Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Co-inoculation of soybean with Bradyrhizobium and Pseudomonas significantly increased soybean growth, yield attributes and grain yield over single or no inoculation.

A claim from Effect of application of biofertilizers to soybean (Glycine max) and nitrogen to tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) in soybean – tobacco cropping system · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation of soybean with Bradyrhizobium and Pseudomonas significantly increased soybean growth, yield attributes and grain yield over single or no inoculation.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Co-inoculation of soybean with Bradyrhizobium + Pseudomonase1
Interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiume1symbiont
Second interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase1symbiont
Outcome
growth, yield attributes and grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
individual inoculation and no inoculatione1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“biofertilizers to soybean (Glycine max)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–64
e1

“Co-inoculation of soybean with Bradyrhizobium + Pseudomonas recorded significantly higher growth, yield attributes and grain yield than their individual inoculation and no inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–576

Title

Effect of application of biofertilizers to soybean (Glycine max) and nitrogen to tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) in soybean – tobacco cropping system

S.V. Krishna Reddy; S. Kasturi Krishna; J.A.V. Prasad Rao; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2007

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-988c4e37a507af67fb2f201357d7021f50e42f0fc83de032c3c4d0660a7082f9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Bradyrhizobium · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Pseudomonas · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

inoculation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 491 positive, 75 negative or no effect

490 papers in the same direction as this claim · 63 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

557 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.