Intervention effectmodel-written summary

flag leaf area declined under non irrigation at flowering by 19.3%.

A claim from Effects of late Season Drought Stress on Grain Yield, Protein, Proline and ABA of Bread Wheat Varieties · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

flag leaf area declined under non irrigation at flowering by 19.3%.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
non irrigation at floweringe0
Outcome
flag leaf areae0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
19.3%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“non irrigation at flowering, significantly decreased spike length, no. of seed per spike, TKW, HI, biological yield and flag leaf area by 33.9%, 43.1%, 38.3%, 19.1%, 15.9% and 19.3% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1004
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93

Title

Effects of late Season Drought Stress on Grain Yield, Protein, Proline and ABA of Bread Wheat Varieties

Seyed Mojtaba Kanani; Porang Kasraie; Hasan Abdi International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production 2013

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-e03de3f3e8a98bf6bcdb7eef4c9bd8f768218029e0ab126755a0817d0c49873e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

stage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 24 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this claim · 177 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.