Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar nutrients at vegetative and pre flowering stage significantly increased plant height, branch number and dry matter.

A claim from EFFECT OF NUTRIENTS FOLIAR APPLICATION ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nutrients at vegetative and pre flowering stage significantly increased plant height, branch number and dry matter.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Treatment
foliar application of nutrients at vegetative and pre flowering stagee0
Outcome
plant height, number of branches plant -1 and dry matter accumulation plant -1e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–91
e0

“Foliar application of 2% urea and foliar application of nutrients at vegetative and pre flowering stage recorded significantly higher plant height, number of branches plant -1 and dry matter accumulation plant -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–212

Title

EFFECT OF NUTRIENTS FOLIAR APPLICATION ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)

PLANT ARCHIVES 2025. doi:10.51470/plantarchives.2025.v25.no.1.035

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-bc4f5ee304565c26eb11b37f11fc667b127079190fad2a25fe2f4fff86e23254 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

stage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 42 positive, 5 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

177 papers: 173 positive, 4 negative or no effect

172 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

168 papers more in this group

See all 177 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.