Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The same treatment gave significantly greater seed index of 2.60 g.

A claim from Biofortification in lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus) through improved fertilizer management in Central Zone of India · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave significantly greater seed index of 2.60 g.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
RDF + Soil application of ZnSO4 2.5 kg ha−1 + SI with bfr LNm 43ae0
Outcome
seed indexe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.60 ge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment (RDF + Soil application of ZnSO4 2.5 kg ha−1 + SI with bfr LNm 43a) resulted in significantly higher growth attributes, such as plant height (37.46 cm), number of branches (4.38), yield attributes {viz. no. of pods (105.93) and seed index (2.60 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–575
t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–51

Title

Biofortification in lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus) through improved fertilizer management in Central Zone of India

Pankaj Suryavanshi; RP Singh Journal of Food Legumes 2019

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-2d06ccf68dc4e043680562fedf41fe46f883f2f96abacac0ee272f8b20b2b33c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

zinc sulfate · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

99 papers: 86 positive, 13 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

90 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

application · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 57 positive, 4 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.