Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T6 produced maximum TSS of 12.600 Brix.

A claim from Effect of bio-fertilizer and chemical fertilizer on yield and quality of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 produced maximum TSS of 12.600 Brix.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
RDF (800:400:400g NPK + FYM) + 80ml Azotobacter + 80ml PSB (T6)e0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
maximum increasee0
Value
12.600 Brixe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum increase in quality parameters were recorded in the treatment of RDF (800:400:400g NPK + FYM) + 80ml Azotobacter + 80ml PSB (T6) i.e. Juice percent (52.33%), TSS (12.600 Brix), total sugar percent (8.80%), reducing sugar percent (4.48%), non-reducing sugar percent (4.33%) and ascorbic acid content (58.70 mg/100ml juice)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–1092
t0

“sweet orange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85

Title

Effect of bio-fertilizer and chemical fertilizer on yield and quality of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck)

Jugnake Mo; M. T. Patil; Shinde Se International Journal of Chemical Studies 2017

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-c6f693acbed981ef6dd8ff89f75eb96fa11f858bc0d6b1f8b1475cede22c4615 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Azotobacter · quality: sugar starch · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.