Intervention effectmodel-written summary

1-MCP treatment could delay the dissociation of CDTA-soluble pectin polysaccharides.

A claim from Effect of 1-methylcyclopropene on the cell wall polysaccharides degradation characteristics in non-melting-flesh peach fruit · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP treatment could delay the dissociation of CDTA-soluble pectin polysaccharides.

Taxon
peach fruitPrunus persicat0
Treatment
1-MCP treatmente3
Outcome
dissociation of CDTA-soluble pectin polysaccharidese3
Direction
delaye3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“1-MCP treatment could delay the dissociation of CDTA-soluble pectin polysaccharides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–650
t0

“in non-melting-flesh peach fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–124

Title

Effect of 1-methylcyclopropene on the cell wall polysaccharides degradation characteristics in non-melting-flesh peach fruit

Changhai Jin Science and Technology of Food Industry 2012

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-b68f0a4e5ff1af2dd2c78bc1561e2ad66c5f35f23ef7ce82f72f29ef4b18e373 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

1-methylcyclopropene · molecular: metabolites · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.