Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Actinobacteria-derived zinc nanoparticles gave significantly higher net returns (₹ 63,746 ha-1) in wheat.

A claim from Agronomic fortification of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using biosynthesized zinc nanoparticles · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Actinobacteria-derived zinc nanoparticles gave significantly higher net returns (₹ 63,746 ha-1) in wheat.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
seed priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria (T6)e0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
₹ 63,746 ha-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In wheat seed priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria (T6) recorded significantly higher productive spikes per square meter (259.33 m-2), number of grains per spike (48.50), 1,000 grain weight (42.35 g), grain yield (46.75 q ha-1), straw yield (64.71 q ha-1), zinc content (grain 54.98 ppm and straw 65.75 ppm), zinc uptake (grain 257.03 g ha-1, straw 425.49 g ha-1 and total zinc uptake 682.52 g ha-1), net returns (₹ 63,746 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.49) which was on par with seed priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through Pseudomonas (T3) and commercial zinc nanoparticles (T9).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–1399
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–55

Title

Agronomic fortification of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using biosynthesized zinc nanoparticles

S Nazma; T Sudha; DP Biradar; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2024. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i9b.1452

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-95b7635f10de96fdffd263f62c1df161d14b57780922176c9d0155c610bef5c4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this claim · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

502 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Actinomycetota · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

251 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

3 of 5 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.