Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The interaction of alternate wetting and drying with mechanical transplanting gave higher gross returns in rice.

A claim from Influence of Irrigation Management Practices and Different Establishment Methods on Nutrient Use Efficiency of Rice · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of alternate wetting and drying with mechanical transplanting gave higher gross returns in rice.

Treatment
alternate wetting and drying up to PI followed by flooding 3 ± 2 cm after PI and mechanical transplantinge3
Outcome
gross returnse3
Direction
highere3
Value
99,377 Rs. ha-1e3
Qualifier
Interactione3
Setting
Zonal Agricultural Research Station, V. C. Farm, Mandyae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Interaction between alternate wetting and drying up to PI followed by flooding 3 ± 2 cm after PI and mechanical transplanting recorded higher gross returns (99,377 Rs. ha-1), net returns (55,112 Rs. ha-1) and B:C ratio (2.25)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–1052
e0

“A field experiment was conducted at Zonal Agricultural Research Station, V. C. Farm, Mandya, to study the effect of irrigation management practices and rice establishment methods on growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) during Kharif 2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243

Title

Influence of Irrigation Management Practices and Different Establishment Methods on Nutrient Use Efficiency of Rice

T. Theerthana; P. S. Fathima; G. R. Denesh; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2020. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2020.911.387

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e12fd449293b41735f322523bb5efde0bf5799487affc1e891049ee0f9b5f880 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

flooding · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

286 papers: 193 positive, 93 negative or no effect

192 papers in the same direction as this claim · 82 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Roots grown in waterlogged soil lost about double the oxygen radially compared with non-waterlogged roots at 23°C.

    Radial Oxygen Losses from Intact Rice Roots as Affected by Distance from the Apex, Respiration and Waterlogging · 1971 · compared with non‐waterlogged plants

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    continuous flooding significantly reduced rice yields.

    Assessing Alternatives for Mitigating Net Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Increasing Yields from Rice Production in China Over the Next Twenty Years · 2006

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Rice grain yield was unaffected by alternative straw management or winter flooding at recommended N fertilization levels.

    Rice Yield and Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency under Alternative Straw Management Practices · 2000

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Stagnant flooding reduced rice yield by 47% across genotypes compared with control conditions.

    Physiological analyses of traits associated with tolerance of long-term partial submergence in rice · 2014 · compared with control conditions

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Non-continuous flooding would maintain rice yield levels.

    Global benefits of non‐continuous flooding to reduce greenhouse gases and irrigation water use without rice yield penalty · 2022

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Flood stress reduced rice yield at panicle differentiation.

    Comprehensive metabolomic, proteomic and physiological analyses of grain yield reduction in rice under abrupt drought–flood alternation stress · 2018

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Submergence and re-aeration decreased above-ground dry matter accumulation in rice.

    Changes in Certain Antioxidative Enzymes and Growth Parameters as a Result of Complete Submergence and Subsequent Re‐aeration of Rice Cultivars Differing in Submergence Tolerance · 2001

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Under drought conditions, flood stress of the DFAA groups reduced rice yield compared with the drought and flood groups.

    Effect of Drought–Flood Abrupt Alternation on Rice Yield and Yield Components · 2019 · compared with drought groups and the flood groups

    Opposite direction

277 papers more in this group

See all 286 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this claim · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Herbicide plus two hand weedings in transplanted rice gives the highest grain yield of 4623 kg ha−1

    Effect of Weed Management and Crop Establishment Methods on Weed Dynamics and Grain Yield of Rice · 2005 · compared with the other treatments

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
    Rice yields were equal under puddled transplanting and direct seeding on puddled or no-tillage flat beds.

    Saving of Water and Labor in a Rice–Wheat System with No‐Tillage and Direct Seeding Technologies · 2007 · compared with conventional puddled transplanting

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Basal or one-week-post-transplant N did not further increase rice yield on high-fertility soil.

    Chlorophyll Meter– and Leaf Color Chart–Based Nitrogen Management for Rice and Wheat in Northwestern India · 2002 · compared with zero‐N plots

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Applying N basally or a week after transplanting did not further increase rice yield under high inherent soil fertility

    Chlorophyll Meter– and Leaf Color Chart–Based Nitrogen Management for Rice and Wheat in Northwestern India · 2002

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Direct seeding reduced panicle length, spikelet number, and primary and secondary branch length and number relative to transplanting.

    Combining Image Analysis, Genome Wide Association Studies and Different Field Trials to Reveal Stable Genetic Regions Related to Panicle Architecture and the Number of Spikelets per Panicle in Rice · 2016 · compared with transplanting

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Without applied nitrogen, transplanted rice yielded 0.3 Mg ha −1 less.

    Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Nitrogen‐15 Balances in Broadcast‐seeded Flooded and Transplanted Rice · 1988

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Late transplanting significantly decreased rice tiller occurrence, biomass accumulation and dry matter remobilization.

    Crop and varietal diversification of rainfed rice based cropping systems for higher productivity and profitability in Eastern India · 2017

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Broadcast and split prilled urea left 11 to 35% of applied nitrogen unrecovered at harvest.

    Nitrogen‐15 Balance and Residual Effects of Urea‐N in Wetland Rice Fields as Affected by Deep Placement Techniques · 1984

    Opposite direction

1,069 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this claim · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Irrigation at 3 DADSW improved rice grain yield by 5.9% over 5 DADSW (5.82 t/ha).

    Effect of different components of SRI on yield, quality, nutrient accumulation and economics of rice (Oryza sativa) in tarai belt of northern India · 2001 · compared with 5 DADSW

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    SRI gave significantly higher grain yield of 10171 kg ha-1 than transplanting and aerobic techniques.

    Influence of crop establishment techniques and sources of nutrients on productivity, energetics and economics of rice · 2008 · compared with transplanting and aerobic techniques

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. negative
    Overall alternate wetting and drying decreased rice yields by 5.4%.

    Rice yields and water use under alternate wetting and drying irrigation: A meta-analysis · 2017

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Rondo grain yield declined in the order continuous flooding, saturated, aerobic.

    Soil Texture and Cultivar Effects on Rice (Oryza sativa, L.) Grain Yield, Yield Components and Water Productivity in Three Water Regimes · 2016

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    The authors found fertilizer and irrigation investment had limited effects on rice production.

    Moving toward rice self-sufficiency in sub-Saharan Africa by 2030: Lessons learned from 10 years of the Coalition for African Rice Development · 2021

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    AWD caused no significant rice yield loss versus CF.

    Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from irrigated rice cultivation through improved fertilizer and water management · 2022 · compared with CF condition

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Irrigation treatments increased spikelet sterility by 16.6%.

    Role of Panicle Exsertion in Water Stress Induced Sterility1 · 1983

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    DI reduced rice grain yield by 31.76-52.19% against CF.

    Rice Performance and Water Use Efficiency under Plastic Mulching with Drip Irrigation · 2013 · compared with CF treatment

    Opposite direction

1,162 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.