Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined zinc, iron and FYM produced straw yield of 71.86 and 75.18 q h-1 in two years.

A claim from Biofortification effect of FYM zinc and iron on yield and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined zinc, iron and FYM produced straw yield of 71.86 and 75.18 q h-1 in two years.

Treatment
Soil application of Zinc and Two foliar applications of Iron (one at heading and the other at milking stage) along with 10 t FYM h-1e0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
71.86 and 75.18 q h-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil application of Zinc and Two foliar applications of Iron (one at heading and the other at milking stage) along with 10 t FYM h-1 gave highest grain yield (53.95 and 56.95 q h-1) and straw yield (71.86 and 75.18 q h-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–357
t0

“Biofortification effect of FYM zinc and iron on yield and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97

Title

Biofortification effect of FYM zinc and iron on yield and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Srishti Nisha; Uma Shanker Tiwari; Rajendra Krishna Pathak The Pharma Innovation 2023. doi:10.22271/tpi.2023.v12.i1d.17998

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-4e940a1ee52ec7ac1bc51df726f50b4b09a43e3804b3eeb8a7e7e840b5e684a9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

90 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this claim · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

502 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this claim · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

868 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.