Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Biofortification of Wheat Using Biologically Synthesized Zinc Nanoparticles

S. Nazma; T. Sudha; D.P. Biradar; et al.

10
claims
29
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The research was carried out at the Green Nanotechnology Laboratory, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, with a specific emphasis on the biosynthesis of zinc nanoparticles using Pseudomonas and actinobacteria. The zinc nanoparticles were biosynthesized and characterized through UV-Visible spectroscopy, Particle Size Analyzer (PSA), Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX), X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). After biosynthesis and characterization of the nanoparticles (NPs), a pot experiment was conducted under controlled condition to enrich the zinc content in wheat using biosynthesized zinc nanoparticles.In wheatseed priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria(T12) recorded significantly higher number of grains per spike (46.73), 1000 grain weight (42.26 g), grain yield (3.95g plant-1), straw yield (5.97g plant-1), zinc content (grain 55.87μg g-1 and straw 66.27μg g-1) and zincuptake (grain 220.69 μg plant-1, straw 395.63μg plant-1 and total zinc uptake 616.32μg plant-1), which was on par with seed priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through Pseudomonas (T5).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming plus foliar spraying at 500 ppm with actinobacteria-biosynthesized zinc nanoparticles (T12) gave significantly higher number of grains per spike (46.73) in wheat.

Treatment
priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria(T12)e0
Outcome
number of grains per spikee1
Direction
highere2
Value
46.73e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheatseed priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria(T12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–868 · show in text ↑
e1

“number of grains per spike (46.73)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–933 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T12 treatment gave significantly higher 1000 grain weight (42.26 g) in wheat.

Treatment
priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria(T12)e0
Outcome
1000 grain weighte1
Direction
highere2
Value
42.26 ge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheatseed priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria(T12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–868 · show in text ↑
e1

“1000 grain weight (42.26 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–962 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T12 treatment gave significantly higher grain yield (3.95 g per plant) in wheat.

Treatment
priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria(T12)e0
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere2
Value
3.95g plant-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheatseed priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria(T12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–868 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield (3.95g plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–991 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T12 treatment gave significantly higher straw yield (5.97 g per plant) in wheat.

Treatment
priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria(T12)e0
Outcome
straw yielde1
Direction
highere2
Value
5.97g plant-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheatseed priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria(T12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–868 · show in text ↑
e1

“straw yield (5.97g plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1020 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T12 treatment gave significantly higher grain zinc content (55.87 ug per g) in wheat.

Organ / stage
graine1
Treatment
priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria(T12)e0
Outcome
zinc contente1
Direction
highere2
Value
55.87μg g-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheatseed priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria(T12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–868 · show in text ↑
e1

“zinc content (grain 55.87μg g-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1053 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T12 treatment gave significantly higher straw zinc content (66.27 ug per g) in wheat.

Organ / stage
strawe1
Treatment
priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria(T12)e0
Outcome
zinc contente1
Direction
highere2
Value
66.27μg g-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheatseed priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria(T12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–868 · show in text ↑
e1

“zinc content (grain 55.87μg g-1 and straw 66.27μg g-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1075 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T12 treatment gave significantly higher grain zinc uptake (220.69 ug per plant) in wheat.

Organ / stage
graine1
Treatment
priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria(T12)e0
Outcome
zincuptakee1
Direction
highere2
Value
220.69 μg plant-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheatseed priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria(T12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–868 · show in text ↑
e1

“zincuptake (grain 220.69 μg plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1116 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T12 treatment gave significantly higher straw zinc uptake (395.63 ug per plant) in wheat.

Organ / stage
strawe1
Treatment
priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria(T12)e0
Outcome
zincuptakee1
Direction
highere2
Value
395.63μg plant-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheatseed priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria(T12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–868 · show in text ↑
e1

“zincuptake (grain 220.69 μg plant-1, straw 395.63μg plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1140 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T12 treatment gave significantly higher total zinc uptake (616.32 ug per plant) in wheat.

Treatment
priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria(T12)e0
Outcome
total zinc uptakee1
Direction
highere2
Value
616.32μg plant-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheatseed priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria(T12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–868 · show in text ↑
e1

“total zinc uptake 616.32μg plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1179 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The T12 treatment was on par with seed priming plus foliar spraying at 500 ppm with Pseudomonas-biosynthesized zinc nanoparticles (T5).

Treatment
priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria(T12)e0
Outcome
on pare1
Direction
on pare1
Comparator
seed priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through Pseudomonas (T5)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheatseed priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria(T12)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–868 · show in text ↑
e1

“which was on par with seed priming @ 500 ppm and foliar spraying @ 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through Pseudomonas (T5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1348 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Actinomycetota · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Actinomycetota · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

seed treatment · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 26 positive, 1 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 101 positive, 4 negative or no effect

100 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

256 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.