Intervention effectmodel-written summary

100% RDF plus 2% urea spray was superior to three other nutrient regimes for growth and yield attributes.

A claim from Effect of integrated nutrient management and drought mitigating practices on performance of rainfed chickpea (Cicer arietinum) · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF plus 2% urea spray was superior to three other nutrient regimes for growth and yield attributes.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100% RDF + 2% urea spraye0
Outcome
growth and yield attributese0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
100% RDF + 25% N (VC), 100% RDF + 5 kg Zn/ha and 100% RDFe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 100% RDF + 2% urea spray proved significantly superior to the 100% RDF + 25% N (VC), 100% RDF + 5 kg Zn/ha and 100% RDF in terms of growth and yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–663
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–108

Title

Effect of integrated nutrient management and drought mitigating practices on performance of rainfed chickpea (Cicer arietinum)

SAVITA DEWANGAN; RAJENDRA PRASAD SINGH; M K SINGH; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2017. doi:10.56093/ijas.v87i3.68596

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-6b2d1f7bb3d1ae1104955c464c4cd723f99b8d764e893ea2827c5dd08a3942e2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

102 papers: 93 positive, 9 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Chickpea grain yield was unaffected by fertilizer nitrogen supply and ranged from 2.0–2.4 t/ha.

    Nitrogen fixation and soil nitrate interactions in field-grown chickpea ( Cicer arietinum ) and fababean ( Vicia faba ) · 2002

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Above 80–120 kg ha −1 N, chickpea production decreased.

    NITROGEN FIXATION OF GRAIN LEGUMES DIFFERS IN RESPONSE TO NITROGEN FERTILISATION · 2016

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Additional nitrogen had no significant effect on chickpea seed yield.

    Response of Chickpea to Nitrogen, and a Comparison of the Factors Affecting Chickpea Seed Yield with those Affecting Wheat Grain Yield · 1995

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Different nitrogen levels did not influence NBeG47 seed yield, yield attributes or plant biometrics.

    Suitability of chickpea ‘NBeG47’ for mechanical harvesting under rainfed condition · 2015

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Nitrogen fertilizer did not increase seed yield in either legume.

    Effect of irrigation on growth and yield of Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). · 2008

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Nitrogen did not increase chickpea seed yield.

    Effect of sowing date, nitrogen and rhizobium inoculation on flowering and development of yield in chickpeas · 1993

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Lower nitrogen reduced crop yields.

    Growth Performance of Mustard and Chickpea under Different Intercropping Patterns and Nitrogen Fertilizer Levels in North-Western India · 2025

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Nitrogen doses of 0 to 120 kg ha(-1) had no significant effect on chickpea yield and yield components.

    The effect of bacterial inoculation and different nitrogen doses on yield and yield components of some chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2009

    Opposite direction

93 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

177 papers: 173 positive, 4 negative or no effect

172 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Foliar iron application decreased mean shoot dry matter yield.

    Iron‐Manganese Interaction in Chickpea as Affected by Foliar and Soil Application of Iron in a Calcareous Soil · 2005

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Ultra low volume spraying did not influence chickpea grain yield.

    Performance of different sprayers against gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on chickpea · 2007

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Combined irrigation and foliar spray did not significantly affect yield and related traits.

    Effect of Foliar Application of Organic and Inorganic Substances on the Yield of Chick Pea under Limited Water Supply · 2019

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Beauveria bassiana produced the lowest treatment yield, 11.67 q/ha.

    Studies the Effect of Some Bio-rational Insecticides on Chickpea Crop against Gram Pod Borer Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) · 2025

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Foliar ZnSO4 partially reversed the adverse effect of zinc deficiency on chickpea pollen-stigma morphology and pollen fertility.

    Improving reproductive efficiency of chickpea by foliar application of zinc · 2012 · compared with zinc deficient plants

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Foliar ZFN at pre-flowering showed the highest potential to increase grain yield, Zn content and Fe content compared with mineral and chelated forms.

    Comparative Efficiency of Mineral, Chelated and Nano Forms of Zinc and Iron for Improvement of Zinc and Iron in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) through Biofortification · 2021 · compared with mineral (0.5% Zn and Fe), chelated (0.3% Zn and Fe)

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Foliar proline increased yield characteristics of cadmium-stressed chickpea.

    Proline enhances antioxidative enzyme activity, photosynthesis and yield of Cicer arietinum L. exposed to cadmium stress · 2013

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Three foliar Zn-EDTA sprays produced the greatest grain and straw yields.

    Effects of Source and Method of Zinc Application on Yield, Zinc Biofortification of Grain, and Zn Uptake and Use Efficiency in Chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.) · 2015

    Same direction

168 papers more in this group

See all 177 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    T7 gave maximum chickpea number of branches plant-1, exceeding most treatments but not T2 or T6.

    Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth attributes, nitrogen content, nitrogen uptake and quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2020 · compared with all other treatments except application of 100% RDF (T2) and 75% RDF + FYM 5.0 t ha-1 PSB (T6)

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    The 125% RDF plus microbial consortium treatment gave better seed yield of 25.8 q ha-1.

    Nodulation, Yield and Economics of Machine Planted Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under Varied Spacing and Nutrient Management · 2023

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. no effect
    Chickpea grain yield was unaffected by fertilizer nitrogen supply and ranged from 2.0–2.4 t/ha.

    Nitrogen fixation and soil nitrate interactions in field-grown chickpea ( Cicer arietinum ) and fababean ( Vicia faba ) · 2002

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Nitrogen fertilization had no significant effect on nutrient uptake and biomass production.

    Arbuscular mycorrhiza enhances nutrient uptake in chickpea · 2011

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Field growth, shoot P concentration and seed yield were unaffected by P fertilization.

    Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhiza and Phosphorus Uptake of Chickpea Grown in Northern Syria · 1992

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Nitrogen fertilizer did not increase seed yield in either legume.

    Effect of irrigation on growth and yield of Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). · 2008

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Phosphorus fertilization did not affect chickpea yield components.

    Effect of Different Soil Tillage, Weed Control and Phosphorus Fertilization on Weed Biomas, Protein and Phosphorus Content of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2006

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    A 25% fertilizer reduction lowered chickpea seed yield by 6.6% in 2005-06.

    Effect of row ratio and fertility levels on chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and linseed (Linum usitatissimum) intercropping system · 2001 · compared with RDF

    Opposite direction

336 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.