Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Preemergence flumioxazin plus chlorimuron followed by dicamba plus glyphosate, with or without acetochlor, improved waterhemp control over early postemergence comparators.

A claim from Glyphosate-Resistant Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) and Waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) Management in Dicamba-Resistant Soybean (Glycine max) · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence flumioxazin plus chlorimuron followed by dicamba plus glyphosate, with or without acetochlor, improved waterhemp control over early postemergence comparators.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Flumioxazin plus chlorimuron applied PRE followed by dicamba plus glyphosate or dicamba plus glyphosate plus acetochlore0
Interactor
waterhempe0weed
Outcome
control of GR waterhempe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
glyphosate plus fomesafen or glyphosate alone applied EPOSTe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flumioxazin plus chlorimuron applied PRE followed by dicamba plus glyphosate or dicamba plus glyphosate plus acetochlor provided greater control of GR waterhemp than glyphosate plus fomesafen or glyphosate alone applied EPOST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1547
t0

“Soybean (Glycine max)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–140

Title

Glyphosate-Resistant Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) and Waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) Management in Dicamba-Resistant Soybean (Glycine max)

Douglas J. Spaunhorst; Simone Siefert-Higgins; Kevin W. Bradley Weed Technology 2014. doi:10.1614/wt-d-13-00091.1

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-8d02be240b6f9a94e167a55c7feab24ca379fadce15e5f8d6d8dac68e9aba613 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

chlorimuron · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

dicamba · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 27 positive, 4 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

glyphosate · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

76 papers: 70 positive, 6 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

67 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

3 of 5 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.