Intervention effectmodel-written summary

2,4-D at the 2X rate and pyraflufen-ethyl/2,4-D ester at the 2X rate reduced dry bean aboveground biomass by as much as 32%.

A claim from Tolerance of Dry Beans to Pyraflufen-Ethyl/2,4-D Ester · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D at the 2X rate and pyraflufen-ethyl/2,4-D ester at the 2X rate reduced dry bean aboveground biomass by as much as 32%.

Taxon
dry beane0
Treatment
2,4-D (2X rate) and pyraflufen-ethyl/2,4-D ester (2X rate)e0
Outcome
dry bean aboveground biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
as much as 32%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“except for 2,4-D (2X rate) and pyraflufen-ethyl/2,4-D ester (2X rate) which reduced dry bean aboveground biomass as much as 32% and plant height up to 28%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1184

Title

Tolerance of Dry Beans to Pyraflufen-Ethyl/2,4-D Ester

Nader Soltani; Christy Shropshire; Peter H. Sikkema Journal of Agricultural Science 2022. doi:10.5539/jas.v14n9p40

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-2dbcb3470b9bc43db6ae86a03186d994cfd9aa0e9f15cd9b1604811890c66560 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

2,4-D · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

18 papers: 9 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
    Supplemented B5 produced more bean callus than the specified half-strength MS medium.

    Production of transgenic bean callus via genetic transformation by DNA-coated tungsten particles · 2003 · compared with half strength MS medium supplemented with 0.5 or 0.75mg/1 BA and 0.1 mg/1 NAA

    Opposite direction

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

ester · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.