Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Schedule-1 gibberellic acid treatment gave a higher berry firmness than schedule-2.

A claim from Effect of gibberellic acid on quality of different grape varieties under northern dry zone of Karnataka · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Schedule-1 gibberellic acid treatment gave a higher berry firmness than schedule-2.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
schedule-1 set of gibberellic acid treatmente1
Outcome
berry firmnesse1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
0.990 kg/cm2e1
Comparator
schedule-2 set of gibberellic acid treatmente1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e1

“maximum berry length (24.74 cm), berry diameter (14.31cm), 100 berry weight (317.11 g), pulp weight (296.1 g), peel weight (22.30 g) and pulp: peel ratio (13.39), berry firmness (0.990 kg/cm2) and minimum weight loss for 12 days (10.66%), minimum number of rotten berries (5.31) was recorded in the grapes treated with schedule-1 set of gibberellic acid treatment compared to that of schedule-2 set of gibberellic acid treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1296

Title

Effect of gibberellic acid on quality of different grape varieties under northern dry zone of Karnataka

S.I Athani; D.C Kiran Sagar; D.R. Patil; et al. Annals of Horticulture 2018. doi:10.5958/0976-4623.2018.00023.3

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-6270b2e8a6293bd0e6723b20f39d3e9865da3718278ce2f6b79445065e3aecfb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

Gibberellic acid · quality: postharvest · VitisPositive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.