Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Topdressing with N, B and Ca significantly increased calcium content and accumulation in peanut stems and leaves.

A claim from Effects of drip irrigation and topdressing on dry matter weight, mineral nutrient absorption and yield of pod-bearing stage in peanut · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Topdressing with N, B and Ca significantly increased calcium content and accumulation in peanut stems and leaves.

Organ / stage
stems and leavese0
Treatment
topdressing of N, B, and Ca fertilizere0
Outcome
calcium content and accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the dry matter weight, nitrogen content and accumulation, calcium content and accumulation, and pod yield of peanut stems and leaves were significantly increased by topdressing of N, B, and Ca fertilizer in the pod-pin stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–878

Title

Effects of drip irrigation and topdressing on dry matter weight, mineral nutrient absorption and yield of pod-bearing stage in peanut

Wen-Jie QIN; Run-Ze GUO; Xiao-Xia ZOU; et al. ACTA AGRONOMICA SINICA 2020. doi:10.3724/sp.j.1006.2021.04109

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e1516f1276865d7896b048a4e5880e59f7f08b1928de8a9a2abe6675deee22ed · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

calcium atom · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Translocation of labelled calcium to peanut fruiting organs was not shown when labelled calcium was added in the fruiting zone.

    Physiological Studies on the Fructification of Peanut : 3. The most beneficial period of calcium supply and changes of carbohydrates in the fruit at its filling period · 1960 · compared with not applied to the fruiting zone where the gynophores reach

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Bunch-type filled-fruit shell alcohol-soluble calcium did not differ among calcium treatments.

    Physiological Studies on Fructification of Peanut : 8. On the relation between the calcium in the fruiting zone and the formation of unfilled fruit. · 1962

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Ca2+ treatment had an insignificant effect on tritiated thymidine uptake.

    Studies on the Correlation Between Seed Vigour and DNA Synthesis in the Axis of Peanut Seed During Early Germination · 1992

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Omitting calcium and/water decreased calcium content in pericarp and seed.

    Calcium Translocation in the Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)1 · 1971

    Same directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  5. positive
    PSB with calcium phosphate produced the strongest soil available phosphorus benefit.

    Role of halotolerant phosphate‐solubilising bacteria on growth promotion of peanut ( Arachis hypogaea ) under saline soil · 2018

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Both treatments increased seed calcium concentration.

    Effect of Calcium and Irrigation Treatments on Peanut Yield, Grade and Seed Quality1 · 1976

    Same direction

  7. positive
    More calcium fertilizer increased soil calcium on Greenville and Tifton soils.

    Response of Early Bunch Peanuts to Calcium and Potassium Fertilization1 · 1979

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Sorbitol-chelated calcium improved leaf calcium concentration by 13.12-19.32% compared with the CK treatment.

    Spraying sorbitol-chelated calcium affected foliar calcium absorption and promoted the yield of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2022 · compared with CK treatment

    Same direction

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 147 positive, 6 negative or no effect

146 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Potash fertilizer accelerated peanut absorption of N, P and K.

    [Effects of potash fertilizer on nutrient absorption by peanut and its yield and benefit]. · 2003

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Nitrogen fertilizer promoted N, P and K absorption under 0~150 kg/hm2.

    Effects of Nitrogen Application on Nutrient Absorption,Yield and Quality of Peanut · 2011

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. no effect
    Greenhouse lime, herbicide, or fertilizer applications did not affect plant morphology or leaf N content.

    Effects of Herbicides, a Nematicide and Rhizobium Inoculant on Yield, Chemical Composition and Nodulation of Starr Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.)1 · 1976

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Foliar N, P, K and S fertilization did not increase nutrient uptake of peanuts.

    Foliar Fertilization Effects on Yield, Quality, Nutrient Uptake, and Vegetative Characteristics of Florunner Peanuts.1,2 · 1982

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Kelud volcanic ash and manure treatment did not significantly affect exchangeable Ca or Ca uptake.

    Ketersediaan dan Serapan Ca Pada Kacang Tanah di Tanah Alfisols yang Diberi Abu Vulkanik Kelud dan Pupuk Kandang · 2017

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Bicarbonate added to soil or nutrient solution decreased Fe(III) reductase activity in roots from the solution chamber.

    Mechanisms of bicarbonate induced iron-deficiency chlorosis of peanut on calcareous soils · 2005

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    B and Mo fertilization did not increase nutrient uptake.

    NUTRIENT UPTAKE - POD YIELD RELATIONSHIP DUE TO MACRO AND MICRONUTRIENTS IN RAINFED SPANISH GROUNDNUT · 1984

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Application of the bacterial manure did not reduce soil nutrient.

    Influences of the Organic Bacterial Manure on the Development of Peanut Plants and Its Nut Yield · 2001

    Opposite direction

144 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.