Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T8 significantly increased effective tillers, spike length and spike number over T1.

A claim from Effect of Iron and Zinc Enriched FYM on Growth, Yield and Quality of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L) in Salt Affected Soils of Gujarat · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 significantly increased effective tillers, spike length and spike number over T1.

Treatment
0.5 t FYM ha-1 enriched with 0.75 kg Zn and 1.5 kg Fee0
Outcome
effective tillers per plant, length of spike, no. of spikes per plante0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
T1e1
Setting
salt affected soils of Gujaratt0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of recommended dose of fertilizer (120-60-00 NPK kg ha-1) on the basis of STV + 0.5 t FYM ha-1 enriched with 0.75 kg Zn and 1.5 kg Fe (T8) recorded significantly higher effective tillers per plant, length of spike, no. of spikes per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–1021
e1

“over T1 (Recommended dose of fertilizer on the basis of STV only)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1158
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L) in Salt Affected Soils of Gujarat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–130

Title

Effect of Iron and Zinc Enriched FYM on Growth, Yield and Quality of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L) in Salt Affected Soils of Gujarat

J.K. Malav; N.N. Salvi; J.K. Patel; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.806.354

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-56fbbff440d59bced5ba5d2ee0bc01849f4d60f46babe1ee60f284e5593cd585 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

90 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this claim · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

502 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this claim · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

3,429 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.