Value
6.28–12.25%e0
Comparator
NKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average of biomass yield, grain yield, and harvest index of NPK + B, NK + B, and NPK significantly surpassed those of NK by 6.28–12.25%, 19.80–42.13%, and 11.59–24.64%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1674–1859 · show in text ↑
e1

“levels in rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus biochar, NK plus biochar and NPK increased grain yield over NK by 19.80–42.13%.

Treatment
NPK + B, NK + B, and NPKe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
surpassede0
Value
19.80–42.13%e0
Comparator
NKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average of biomass yield, grain yield, and harvest index of NPK + B, NK + B, and NPK significantly surpassed those of NK by 6.28–12.25%, 19.80–42.13%, and 11.59–24.64%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1674–1859 · show in text ↑
e1

“levels in rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus biochar, NK plus biochar and NPK increased harvest index over NK by 11.59–24.64%.

Treatment
NPK + B, NK + B, and NPKe0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
surpassede0
Value
11.59–24.64%e0
Comparator
NKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average of biomass yield, grain yield, and harvest index of NPK + B, NK + B, and NPK significantly surpassed those of NK by 6.28–12.25%, 19.80–42.13%, and 11.59–24.64%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1674–1859 · show in text ↑
e1

“levels in rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus biochar differed significantly from the other treatments.

Treatment
NPK + Be0
Outcome
significant differencee0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant difference was observed between NPK + B and the other treatments (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1871–1960 · show in text ↑
e1

“levels in rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCA gave 89.5% positive PC1 correlation.

Outcome
positive correlatione0
Value
89.5%e0
Qualifier
PC1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Principal component analysis of the two-year mean data revealed a strong positive correlation of 89.5% for PC1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1962–2072 · show in text ↑
e1

“levels in rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCA gave 4.4% negative PC2 correlation.

Outcome
negative correlatione0
Value
4.4%e0
Qualifier
PC2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a minor negative correlation of 4.4% for PC2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2077–2121 · show in text ↑
e1

“levels in rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1162 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attributed improved salt tolerance and yield to ionic balance and physiological status.

Treatment
combination of biochar and phosphorus fertilizere0
Outcome
increased yielde0
Qualifier
through improved ionic balance and physiological statuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of biochar and phosphorus fertilizer effectively enhances salt and alkali tolerance in rice plants, resulting in increased yield through improved ionic balance and physiological status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2162–2362 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: osmolytes · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · physiology: oxidative · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fertilization · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

fertilization · physiology: ion balance · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.