Intervention effectmodel-written summary

High CPPU with GA3 increased grape berry weight, size and firmness.

A claim from EFFECT OF SOME GIBBERELLIC ACID AND FORCHLORFNURON APPLICATION ON PRODUCTIVITY AND BERRIES DEVELOPMENT OF EARLY SWEET GRAPES · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High CPPU with GA3 increased grape berry weight, size and firmness.

Taxon
grapee1
Material
Early Sweete1
Treatment
Excessive CPPU doses + spraying clusters with GA3e0
Outcome
berry weight, size and firmnesse0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Excessive CPPU doses + spraying clusters with GA3 increases yield and physical properties of berries i.e. berry weight, size and firmness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–925
e1

“Early Sweet grape cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–302

Title

EFFECT OF SOME GIBBERELLIC ACID AND FORCHLORFNURON APPLICATION ON PRODUCTIVITY AND BERRIES DEVELOPMENT OF EARLY SWEET GRAPES

A. E. Hassan; E. H. M. Behary Menoufia Journal of Plant Production 2021. doi:10.21608/mjppf.2021.175593

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e74ded77dc25b2781a83b51678b56b955d6683913b961fbf2de1fc04d1e7296d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Gibberellic acid · quality: postharvest · VitisPositive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

cluster · quality: postharvest · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

forchlorfenuron · quality: postharvest · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.