Paper · 2024 · Journal of Experimental Agriculture International

Seed Priming and Foliar Spraying with Biosynthesized Zinc Nanoparticles on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Production

S. Nazma; T. Sudha; D.P. Biradar; et al.

9
claims
27
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The research was carried out at the Green Nanotechnology Laboratory, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, with a specific emphasis on the biosynthesis of zinc nanoparticles using Pseudomonas and actinobacteria. The zinc nanoparticles were biosynthesized and characterized through UV-Visible spectroscopy, Particle Size Analyzer (PSA), Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), (EDX), X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). After biosynthesis and characterization of the nanoparticles (NPs), a pot experiment was conducted under controlled condition to know the effect of biosynthesized zinc nanoparticles on wheat. Seed priming at 500 ppm and foliar spraying at 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria (T12) recorded significantly higher plant height (93.73 cm), number of tillers per plant (4.87), total dry matter production (45.57 g pot-1), number of grains per spike (46.73), grain weight per spike (1.83 g), test weight (42.26 g), grain yield (3.95 g plant-1) and straw yield (5.97 g plant-1)and found on par with seed priming at 500 ppm and foliar spraying at 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through Pseudomonas (T5).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming and foliar spraying with actinobacteria-biosynthesized zinc nanoparticles at 500 ppm significantly increased wheat plant height to 93.73 cm.

Organ / stage
panicle initiation stagee1
Treatment
Seed priming at 500 ppm and foliar spraying at 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria (T12)e1
Outcome
plant heighte2
Direction
highere1
Value
93.73 cme2
Setting
controlled conditione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Seed priming at 500 ppm and foliar spraying at 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria (T12) recorded significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–846 · show in text ↑
e2

“plant height (93.73 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–870 · show in text ↑
e3

“a pot experiment was conducted under controlled condition to know the effect of biosynthesized zinc nanoparticles on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–664 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment significantly increased the number of tillers per plant to 4.87 in wheat.

Organ / stage
panicle initiation stagee1
Treatment
Seed priming at 500 ppm and foliar spraying at 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria (T12)e1
Outcome
number of tillers per plante2
Direction
highere1
Value
4.87e2
Setting
controlled conditione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Seed priming at 500 ppm and foliar spraying at 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria (T12) recorded significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–846 · show in text ↑
e2

“number of tillers per plant (4.87)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–906 · show in text ↑
e3

“a pot experiment was conducted under controlled condition to know the effect of biosynthesized zinc nanoparticles on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–664 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment significantly increased total dry matter production to 45.57 g pot-1 in wheat.

Organ / stage
panicle initiation stagee1
Treatment
Seed priming at 500 ppm and foliar spraying at 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria (T12)e1
Outcome
total dry matter productione2
Direction
highere1
Value
45.57 g pot-1e2
Setting
controlled conditione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Seed priming at 500 ppm and foliar spraying at 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria (T12) recorded significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–846 · show in text ↑
e2

“total dry matter production (45.57 g pot-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–951 · show in text ↑
e3

“a pot experiment was conducted under controlled condition to know the effect of biosynthesized zinc nanoparticles on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–664 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment significantly increased the number of grains per spike to 46.73 in wheat.

Organ / stage
panicle initiation stagee1
Treatment
Seed priming at 500 ppm and foliar spraying at 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria (T12)e1
Outcome
number of grains per spikee2
Direction
highere1
Value
46.73e2
Setting
controlled conditione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Seed priming at 500 ppm and foliar spraying at 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria (T12) recorded significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–846 · show in text ↑
e2

“number of grains per spike (46.73)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–987 · show in text ↑
e3

“a pot experiment was conducted under controlled condition to know the effect of biosynthesized zinc nanoparticles on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–664 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment significantly increased grain weight per spike to 1.83 g in wheat.

Organ / stage
panicle initiation stagee1
Treatment
Seed priming at 500 ppm and foliar spraying at 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria (T12)e1
Outcome
grain weight per spikee2
Direction
highere1
Value
1.83 ge2
Setting
controlled conditione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Seed priming at 500 ppm and foliar spraying at 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria (T12) recorded significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–846 · show in text ↑
e2

“grain weight per spike (1.83 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1020 · show in text ↑
e3

“a pot experiment was conducted under controlled condition to know the effect of biosynthesized zinc nanoparticles on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–664 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment significantly increased test weight to 42.26 g in wheat.

Organ / stage
panicle initiation stagee1
Treatment
Seed priming at 500 ppm and foliar spraying at 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria (T12)e1
Outcome
test weighte2
Direction
highere1
Value
42.26 ge2
Setting
controlled conditione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Seed priming at 500 ppm and foliar spraying at 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria (T12) recorded significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–846 · show in text ↑
e2

“test weight (42.26 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1043 · show in text ↑
e3

“a pot experiment was conducted under controlled condition to know the effect of biosynthesized zinc nanoparticles on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–664 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment significantly increased grain yield to 3.95 g plant-1 in wheat.

Organ / stage
panicle initiation stagee1
Treatment
Seed priming at 500 ppm and foliar spraying at 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria (T12)e1
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
highere1
Value
3.95 g plant-1e2
Setting
controlled conditione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Seed priming at 500 ppm and foliar spraying at 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria (T12) recorded significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–846 · show in text ↑
e2

“grain yield (3.95 g plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1073 · show in text ↑
e3

“a pot experiment was conducted under controlled condition to know the effect of biosynthesized zinc nanoparticles on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–664 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment significantly increased straw yield to 5.97 g plant-1 in wheat.

Organ / stage
panicle initiation stagee1
Treatment
Seed priming at 500 ppm and foliar spraying at 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria (T12)e1
Outcome
straw yielde2
Direction
highere1
Value
5.97 g plant-1e2
Setting
controlled conditione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Seed priming at 500 ppm and foliar spraying at 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria (T12) recorded significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–846 · show in text ↑
e2

“straw yield (5.97 g plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1106 · show in text ↑
e3

“a pot experiment was conducted under controlled condition to know the effect of biosynthesized zinc nanoparticles on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–664 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through Pseudomonas (T5) applied the same way were on par with the actinobacteria-derived (T12) treatment for these wheat traits.

Treatment
seed priming at 500 ppm and foliar spraying at 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through Pseudomonas (T5)e1
Outcome
found on pare1
Direction
on pare1
Comparator
zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria (T12)e2
Setting
controlled conditione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“found on par with seed priming at 500 ppm and foliar spraying at 500 ppm at panicle initiation stage with zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through Pseudomonas (T5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1274 · show in text ↑
e2

“zinc nanoparticles biosynthesized through actinobacteria (T12) recorded significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–846 · show in text ↑
e3

“a pot experiment was conducted under controlled condition to know the effect of biosynthesized zinc nanoparticles on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–664 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

200 papers: 155 positive, 45 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
    Wheat plants with low Mn or low Zn supply showed no growth differences from controls at the three harvests.

    Distribution and remobilization of Zn and Mn during grain development in wheat · 1994 · compared with controls (sufficient Zn and Mn)

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. negative

196 papers more in this group

See all 200 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Actinomycetota · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Actinomycetota · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

seed treatment · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

application · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 38 positive, 5 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

8 of 14 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.