Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ethephon at 150 ppm plus 10 ppm NAA accelerated ripening and permitted harvest before substantial drop occurred.

A claim from Effects of AVG, NAA, Ethephon, and Summer Pruning on Preharvest Drop and Fruit Quality of `McIntosh' · 1998

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon at 150 ppm plus 10 ppm NAA accelerated ripening and permitted harvest before substantial drop occurred.

Material
McIntoshe0
Treatment
Ethephon (2-chloroethylphosphonic acid) at 150 ppm plus 10 ppm NAAe1
Outcome
ripeninge1
Direction
acceleratede1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`McIntosh' apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–94
e1

“Ethephon (2-chloroethylphosphonic acid) at 150 ppm plus 10 ppm NAA, accelerated ripening and permitted harvest before substantial drop occurred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–815

Title

Effects of AVG, NAA, Ethephon, and Summer Pruning on Preharvest Drop and Fruit Quality of `McIntosh'

E.W. Stover; C.B. Watkins; M.J. Fargione; et al. HortScience 1998. doi:10.21273/hortsci.33.3.513b

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-ab4e04c078cbd12f35400d74d6173cfa44982a502ed0e5cc0592dcb35593d9a1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

32 papers: 26 positive, 6 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 8 positive, 6 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.