Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 75% recommended fertilizer dose plus Zn, vermicompost and Azotobacter gave wheat grain and straw yields at par with the 100% combination.

A claim from The effect of integrated use of vermicompost, biofertilizer (Azotobacter chroococcum) and inorganic fertilizers (N, P, K and Zn) on yield and nutrient content and their uptake by wheat. · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% recommended fertilizer dose plus Zn, vermicompost and Azotobacter gave wheat grain and straw yields at par with the 100% combination.

Treatment
75% recommended fertilizer dose plus Zn, Vermicompost (Vc) and Azotobactere2
Outcome
grain and straw yielde1
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Conjuctive use of Vermicompost, Azotobacter and Zinc in collaboration with 100% recommended fertilizer dose produced significantly higher grain and straw yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–484
e2

“However, these results remained at par with those recorded with 75% recommended fertilizer dose plus Zn, Vermicompost (Vc) and Azotobacter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–624

Title

The effect of integrated use of vermicompost, biofertilizer (Azotobacter chroococcum) and inorganic fertilizers (N, P, K and Zn) on yield and nutrient content and their uptake by wheat.

S. A. Rather; Neerja Sharma INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES 2009

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-4bb11eb0dd3f123b6db626b06bd3252adfb3bd7bbfdf48c7d6dda9bbe62f7293 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Azotobacter · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

88 papers: 87 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Azotobacter with nano Zn-Fe oxide increased grain yield by 88% compared with control under severe water limitation.

    Effects of Biofertilizers and Nano Zinc-Iron Oxide on Yield and Physicochemical Properties of Wheat under Water Deficit Conditions · 2020 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Humic plus 192 kg N with amino acids and Azotobacter+yeast gave the highest flag leaf area, total dry weight and tiller number.

    Nitrogen use Rationalization and Boosting Wheat Productivity by Applying Packages of Humic, Amino Acids, and Microorganisms · 2020

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    T10 produced the highest wheat grain yield among the treatments.

    Integrated Nutrient Management for Improving, Fertilizer Use Efficiency, Soil Biodiversity and Productivity of Wheat in Irrigated Rice Wheat Cropping System in Indo-Gangatic Plains of India · 2017 · compared with other treatments

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Azotobacter inoculation increased wheat grain yield by 16.5%–19.42% over non-inoculated treatments.

    Comparative study of Azotobacter with or without other fertilizers on growth and yield of wheat in Western hills of Nepal · 2018 · compared with non inoculated treatments

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Residual integrated nitrogen, manure, and Azotobacter increased wheat yield attributes and grain yield.

    Productivity and Sustainability of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)–Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cropping System as Influenced by Prilled Urea, Farmyard Manure and Azotobacter · 2004

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    The 150 kg Nlha plus FYM plus Azotobacter treatment increased wheat growth, nutrient uptake, available N and grain and straw yields significantly.

    Effect of integrated nutrient management on productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under limited and adequate irrigation supplies · 2001

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Single or combined Azotobacter and mycorrhiza inoculation significantly increased spikes per square meter of wheat compared with no inoculation.

    Response of Winter Wheat to Co-Inoculation with Azotobacter and Arbescular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) under Different Sources of Nitrogen Fertilizer · 2010 · compared with without inoculation treatment

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Azotobacter strain (Azo-8) with urea and farmyard manure increased yield of dryland wheat by 27% over control.

    Effectiveness of Azotobacter bio-inoculant for wheat grown under dryland condition. · 2013 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

79 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this claim · 455 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Zinc application by any tested method significantly increased grain yield in all wheat cultivars.

    Effect of different zinc application methods on grain yield and zinc concentration in wheat cultivars grown on zinc‐deficient calcareous soils · 1997

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Zinc deficiency decreased wheat grain yield.

    Effects of Zinc Deficiency and Drought on Grain Yield of Field‐grown Wheat Cultivars in Central Anatolia · 2007

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. positive
    Under field drought, foliar zinc increased grain yield by 15%.

    Alleviation of drought stress in winter wheat by late foliar application of zinc, boron, and manganese · 2012

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Soil Zn application increased wheat grain yield by 10.5% under adequate water supply.

    Physiological Responses and Yield of Wheat Plants in Zinc-Mediated Alleviation of Drought Stress · 2017

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Application of nano Zn-Fe oxide increased wheat grain yield by about 17.40% compared with no nano oxide at the highest salinity level.

    Effects of bio fertilizer and nano Zn-Fe oxide on physiological traits, antioxidant enzymes activity and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) under salinity stress · 2017 · compared with no application of nano oxide

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Seeds with 800 and 1,465 ng Zn seed‐1 produced significantly higher grain yield than low zinc seed.

    Effect of seed zinc content on grain yield and zinc concentration of wheat grown in zinc‐deficient calcareous soils · 1998 · compared with low seed‐Zn

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    The combination of Pseudomonas inoculation with zinc seed priming and soil application was more effective in improving grain yield of wheat.

    Pseudomonas-aided zinc application improves the productivity and biofortification of bread wheat · 2018

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Zinc fertilization significantly increased grain yield across cultivars and years.

    EFFECTS OF ZINC FERTILIZATION ON GRAIN YIELD AND SHOOT CONCENTRATIONS OF ZINC, BORON, AND PHOSPHORUS OF 25 WHEAT CULTIVARS GROWN ON A ZINC-DEFICIENT AND BORON-TOXIC SOIL · 2001

    Opposite direction

502 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3,114 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Nano chitosan-NPK fertilizer significantly increased wheat harvest, crop and mobilization indices in sandy soil relative to normal non-fertilized and normal NPK-fertilized plants.

    Nano chitosan-NPK fertilizer enhances the growth and productivity of wheat plants grown in sandy soil · 2016 · compared with normal non-fertilized and normal fertilized NPK

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Optimum nitrogen or break crops increased wheat yield by 378 kg ha −1.

    Increasing Water Use and Water Use Efficiency in Dryland Wheat · 2001

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    FYM applied to rice increased subsequent wheat yield by about 6% against urea alone.

    Long‐Term Effects of Organic Inputs on Yield and Soil Fertility in the Rice–Wheat Rotation · 2004 · compared with urea alone

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Biochar with inoculated fertilizer significantly increased wheat yield.

    Direct and residual effect of biochar application on mycorrhizal root colonisation, growth and nutrition of wheat · 2010

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Single and dual inoculation with P2O5 significantly increased spike length and grain yield.

    Rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacteria improve the yield and phosphorus uptake in wheat (Triticum aestivum). · 2008

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Tactical nitrogen or cultivar maturity management increased modeled average profit by up to 20%.

    The value of skill in seasonal climate forecasting to wheat crop management in a region with high climatic variability · 1996 · compared with fixed

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Compost gave greater residual nutrient support to wheat than fertilizer or manure.

    Compost, Manure and Synthetic Fertilizer Influences Crop Yields, Soil Properties, Nitrate Leaching and Crop Nutrient Content · 2009 · compared with conventional synthetic fertilizer and raw dairy manure

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    The highest wheat grain yield was achieved with 160 kg N per ha plus 30 Mg compost per ha.

    Effect of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Grain Yield and Protein Banding Pattern of Wheat · 2010

    Opposite direction

3,429 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.