Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Urea spray increased Washington Navel orange fruit set.

A claim from Studies on the control of alternate bearing in citrus. VII · 1962

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea spray increased Washington Navel orange fruit set.

Taxon
Washington Navel orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
urea spraye1
Outcome
fruit sete1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The fruit set of Washington Navel orange was increased by the application of gibberellin or urea spray in the flowering or young fruit period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–522

Title

Studies on the control of alternate bearing in citrus. VII

T. IWASAKI; M. NISHIURA; T. SHICHIJO; et al. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 1962. doi:10.2503/jjshs.31.101

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-4ce4ee90aeb0767242cd68435823d5e66964110a717b5851a822db50ae8f7094 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results differ

48 papers: 39 positive, 9 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

application · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 65 positive, 12 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

68 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.